Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Report Finds Mine Safety Agency ‘Negligent’ in Approving Crandall Canyon Plan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 10:32 AM
Original message
Report Finds Mine Safety Agency ‘Negligent’ in Approving Crandall Canyon Plan

http://blog.aflcio.org/2008/04/01/report-finds-mine-safety-agency-negligent-in-approving-crandall-canyon-plan/

by Mike Hall, Apr 1, 2008

The Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) was “negligent” when it approved a mining plan that most mine safety experts believe played a major role in the Crandall Canyon coal mine disaster that killed six miners last August, a new report from the U.S. Department of Labor’s Inspector General’s office finds. Three rescue workers were killed several days later attempting to reach the workers.


The report does not pinpoint a cause for the deadly collapse but does charge MSHA with failure to “do everything appropriate” to protect the miners. MSHA approved the plan that called for “retreat mining,” where pillars of coal left in previously mined areas to support the mine roof are pulled down, allowing the roof to collapse and the recovery of more coal. According to the report:

MSHA’s actions and inactions, taken as a whole, lead us to conclude that lacked care and attention in fulfilling its responsibilities to protect miners….MSHA could not show how it analyzed roof control plans, the criteria it measured the plans against, the rationale for approving the plans, that the plans were properly implemented or that the plans continued to protect miners over time. These deficiencies evidence the agency’s serious and systemic lack of diligence in protecting miners, and we do not believe it is misleading to use the term “negligent.”

Following the Aug. 6 collapse, Robert Murray, CEO of Murray Energy Corp., which owned the mine, denied retreat mining was being used in the area where the six—whose bodies remain entombed in the now shut mine—were killed.


The report also raised concerns that company officials may have pressured MSHA to approve the plan. In a memo to MSHA two days before the safety agency approved a retreat mining plan, a Murray company official wrote:

I have a fire under my ass to get this approved. I need your help.

Mine Workers (UMWA) President Cecil Roberts says the report confirms what the union has alleged for years—that the relationship between mine owners and MSHA is too cozy.

FULL story at link.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hmm and which Bush crony former lobbyist runs the "mine safety" division?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Richard Stickler

http://blog.aflcio.org/2008/02/08/bush-wage-and-hour-no... /

DeCamp never won Senate confirmation for the Wage and Hour post, so in August 2006, President Bush circumvented the Senate and used a recess appointment to put him in the job. It’s the same tactic he’s used for other controversial nominees, including Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) chief Richard Stickler.

Then W cut the mine safety budget for this year!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. How Republicans can even be viable in WV is beyond me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC