Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I take it that * would have no problem with US states declaring independence

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 09:01 AM
Original message
I take it that * would have no problem with US states declaring independence
Edited on Tue Feb-19-08 09:10 AM by Paint It Black
Let's say that a state like Hawaii, Texas, or any other state (or group of states) decide that they want to declare themselves independent. Doesn't *'s decision to recognize the breakaway Kosovo province set a precedent? How can we demand that other countries allow their provinces the right to secede, but not allow our own states or areas to do so?

on edit: changed from "dangerous precedent" to just "precedent".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why are you against Kosovo becoming independent?
Just curious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I'm not per se - but would you have a problem if a US state wanted to secede?
If so, please explain why it's okay for non-US regions to declare independence, but it's not okay for US states or regions to do so?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Why not, it will probably happen if CONS take the White House
for another 4-8 years. I never said it wasn't okay for US states to secede. I just wonder why everyone is so huffy about Kosovo? The comments I have seen on other threads are appalling coming from "DEMOCRATIC" Underground. They read like FreeperVille.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qazplm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. well you know
it isnt as if only the US is supporting this, so is a good chunk of the rest of the world.

You know everything we support, or Bush supports for that matter, is automatically on its face evil or hypocritical.

IF we were oppressing a state, then you might have a point, but since currently all 50 are neither being suppressed nor held in against their will, then you dont.

I guess since we'd fight secession in our own land therefore we must never support secession in other lands?

That's pretty much 8 year old thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yugoslavia was a patchwork enforcement remnant of post-WWI brokering
It forced several distinct ethnicities and cultures to live under the Serbs for decades upon decades of misery. Since it never should have been in the first place, it is only right to see it broken up now. Much like the artificialness of the USSR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. the same WW1 dividing up caused the problems with the Curds, and Iraq, which was 3 tribal groups
forced together and divided..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kedrys Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
7. The Texas state constitution already provides for secession
and breakup into 4 distinct states, IIRC. Not that it would if Boots McCain is elected, but if he loses...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
8. it's amusing to watch the citizens of a country created by being a 'breakaway province'
object to citizens of another country doing the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlertLurker Donating Member (877 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
9. This is the first salvo in the war for the Caucasus.
Russia is threatening to recognize South Ossetia and Abkhazia (semi-autonomous provinces in Georgia), and who knows which is next? Obviously both the USA and Russia want to control the oil and natural gas rich lands bridging the Black Sea and Caspian. Somebody's nose will get bloodied, for certain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
10. I think it's inevitable that the US will fragment. Different states have little common interest.
We have seen that it is perfectly possible for people in California or New York, say, to be perfectly content while people suffer in places like Ohio and Michigan.

IMO, we are currently a country in name only; there is no purpose of country which does not care for one another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. You might be surprised, secessionist movements are already working
http://www.secessionist.us/

http://www.secessionist.us/second_secession_convention.htm

http://www.goodmagazine.com/section/Features/most_likely_to_secede

Do I ever think we'll see a independent Vermont? Probably not, but there are people out there who are working on making a fragmented US a reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. The US won't fragment with a bang; it will be whimper
We've already seen that the US government is incapable of governing and controlling large swaths of US territory; Katrina demonstrated the impotence of the US government to render assistance in a major disaster.

So I don't think the US will fragment due to secessionist movements, but rather from the federal government's inability to either control or provide assistance to large portions of the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC