Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Happy Presidents Day

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
davidswanson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 11:11 AM
Original message
Happy Presidents Day
Today we celebrate Washington, Lincoln, and all our presidents, dead, living, and among the living dead.

We honor Washington who chose to step down after two terms and remarked on the occassion, long before President Eisenhower, that our nation must:

"avoid the necessity of those overgrown military establishments, which, under any form of government, are inauspicious to liberty, and which are to be regarded as particularly hostile to Republican Liberty."

Washington went on, in the same address, to warn of the danger of placing loyalties in political parties:

"All obstructions to the execution of the Laws, all combinations and associations, under whatever plausible character, with the real design to direct, control, counteract, or awe the regular deliberation and action of the constituted authorities, are destructive of this fundamental principle, and of fatal tendency. They serve to organize faction, to give it an artificial and extraordinary force; to put, in the place of the delegated will of the nation, the will of a party, often a small but artful and enterprising minority of the community; and, according to the alternate triumphs of different parties, to make the public administration the mirror of the ill-concerted and incongruous projects of faction, rather than the organ of consistent and wholesome plans digested by common counsels, and modified by mutual interests....

"I have already intimated to you the danger of parties in the state, with particular reference to the founding of them on geographical discriminations. Let me now take a more comprehensive view, and warn you in the most solemn manner against the baneful effects of the spirit of party, generally. This spirit, unfortunately, is inseparable from our nature, having its root in the strongest passions of the human mind. It exists under different shapes in all governments, more or less stifled, controlled, or repressed; but, in those of the popular form, it is seen in its greatest rankness, and is truly their worst enemy. The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge, natural to party dissension, which in different ages and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism. But this leads at length to a more formal and permanent despotism. The disorders and miseries, which result, gradually incline the minds of men to seek security and repose in the absolute power of an individual; and sooner or later the chief of some prevailing faction, more able or more fortunate than his competitors, turns this disposition to the purposes of his own elevation, on the ruins of Public Liberty."

Washington worried, of course, about a future president leading our nation into a war, and warned that:

"nothing is more essential, than that permanent, inveterate antipathies against particular Nations, and passionate attachments for others, should be excluded; and that, in place of them, just and amicable feelings towards all should be cultivated. The Nation, which indulges towards another an habitual hatred, or an habitual fondness, is in some degree a slave."

We also look back today at the president who was compelled by the American people to announce the liberation of American slaves. And we should recall the stand he took when still in Congress against a dishonest war of aggression against Mexico. Abraham Lincoln wrote to his law partner at the time, at the time that Lincoln was pushing toward a possible impeachment of President Polk for taking the nation to war on the basis of lies:

"Allow the President to invade a neighboring nation whenever he shall deem it necessary to repel an invasion, and you allow him to do so whenever he may choose to say he deems it necessary for such purpose - - and you allow him to make war at pleasure... The provision of the Constitution giving the war-making power to Congress, was dictated, as I understand it, by the following reasons: Kings had always been involving and impoverishing their people in wars, pretending generally, if not always, that the good of the people was the object. This, our Convention understood to be the most oppressive of all Kingly oppressions; and they resolved to so frame the Constitution that no one man should hold the power of bringing this oppression upon us."

And we should recall that the framers of our nation quite carefully placed presidential responsibility in the hands of one person, not two. The governance of a Cheney-Bush partnership, assisted by a cabal of advisors whose advice and corrupt deals are kept secret from the public is as far from the visions our past leaders had for us as is our current empire abroad.

And we should recall our less stellar but generally law abiding past presidents as well. After the people's representatives took back the presidency from the abuses of Richard Nixon, the Congress passed something called the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, and President Jimmy Carter added to it something called a "signing statement" which read as follows:

"I am pleased to sign into law today the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978. . . . The bill requires, for the first time, a prior judicial warrant for all electronic surveillance for foreign intelligence or counterintelligence purposes in the United States in which communications of U.S. persons might be intercepted. It clarifies the Executive's authority to gather foreign intelligence by electronic surveillance in the United States. It will remove any doubt about the legality of those surveillances which are conducted to protect our country against espionage and international terrorism."

Remember, it is the existence of past signing statements like this one, which took for granted the president's responsibility to obey laws, that serves as Bush and Cheney's primary defense for their use of signing statements to claim the right to violate laws.

This Presidents' Day, think about what it means to hear an unelected president say

"If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator."

and to watch him behave accordingly, and to not do anything to restore our republic.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
trusty elf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. George W vs George W
sigh

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. Happy Presidents Day
to everyone except *.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geardaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I would add
41 to that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madamesilverspurs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. Thanks for reminding us
that we have had presidents capabable of profound thought. Their legacies stand in stark counterpoint to the blithering embarrassment that presently stains the office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loser_user Donating Member (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. Most underrated president of all time:
Chester A. Arthur!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. I notice that the WPE decided to fly out of
the country rather than hear that he is the Worst President Ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC