Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Verizon Business Pulls Down American Flag of War Veteran

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 08:07 PM
Original message
Verizon Business Pulls Down American Flag of War Veteran

http://blog.aflcio.org/2008/02/15/verizon-business-pulls-down-american-flag-of-war-veteran/

Kevin Byrne, Voice@Work field mobilization/communications specialist, describes a move by Verizon Business that most of us would call un-American.

When a majority of Verizon Business technicians throughout New England and New York formed unions with the Electrical Workers (IBEW) and Communications Workers of America (CWA), the company refused to recognize their union. Instead, management began a fierce anti-union campaign. But the animosity of Verizon Business moved to the absurd after the company removed an American flag from the cubicle of Terry Skiest, who recently returned from his third tour of duty in Afghanistan.

Skiest, a member of the Massachusetts Air National Guard, recently returned from his third tour of duty in the Middle East and has proudly flown his unit’s American flag over the sands of Iraq and the mountains of Afghanistan. (See a video of Skiest here, and then tell Verizon Business to put the flag back up on Skiest’s wall.)

When he’s not defending our country overseas, Skiest works as a technician for Verizon Business in Acton, Mass. Skiest is part of a group of technicians at Verizon Business who signed authorization cards and had their majority verified by Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) and four U.S. representatives last year. But when Skiest left his American flag hanging outside his cubicle during his last tour in Afghanistan, Verizon Business removed it.




Verizon Business recently implemented a strict policy against displaying “personal items” in public areas to prevent the posting of pro-union fliers, union organizers contend. The policy was put in place after the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) cited the company for “interfering with, restraining and coercing employees in the exercise of their rights” to form a union by prohibiting distribution of union materials while permitting anti-union solicitations.

Maybe Verizon should take a look at the NLRB’s own policy. Just this week, the NLRB announced that an American flag will be displayed at every union representation election, stating:

The display of an American flag will impress upon all the participants to elections—employers, unions, and most importantly voters—the solemnity and importance of the Agency’s representation elections.

FULL story at link.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm having a hard time getting past this phrase:
"defending our country overseas ..."

it's sort of killing the rest of it for me, I wish they had phrased it in terms of rights to display personal items in general instead of this patriotic-schlock appeal to nationalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DavidDvorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yep. My reaction exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. yeah, there hasn't really been any 'defending' going on... more like slaughtering
and illegally invading and occupying and war criming going on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think a citizen should be allowed to display the national colors.
In a work environment when pictures of family, etc. are permitted.

Why would that bother anybody?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC