Do new Ohio recount prosecutions indicate unraveling of 2004 election theft cover-up?

[Radio_Lady]

(If this has been discussed this morning, I apologize. Please direct me to the appropriate threads.)

From: http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_1661.shtml

By Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman
Online Journal Guest Writers


Jan 22, 2007, 00:21

Three criminal prosecutions in Ohio's biggest county have opened with strong indications that the cover-up of the theft of the 2004 presidential election is starting to unravel. Prosecutors say these cases involve "rigging" the recount in Cuyahoga County (Cleveland), where tens of thousands of votes were shifted from John Kerry to George W. Bush, or else never counted.

Meanwhile, corroborating evidence continues to surface throughout Ohio, illuminating the GOP's theft of the presidency.

According to the Associated Press (AP), County Prosecutor Kevin Baxter opened the Cuyahoga trial by charging that "the evidence will show that this recount was rigged, maybe not for political reasons, but rigged nonetheless." Baxter said the three election workers "did this so they could spend a day rather than weeks or months" on the recount.

MORE AT LINK ABOVE...

[Lerkfish]

1. the fact that it CAN be rigged means results CAN"T be trusted.

especially not when owners of the machine companies are high level republican donors.

[Igel]

2. Nope. n/t

[3121guitarist]

3. Well, I have just looked at all the Ohio papers

And I haven't seen a word about it.

[Radio_Lady]

4. DUer Orleans gave me a couple of other links in another thread:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=30401&mesg_id=30401

Verdict Is In: Two Ohio Workers Found Guilty Of Rigging Vote Recount In 2004

I'm going to follow those up. Thanks, Guitarist