Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Carter: Dem leaders should follow people

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 03:10 PM
Original message
Carter: Dem leaders should follow people
Carter: Dem leaders should follow people
Carter Says Superdelegates Should Follow the People but Not Be Bound to Do So
AP News - Apr 13, 2008 14:51 EST - http://www.rawstory.com/news/mochila/Carter_Dem_leaders_should_follow_pe_04132008.html


Former President Carter says Democratic superdelegates should follow the people and vote for the presidential candidate with the most delegates, but that they also should be free to vote the other way if they want.

Carter said in a taped interview broadcast Sunday that "it would be a very serious mistake" and "difficult to explain" if the superdelegates were to vote against the candidate with the most popular votes, the most delegates and the most states won..........

Asked whether he agreed that superdelegates should not overturn the will of the people, Carter said, "I basically agree with it."

"But I think that any superdelegate who wishes to deviate from that opinion should be perfectly free to do so," he said. He noted that Clinton won Massachusetts but that two of its top superdelegates — Sens. Edward M. Kennedy and John Kerry — have endorsed Obama.

...... Carter spoke on ABC's "This Week."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
frebrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R n/m
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamthebandfanman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. yeah, they should do whatever they want
but then they should be prepared for the consequences of not going with the person who won the popular vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Popular vote -- or most states won -- or most delegates
So, which is it?

Then whole idea of the super delegates is to step in when someone has won a lot of early delegates or states or popular votes, but then has shown that he or she doesn't really have the support he or she had early on.

If they just follow the "most popular vote" theory, then what's the point of having them.

There is a possibility that a candidate could grab a lot of popular votes early on, then reveal himself/herself as a closet Republican and unacceptable to a lot of people who voted early on, after they've had a chance to re-evaluate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC