Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Palatial Baghdad Embassy diverts cash from diplomatic efforts worldwide

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 12:57 AM
Original message
Palatial Baghdad Embassy diverts cash from diplomatic efforts worldwide
THE BAGHDAD DRAIN
How Much Embassy Is Too Much?
By Elizabeth Williamson
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, March 2, 2007; Page A11


Some say the U.S. Embassy in Iraq is so complex and expensive that it diverts cash from diplomatic efforts worldwide. (By John Moore -- Getty Images)

....The nerve center of Iraq reconstruction efforts, housed in an ornate former Saddam Hussein palace with soaring ceilings and its own espresso bar, the embassy in Baghdad is one of the largest foreign missions ever operated by the State Department. Its complexity and expense, some say, hampers reconstruction efforts and drains cash from diplomatic efforts worldwide.

According to a State Department count, about 1,000 federal employees report to the U.S. Embassy in Iraq, not including hundreds of private contractors. State Department personnel are assigned to roughly half the slots in Baghdad, and the rest are reserved for an array of agencies, including about 90 from the Justice Department, 20 from the Department of Homeland Security, and four each from the Commerce Department and the Transportation Department. They are needed, officials say, to rebuild transit and mail services, to assist small businesses, to advise politicians and peasants.

The mission's closely guarded budget is a source of controversy at State, and across the federal government. At $923 million for the 2006 fiscal year, the budget was 20 times that of the Beijing embassy's that year, according to the State Department. More than two-thirds of the money pays for security. Salaries for about 600 staff from other federal agencies are not included in that figure, nor are some expenses.

"Maintaining an oversized mega-embassy in Baghdad is draining personnel and resources away from every other U.S. embassy around the world, and all for what?" said a senior State Department official, who spoke anonymously because of the sensitivity of the issue.

Travel outside the Green Zone requires a security entourage and involves weeks of organization. The embassy is seen as a key target for violence, which, along with fear of reprisals, makes many Iraqis afraid to visit. Consequently, Americans who work there see relatively few of the people they are there to help....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/01/AR2007030101497.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. It also has its own generators ...
... is completely air-conditioned, and has its own water purification system.

Built right in the middle of a city where people have one to two hours of electricty a day, and have to search out clean drinking water - thanks to our 'efforts' on their behalf.

That's the way to win hearts and minds, neocon style.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindsay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. It doesn't really matter much while Bush is in office.
Their idea of diplomacy is "We tell you what to do and you do it."

Doesn't require a lot of staff for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. We should demand to know the purpose of this monstrosity
And why we claim it and support it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 05:08 AM
Response to Original message
4. There just seems to be something awfully inappropriate
Edited on Fri Mar-02-07 05:21 AM by aint_no_life_nowhere
about a country ousting another country's dictator, occupying them, controlling and structuring their government, and then moving in to one of that dictator's former palaces. I'm sure the nerve and sheer audacity of the Bush Administration weighs on the mind of every Iraqi who drives by that former palace. It just seems to be very insensitive to me; bad PR and undiplomatic. Are the British doing the same thing? It sends a message that the United States doesn't give a F*%# about what the Iraqi people think and they can do anything they want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenZoneLT Donating Member (805 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 06:00 AM
Response to Original message
5. Wait until they open the new embassy
You think the current one's big; the brand-new one they're building down the street is gi-fucking-gantic.

IIANM, a bunch of those State department slots are unfilled, because the only people who will come over here are old hacks who like combat zones, and kids. All the grownup Staties with lives and families refuse the posting.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 06:06 AM
Response to Original message
6. "to advise peasants."
Are they kidding when they flog this shit. How many peasants got advise at the US embassy yesterday.
At least they could be honest, the warden's palace is the prison control room and nothing more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC