Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cost to shoot down spy satellite: $60 million

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
TAWS Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 10:48 PM
Original message
Cost to shoot down spy satellite: $60 million
http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/02/15/spy.satellite/index.html

Anyone hear about the cost of the attempt to shoot down the falling spy satellite? Imagine what we could have done with the money instead...

"The Missile Defense Agency estimated the cost of a sea-based attempted intercept at $40 million to $60 million."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Cost to shoot down a Russian spy satellite: WW III, IV and V
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PearliePoo2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. what the hell?
what could possibly cost this much?
The boats are there, the misslies are on-board, the navi systems are there. Radar is ready.
What the fuck....no way!
Admit, I have yet to click on the link for additional info.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Missiles are $10 mil a pop. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. You really need to read the link. The missiles are $10 million each,
and they modified 3 of them for this particular task. The article speaks to 200+ scientists and engineers who have been working on this since January, and those folks don't come cheap!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hey, remember the days that people would be trying to figure out how to return the satellite to
Earth?

ESPECIALLY, because it contains hazardous materials...why are we shooting down the "potentially dangerous" satellite, again? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Because THIS ONE malfunctioned shortly after it was launched,
and it still contains almost a full payload of fuel.

(snip from article)
Because the super-secret spy satellite malfunctioned immediately after launch in December 2006, its fuel tank is full, and it would probably survive re-entry and disperse harmful, even potentially deadly fumes over an area the size of two football fields.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Are there no contigency plans in our government? Ever?
I need to go watch "Apollo Thirteen" again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. The hazardous materials excuse is nonsense
They don't want the spy part of the satellite (or any piece of it) in foreign hands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. I get a bad feeling that this will end up costing a whole lot more maybe....
x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack_DeLeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 02:48 AM
Response to Original message
10. Money well spent...
Get get three things out of it.

1. Test out our anti-missile/satellite system

2. Prevent foreign nations from potentially recovering some of our technology

3. Reduce the risk of someone getting injured ont he ground from this thing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. And, it will go off without a hitch, just like everything else the Bush government does, I'm sure.
I can't shake the feeling that he's been watching space movies, and is fantasizing about Bruce Willis and Ben Affleck "shooting up" the satellite.

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. I don't have a "good feeling" about this either.
Russia and China don't either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC