Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Charles Swift: Use Of Waterboarding Evidence In Court Unheard Of Since 'Spanish Inquisition'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:55 AM
Original message
Charles Swift: Use Of Waterboarding Evidence In Court Unheard Of Since 'Spanish Inquisition'
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/02/12/swift-911

Charles Swift: Use Of Waterboarding Evidence In Court Unheard Of Since ‘Spanish Inquisition’

Military prosecutors announced yesterday that they have filed death penalty charges “against a former senior leader of Al Qaeda and five other Guantánamo detainees on Monday for their roles” in the 9/11 attacks.

One of these detainees, Khalid Sheikh Mohammad, the so-called 9/11 “mastermind,” has been confirmed to have been waterboarded. Yesterday evening, Attorney General Mike Mukasey refused to rule out using this evidence in court, saying, “What evidence gets presented at this trial is up to the prosecutors.”

On CNN last night, Charles Swift, the “hero of Guantanamo” who represented Salim Hamdan in the case Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, slammed the government’s refusal to rule out waterboarding-based evidence in the military commission:

SWIFT: And if we use — we move beyond the torture discussion to the question of using this in a trial where life and death is at stake. If we use waterboarded testimony in that trial, to my knowledge…the last precedent for using that kind of testimony was the Spanish Inquisition.

VIDEO AT LINK

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. USA ~ USA ~ USA ~ USA
:shrug: Does anyone believe the American people really give a shit if we torture people or not? It just makes it that much more entertaining for them...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nightrider767 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Sad But True...
Seems to be a good point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDJane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. I can't tell you how I feel about this.
It is, in my view, a complete abrogation of civilized behaviour and the rule of law.

There is absolutely no excuse for this behaviour, and there should be a war crimes tribunal for the entire admninistration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. Email I got from Think Progress
Thanks Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff ########XX##XXXXXXXXXX
Sent: February 12, 2008 9:50 AM
To: Thinkprogress
Subject: A message from the ThinkProgress.org website


You may want to look around for a video of Charles Swift LIVE on CNN
yesterday afternoon.

Links to the transcript

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&fo
rum=389&topic_id=2851117&mesg_id=2851117

He was on during the 1PM hour
http://www6.lexisnexis.com/publisher/EndUser?Action=UserDisplayCiteList&
orgId=574&topicId=100007219

Prosecutors Seek Death Penalty for 9/11 Suspects; Student Shot in
Memphis High School; Candidates Campaign Before Potomac Primaries CNN,
SHOW: CNN NEWSROOM 1:00 PM EST DON LEMON, CNN ANCHOR: Sparked by the
worst terrorist attack on American soil and years in the making, the
government\'s 9/11 case moves forward. BRIANNA KEILAR, CNN ANCHOR: We
start with breaking news...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. Any judge who allows the use of such testimony
needs to be removed. It's completely against our entire body of law to use evidence obtained under extreme duress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well, no one could have anticipated the Spanish Inquisition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. Our Shame will live down through the ages for this.. . . .n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. I cannot even believe anyone puts up with this. What have we become? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 02:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC