Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Proposed West Virginia bill would require "Fetus Registry"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 06:41 PM
Original message
Proposed West Virginia bill would require "Fetus Registry"
http://www.journal-news.net/page/content.detail/id/503967.html?nav=5006

MARTINSBURG — Thirty-five years after the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark Roe v. Wade decision, abortion continues to be high on some legislative agendas.

This year, 61 bills were introduced in the state Legislature attempting to change existing abortion laws. Delegates Craig Blair, R-Berkeley, and John Overington, R-Berkeley; and Sen. Clark Barnes, R-Randolph, were among those to introduce the measures.

<snipping>

The measure, which was forwarded to the Committee on Health and Human Resources, aims to create an “aborted fetus registry.” The bill would require a “fetal death certificate,” and mandate that information about the fetus’ gestational age, the type of abortion performed and the age and county of residence of the woman receiving the abortion, be recorded. Any possible birth defects would also have to be noted, as would the “method of disposal of the remains,” the bill states.

<snipping>

Margaret Chapman, executive director of West Virginia Free said such data is already collected and retained by state agencies.

Chapman’s Charleston-based organization is a nonprofit agency that focuses on increasing women’s access to reproductive health care, birth control and sexual education. She believes that measures such as HB 2149 would further limit access in a state that has only two functioning abortion clinics and one of the lowest rates of abortions in the nation....

MORE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Clearly these Senators are in the pockets of Pottern Barn and Crate & Barrel. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sicksicksick_N_tired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
41. I propose an "ejaculation" registry!!! It's a minimum 50-yr-felony for failure to report!!!!
All a woman has to do is go to a community clinic to collect and date the sample.

I guarantee,...all this "pro-fetus" stuff would take a dramatic turn,...guaran-fucking-tee!!}(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lligrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Downright Scary nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ew. Just when you think you've seen it all. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. how about a jerking off registry, thats half a snow flake baby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Every sperm is sacred
Can't let them go to waste, now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. and i'm sure the (R) legislators that introduced this honk off regularly.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Probably because no woman would screw them
Hence their desire to control women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. no doubt. This kind of shit makes my blood boil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. Complete with samples
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. Damn control freaks
:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Yes, and it's crap like this...
... that reminds me I want a President who will, unequivocally and publicly, state that they will do everything within their power to protect a woman's right to choose. And that means no more Alitos on the SC as well.

These are the types of issues that should be raised in the ongoing debates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. What!?
Are you trying to say this isn't about saving the precious little babies?!!!! This is about controlling women?!!! No.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
10. Time to re-read "The Handmaid's Tale" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. That book gave me nightmares.
I read it two years ago, too, so I can just imagine the night terrors I would get if I re-read it now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
12. They haven't thought this through.
If a woman spontaneously aborts (miscarries) at home, how is she supposed to get the paperwork filled out? It wouldn't be hard to interpret that law as applying to miscarriages. Yeah, that's fair to a woman grieving that she lost her baby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. And many people abort (miscarry) without knowing
Therefore, I think it would be best if the all the women just go ahead and send in their used sanitary supplies. The legislature can determine if an abortion has occurred and notify the woman to fill out the paperwork. :evilgrin:

This fucktardery must end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #21
29. That's where I come down on this
Put these three jerkwads in charge of microscopic examination of every used sanitary product in the state. That should keep them busy enough to quit introducing stupid-ass legislation like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Mollusk Donating Member (172 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
15. Why do middle aged Christian men feel they must control women?
Edited on Sat Feb-23-08 07:32 PM by Angry Mollusk
Once again, radical Christian men are trying to control women-The idea of a woman having the right to decide whjat happens to her own body offends these christofacists to no end. If they could keep women chained at home, they would do that as well....

It's only a matter of time before they try and ban birth control, arguing that the sperm and egg are also lifeforms that need protection..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. Because they are terrified of us
We hold the power of life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
16. I often ask prolife women when they insist that the cells are human life.
Do you try to obtain a death certificate for every blob you find on a tampon? I find that to be an equally rediculous notion. Apparently not in West Virginia. I mean dayum!

Btw, I'm prochoice and I choose life. But being a man. What I think doesn't legally count for anything. My only legal choice is to pay or go to jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #16
42. Your only choice is to pay or go to jail? There is another option...
Talk to your gym teacher. Maybe he can recommend a book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
17. Great.
Just fucking great. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
18. Time to start sending them used pads and tampons
You never know if a miscarriage might have happened. Don't want to miss any of those aborted feti.

Jackasses, every one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TalkingDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #18
30. Ah, yes. Reviving an oldie goldie.
I remember in the 90's when this was proposed for a similar bill in.....(? brain fart)

That bill went down in flames. This one probably will too.

But if not, envelopes at the ready.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 03:21 AM
Response to Reply #30
33. This bill isn't going anywhere.
Legislators said they recognize that the initiatives are not likely to make much progress this year.

“That hasn’t been taken up, and the committee chairman isn’t going to have that on the agenda,” Overington said of House Bill 2149, for which he was the lead sponsor.


There are 23 Democrats and 11 Republicans in the WV Senate. In the House of Delegates, Democrats have a 72 to 28 majority. And this fall I think this will get even better.

Like somebody said upthread, these Republicans are just pandering to the fundies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MountainLaurel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #18
36. Here are the addresses of the three mentioned
Craig P. Blair
(R - Berkeley)
Room 150R, Building 1
State Capitol Complex
Charleston, WV 25305

John Overington
(R - Berkeley)
Room 258M, Building 1
State Capitol Complex
Charleston, WV 25305

Clark S. Barnes (R - Randolph)
Minority Whip
Room 203W, Building 1
State Capitol Complex
Charleston, WV 25305
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sutz12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
23. Where do I go to register my sperm? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
24. Hasn't Kansas tried something like this, too?
Jerks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MountainLaurel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #24
31. Virginia n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #24
40. It's probably something written by an anti-abortion group. These bills seem to make the rounds
in a lot of fundy states. We've had it presented in GA and they just tabled a fetal rights bill last week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smokey nj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
25. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
26. Well, damn. You mean we can't register the fetus at Bob's Bait and Tackle??
Maybe even a Fetus-land General!!! Call'em the real cabbage patch dolls ...and adopt the blobs and squishy masses out, complete with certificate of death and adoption. They could have cool names like Suctioned Sally and Shredded Pete.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
27. "61 bills were introduced in the state Legislature attempting to change existing abortion laws"
what an utter waste of time, grandstanding for the fundies. disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. Yeah, it's not like we have any real problems here in WV
Like poverty, hunger, homelessness, unemployment and lack of quality education.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
28. YET ANOTHER reason to leave WV. No wonder WV has ...
the oldest population of any US state: http://www.wvdhhr.org/bph/oehp/hsc/briefs/ten/default.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MountainLaurel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #28
35. I have to admit
It's shit like this why I'll never move back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
34. This is West Virginia, Republican sponsored bills do not pass in this state
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
37. New elected officials? The Menstruation Magistrates?
Edited on Sun Feb-24-08 01:42 PM by SoCalDem
They show up monthly at each home with a fertile female, and perform a monthly blood test?

or maybe they could take a page from the old "Show Us your Larks" cigarette commercials?? (Ladies, show us your..er...um...you know..)

or have the grocery stores track "ladies stuff", and report to the MMs if purchases drop "suddenly" in a household..?

Recalcitrant females may have to be taken into "protective custody", until the young'un is born..and then the Mom & child would be released back into the "wild", with no additional contact or support?

or maybe if the baby is particularly cute & white, it could always be "sold" to a deserving wealthy, but childless couple who are god-fearing Christians? (God wants them to have a child, so he made sure they had enought money to buy a cute one)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Firespirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
38. One of my sisters began as a triplet
The other two failed to develop and were absorbed by the surviving fetus.

Wouldn't that have to be reported? Not just ONE aborted fetus, but TWO, and they were cannibalized by a female, to boot! Clearly, this is the business of the State.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
39. After Bush, what state has excess resources to use for something like this?
Wouldn't they be better of spending the money on prenatal care for poor women and funding DFACS or some other social services that could actually help a living child?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC