Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

***** FISA on the Senate Floor ***** LIVE Feinstein speaking

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 03:10 PM
Original message
***** FISA on the Senate Floor ***** LIVE Feinstein speaking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R - Thanks! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. Dodd up
thanking Feingold for his leadership against bulk collection of electronic communication. Reminding the Senate they took an oath to uphold the constitution. Looks like another fiery well reasoned speech against immunity!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #20
139. FULL TEXT: Senator Dodd's 2.5 hour speech = 008.02.11 = LINK to DU thread
Senator Chris Dodd's complete 2 1/2 hour speech from last night
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x2854637
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. I hope it doesn't turn out badly, as
I cannot take one more fucking thing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. She (Feinstein) is still whining
Edited on Mon Feb-11-08 03:15 PM by vpilot
for telecoms immunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I've given up of Feinstein
She might as well reregister as a liberal Republican as often as she bows down to Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ORDagnabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. why would you give up on somebody with a (D) behind their name?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Thanks n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. WTF is Hatch reading here?
Sheriffs demanding immunity for telephone companies? This is madness.

Shut your hatch Orrin - Bush violated the law and so did the telecom companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Sure, a lot of
Edited on Mon Feb-11-08 03:35 PM by vpilot
Sheriffs want immunity for telecoms, there are probably lots of thing they would like to do without being burdened with a constitution. He also had a chart listing the AG'S from a number of states that want immunity, any bets on how many are RePukes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. All n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
canadianbeaver Donating Member (929 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
9. Feed the rats please......k&r...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. debating amendments now, Orin Hatch supports "bi-partisan immunity provision"
What a crock! "bi-partisan immunity provision"

now on bulk collections
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
canadianbeaver Donating Member (929 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Thanks so much......you really do rock!!
appreciated!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
10. kicking this and wish I was kicking something else
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. Feingold is on fire n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
13. "some believe"
As Hatch speaks, I get the feeling that we are hearing the minutae of rationalizations that goes into crafting a fascist state within the confines of a legislative democracy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Whitehouse up now
Fugg Hatch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. I love Whitehouse
Batten down that hatch Sheldon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
18. Yep Feingold
telling it like it is, "Give them a get out of jail card for ignoring the law in the past", well said Russ!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. He was great
Dodd up now.

There's a thread with a link stating that Leahy will support Dodd's filibuster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Kick
Dodd is delivering a great speech
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Dodd really
does a great job, I hope he gets the support he deserves on this. Leahy joining him will really help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. right on Russ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
24. Voting now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
25. Emptywheel - » FISA Debate Liveblog
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
26. firedoglake - Firedoglake weblog » FISA Debate In Senate, Part VII
firedoglake - Firedoglake weblog » FISA Debate In Senate
http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/24/fisa-debate-in-senate-part-vii/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
27. Crooks and Liars » FISA Debate Open Thread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
28. VIDEO: FISA debate Jackson Lee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
29. VIDEO: Senator Dodd quotes Glenn Greenwald on FISA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #29
32. VIDEO: Mukasey: No, I Will Not Investigate BUSH Illegal Warrantless Wiretapping
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #32
34. VIDEO: Olbermann Tears Bush Another New One, This Time On FISA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #34
54. VIDEO: Keith Olbermann Countdown Comment: On FISA, Telecom Immunity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
30. Just joined
How is the vote going?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
31. Is this the Judiciary version of the bill they are voting on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #31
59. VIDEO: 2008.01.31 - Senator Harry Reid on the FISA Debate - Amendments to be Debated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
33. The Maine girls votes Aye with the dems
Will wonders never cease. Hagel votes Aye also
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
35. VIDEO: 2008.02.06 Senator Sheldon Whitehouse FISA Debate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #35
37. 2008.02.06 Senator Specter FISA Debate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #35
38. thanks I am curious what my senator said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
36. they are voting on the Feingold-Webb Amendment and you
can hear those stupid repigs saying NO, Congress needs a cleaning out!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #36
39. Eight amendments subject to up or down, simple majority votes.
Edited on Tue Feb-12-08 10:51 AM by L. Coyote
"A Feingold-Webb amendment that prohibits the use of illegally obtained information. Bulk collection (Feingold): Requires the government to certify to the FISA Court that it is collecting communications of targets for whom there is a foreign intelligence interest."

FISA Fight: How's it playing in Kansas?
by mcjoan - http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/2/4/125512/9429/979/449546
Mon Feb 04, 2008

Judging by this letter to the editor in the Topeka Capital-Journal, the FISA fight has reached the red states.

..........

debate on the FISA overhaul. So far the schedule of votes hasn't been determined, but the telco amnesty
provisions will probably come tomorrow. As a reminder, here's what's coming in terms of amendments:

* Four non-controversial amendments will pass on unanimous consent--they won't require a vote. These
include Feingold's amendment requiring Congress see FISC rulings for the past five years, Whitehouse and
Kennedy amendments allowing for acquisition to continue during government appeal and emphasizing prohibitions
on domestic targeting, and a Bond amendment that eliminates a 7-day deadline for the FISC.
* Eight amendments subject to up or down, simple majority votes.
o Two from Bond, the most important one which does loosen current restrictions would allow
surveillance without a warrant in cases that involve the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.
o The critical telco amnesty amendment by Feingold/Dodd which strips the provision providing
for telco amnesty from the current bill--this is going to get two hours of debate.
o Whitehouse-Specter is the follow-up if Feingold-Dodd doesn't pass. It will also get two hours.
It substitutes the government for telcos being sued for their participation in the warrantless
wiretapping program, but only if the company is first determined by the FISA Court to have
cooperated with the Bush Administration reasonably and in good faith.
o Three Feingold amendments that raise the bar for the government to prove that they are after
foreign intelligence and one that gives the FISC power to order surveillance stopped if the
government's application is deficient.
o A Feingold-Webb amendment that prohibits the use of illegally obtained information. Bulk
collection (Feingold): Requires the government to certify to the FISA Court that it is
collecting communications of targets for whom there is a foreign intelligence interest.
* Four amendments that require a 60 vote margin. These are Whitehouse's amendment on minimization,
the process of weeding out data obtained about U.S. persons and destroying it. This amendment would grant
the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court the discretionary authority to not only approve minimization
rules but to review their implementation. Two from Feinstein that allow FISC to review the AG's declaration
that the telcos acted in good faith before they get their immunity and a second that makes FISA the exclusive
means of foreign surveillance. Finally, Cardin has an amendment to sunset the law in four years as opposed to six.

Since I wrote that a few days ago, the status of the Feinstein amendment on exclusivity (making the FISA court
the sole means of surveillance) has changed. This one could very likely get a simple majority of Senators, and
would also very likely be a poison pill, forcing a Bush veto.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
40. VIDEO: 2008.02.06 Senator Jay Rockefeller FISA Debate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
41. VIDEO: 2008.02.06 Senator Feingold FISA Debate I
Edited on Tue Feb-12-08 11:02 AM by L. Coyote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #41
44. VIDEO: 2008.02.06 Senator Feingold FISA Debate II
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #41
46. VIDEO: 2008.02.05 Senator Feingold FISA Debate I
Edited on Tue Feb-12-08 11:43 AM by L. Coyote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #41
47. VIDEO: 2008.02.05 Senator Feingold FISA Debate II
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #41
55. VIDEO: 2008.02.04 Senator Sheldon Whitehouse FISA Debate
Edited on Tue Feb-12-08 11:44 AM by L. Coyote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #41
58. VIDEO: 2008.02.04 Senator Harry Reid FISA Debate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #41
60. VIDEO: 2008.02.04 Senate FISA Debate I = Bond, Rockefeller, Feingold
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #41
61. VIDEO: 2008.02.04 Senate FISA Debate II = Bond, Rockefeller, Feingold
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #41
63. VIDEO: 2008.02.04 Senate FISA Debate III = Bond, Rockefeller, Feingold
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #63
65. Thank you so very much
for these videos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #63
66. You are welcome. The voting is slow, so I'm filling in the moments posting to Videos on DU
Edited on Tue Feb-12-08 12:11 PM by L. Coyote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
42. Amendment Failed. Coming to order again. Dodd up on next amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
43. Voting on amendment to remove telecom immunity? right??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ellipsis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #43
45. Yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #45
48. Confirmation appreciated. This one determines if Dodd will filibuster again!!
I'm rather certain. Any updates on that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sattahipdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
49. unchecked by its constitutional coequals.
JOHN DEAN

No presidency that I can find in history has adopted a policy of expanding
presidential powers merely for the sake of expanding presidential powers.
Presidents in the past who have expanded their powers have done so when
pursuing policy objectives. It has been the announced policy of the
Bush/Cheney presidency, however, from its outset, to expand presidential
power for its own sake, and it continually searched for avenues to do just
that, while constantly testing to see how far it can push the limits. I must add
that never before have I felt the slightest reason to fear our government.
Nor do I frighten easily. But I do fear the Bush/Cheney government (and
the precedents they are creating) because this administration is caught up in
the rectitude of its own self- righteousness, and for all practical purposes
this presidency has remained largely unchecked by its constitutional coequals.

http://rawstory.com/news/2006/Testimony_of_John_Dean_on_censure_0331.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #49
53. "to expand presidential power for its own sake" I doubt that. There is an agenda!
I believe the agenda is usually known as "overthrow" of democracy. These US persons specialized in that for decades in Latin America!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
50. Dodd Amendment failed. Immunity is still in the bill at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
51. Feingold Amendment up now. Bulk collection prohibition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #51
52. Thanks. I'm late to the thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
56. Bond Amendment on WMD proliferation detection provisions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #56
57. Passed on a voice vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
62. LIVE Feinstein speaking = on the amendment
"Important court have an opportunity court be able to review decisions"

Rs want this to be an Executive discretion, a take-over of Judicial powers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
64. Seems to be more than
a few Dem's voting with the RePukes.Disgusting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #64
67. what the heck is up with them worrying about the poor telecoms?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #67
70. IF thrown out of courts, it covers up BUSH's felonious, illegal, unconstitutional wiretapping
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #70
73. I really need to use the sarcasm notation
I meant it makes me sick...I believe it was Kit Bond that was talking about hurting profits. :mad:

The telecoms helped write the current laws. They should have been held responsible for their actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
68. VIDEO: Senator Chris Dodd Speaks Against Telecom Amnesty FISA Bill
Edited on Tue Feb-12-08 12:12 PM by L. Coyote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
69. VIDEO: Senator Chris Dodd Likens Telecoms/Bush Immunity to Nazi Nuremberg Defense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
71. Clerk reporting the amendment to bring cloture. "Will debate end?" motion.
yeas and nays mandatory, roll call vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #71
72. I think it will,
I heard several of the sellouts, Feinstein, Lincoln, etc voting yea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
74. Hooray for Senator Dodd. Church Committee How would they judge us?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buzzard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #74
75. Can this Bill be stopped in any way?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #75
77. YES, it will be one way or another. Filibuster will not allow immunity
and then when the NO IMMUNITY bill goes to Bush, he will veto it to protect himself instead of reforming FISA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
76. IF Retroactive immunity is granted, WILL YOU STILL RESPECT THE LAW?
I don't know why anyone should obey the laws of the United States wshen the powerful are immune to the rule of law!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
78. Maria Cantwell (D-WA) up now. Wants Immunity OUT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
79. "Sophisticated equipment monitors all communications in real time" Cantwell
Speaking of what whistleblower, Mark Klein, reported.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
80. Quorum call now. Cantwell was GRRRREEAT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
81. C-SPAN Featured Links = FISA Reauthorization
Edited on Tue Feb-12-08 03:29 PM by L. Coyote
http://www3.capwiz.com/c-span/issues/bills/?billnum=S.2248&congress=110&size=full

'An original bill to amend the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, to modernize and streamline the provisions of that Act, and for other purposes. '
Bill # S.2248


Status:
10/26/2007: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 453.
10/26/2007: Select Committee on Intelligence. Original measure reported to Senate by Senator Rockefeller. With written report No. 110-209. Additional and Minority views filed.
10/31/2007: Committee on the Judiciary. Hearings held.
11/01/2007: Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary pursuant to section 3(b) of S.Res. 400, 94th Congres, as amended by S.Res. 445, 108th Congress, for a period not to exceed 10 days of session.
11/08/2007: Committee on the Judiciary. Date of scheduled consideration. SD-226. 10:00 a.m.
11/15/2007: Committee on the Judiciary. Date of scheduled consideration. SD-226. 10:00 a.m.
11/16/2007: Committee on the Judiciary. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
11/16/2007: Committee on the Judiciary. Reported by Senator Leahy with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.
11/16/2007: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 512.
12/14/2007: Cloture motion on the motion to proceed to the measure presented in Senate.
12/14/2007: Motion to proceed to consideration of measure withdrawn in Senate.
12/14/2007: Motion to proceed to consideration of measure made in Senate.
12/17/2007: Cloture on the motion to proceed invoked in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 76 - 10. Record Vote Number: 435.
12/17/2007: Motion to proceed to measure considered in Senate.
12/17/2007: Measure laid before Senate by motion.
01/22/2008: By Senator Leahy from Committee on the Judiciary filed written report. Report No. 110-258. Additional and Minority views filed.
01/23/2008: Considered by Senate.
01/23/2008: The committee substitute was modified by Unanimous Consent.
01/24/2008: Considered by Senate.
01/24/2008: Motion to table the committee substitute, as modified, agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 60 - 36. Record Vote Number: 2.
01/24/2008: S.AMDT.3909 Amendment SA 3909 proposed by Senator Feingold to Amendment SA 3911. To require that certain records by submitted to Congress.
01/24/2008: S.AMDT.3911 Cloture motion on amendment SA 3911 presented in Senate.
01/24/2008: S.AMDT.3916 Amendment SA 3916 proposed by Senator Bond to Amendment SA 3909. Of a perfecting nature.
01/24/2008: S.AMDT.3918 Amendment SA 3918 proposed by Senator Reid to language proposed to be stricken by amendment no. 3911. Relative to the extension of the Protect America Act of 2007.
01/24/2008: S.AMDT.3918 Cloture motion on amendment SA 3918 presented in Senate.
01/24/2008: S.AMDT.3911 Amendment SA 3911 proposed by Senator Rockefeller. In the nature of a substitute.
01/25/2008: Considered by Senate.
01/25/2008: S.AMDT.3911 Considered by Senate.
01/25/2008: S.AMDT.3918 Considered by Senate.
01/25/2008: S.AMDT.3916 Considered by Senate.
01/25/2008: S.AMDT.3909 Considered by Senate.
01/28/2008: Considered by Senate.
01/28/2008: S.AMDT.3918 Considered by Senate.
01/28/2008: S.AMDT.3918 Cloture on amendment SA 3918 not invoked in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 48 - 45. Record Vote Number: 4.
01/28/2008: S.AMDT.3916 Considered by Senate.
01/28/2008: S.AMDT.3911 Considered by Senate.
01/28/2008: S.AMDT.3909 Considered by Senate.
01/28/2008: S.AMDT.3911 Cloture on amendment SA 3911 not invoked in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 48 - 45. Record Vote Number: 3.
01/31/2008: Considered by Senate.
01/31/2008: S.AMDT.3911 Considered by Senate.
01/31/2008: S.AMDT.3916 Considered by Senate.
01/31/2008: S.AMDT.3960 Amendment SA 3960 proposed by Senator Reid for Senator Kennedy to Amendment SA 3911. To clarify that the authority under title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 does not extend to purely domestic communications.
01/31/2008: S.AMDT.3960 Amendment SA 3960 as modified agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.
01/31/2008: S.AMDT.3945 Amendment SA 3945 proposed by Senator Reid for Senator Bond to Amendment SA 3911. To strike the time limitation for certain appeals.
01/31/2008: S.AMDT.3945 Amendment SA 3945 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.
01/31/2008: S.AMDT.3932 Amendment SA 3932 proposed by Senator Reid for Senator Whitehouse to Amendment SA 3911. To provide for implementation of an order pending appeal.
01/31/2008: S.AMDT.3932 Amendment SA 3932 as modified agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.
01/31/2008: S.AMDT.3918 Proposed amendment SA 3918 withdrawn in Senate.
01/31/2008: S.AMDT.3918 Considered by Senate.
01/31/2008: S.AMDT.3916 Proposed amendment SA 3916 withdrawn in Senate.
01/31/2008: S.AMDT.3909 Amendment SA 3909 as modified agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.
01/31/2008: S.AMDT.3909 Considered by Senate.
02/04/2008: Considered by Senate. (CR S564-575, S575-580)
02/04/2008: S.AMDT.3915 Amendment SA 3915 proposed by Senator Feingold to Amendment SA 3911. To place flexible limits on the use of information obtained using unlawful procedures.
02/04/2008: S.AMDT.3911 Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S564)
02/04/2008: S.AMDT.3979 Amendment SA 3979 proposed by Senator Feingold to Amendment SA 3911. (consideration: CR S568-574) To provide safeguards for communications involving persons inside the United States.
02/04/2008: S.AMDT.3930 Amendment SA 3930 proposed by Senator Cardin to Amendment SA 3911. (consideration: CR S574-575, S576-577; text: CR S574) To modify the sunset provision.
02/04/2008: S.AMDT.3920 Amendment SA 3920 proposed by Senator Whitehouse to Amendment SA 3911. (consideration: CR S564-568; text: CR S564) To provide procedures for compliance reviews.
02/05/2008: Considered by Senate.
02/05/2008: S.AMDT.3907 Amendment SA 3907 proposed by Senator Dodd to Amendment SA 3911. To strike the provisions providing immunity from civil liability to electronic communication service providers for certain assistance provided to the Government.
02/05/2008: S.AMDT.3979 Considered by Senate.
02/05/2008: S.AMDT.3941 Amendment SA 3941 proposed by Senator Bond to Amendment SA 3911. To expedite the review of challenges to directives under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978.
02/05/2008: S.AMDT.3938 Amendment SA 3938 proposed by Senator Bond to Amendment SA 3911. To include prohibitions on the international proliferation of weapons of mass destruction in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978.
02/05/2008: S.AMDT.3930 Considered by Senate.
02/05/2008: S.AMDT.3920 Considered by Senate.
02/05/2008: S.AMDT.3915 Considered by Senate.
02/05/2008: S.AMDT.3913 Amendment SA 3913 proposed by Senator Feingold to Amendment SA 3911. To prohibit reverse targeting and protect the rights of Americans who are communicating with people abroad.
02/05/2008: S.AMDT.3912 Amendment SA 3912 proposed by Senator Feingold to Amendment SA 3911. To modify the requirements for certifications made prior to the initiation of certain acquisitions.
02/05/2008: S.AMDT.3911 Considered by Senate.
02/06/2008: Considered by Senate.
02/06/2008: S.AMDT.3907 Considered by Senate.
02/06/2008: S.AMDT.3915 Considered by Senate.
02/06/2008: S.AMDT.3979 Considered by Senate.
02/06/2008: S.AMDT.3941 Considered by Senate.
02/06/2008: S.AMDT.3938 Considered by Senate.
02/06/2008: S.AMDT.3930 Proposed amendment SA 3930, pursuant to the order of January 31, 2008, having failed to achieve the required 60 votes in the affirmative, was withdrawn in Senate.
02/06/2008: S.AMDT.3930 Considered by Senate.
02/06/2008: S.AMDT.3930 Amendment SA 3930, pursuant to the order of January 31, 2008, having failed to achieve the required 60 votes in the affirmative, was not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 49 - 46. Record Vote Number: 7.
02/06/2008: S.AMDT.3927 Amendment SA 3927 proposed by Senator Specter to Amendment SA 3911. To provide for the substitution of the United States in certain civil actions.
02/06/2008: S.AMDT.3920 Considered by Senate.
02/06/2008: S.AMDT.3919 Amendment SA 3919 proposed by Senator Feinstein to Amendment SA 3911. To provide for the review of certifications by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.
02/06/2008: S.AMDT.3913 Considered by Senate.
02/06/2008: S.AMDT.3912 Considered by Senate.
02/06/2008: S.AMDT.3911 Considered by Senate.
02/06/2008: S.AMDT.3910 Amendment SA 3910 proposed by Senator Feinstein to Amendment SA 3911. To provide a statement of the exclusive means by which electronic surveillance and interception of certain communications may be conducted.
02/07/2008: Considered by Senate.
02/07/2008: S.AMDT.3907 Considered by Senate.
02/07/2008: S.AMDT.3910 Considered by Senate.
02/07/2008: S.AMDT.3979 Considered by Senate.
02/07/2008: S.AMDT.3941 Considered by Senate.
02/07/2008: S.AMDT.3941 Amendment SA 3941 as modified agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote.
02/07/2008: S.AMDT.3938 Considered by Senate.
02/07/2008: S.AMDT.3927 Considered by Senate.
02/07/2008: S.AMDT.3920 Considered by Senate.
02/07/2008: S.AMDT.3919 Considered by Senate.
02/07/2008: S.AMDT.3915 Considered by Senate.
02/07/2008: S.AMDT.3915 Amendment SA 3915 not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 40 - 56. Record Vote Number: 11.
02/07/2008: S.AMDT.3913 Considered by Senate.
02/07/2008: S.AMDT.3913 Amendment SA 3913 not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 38 - 57. Record Vote Number: 12.
02/07/2008: S.AMDT.3912 Considered by Senate.
02/07/2008: S.AMDT.3911 Considered by Senate.
02/08/2008: Cloture motion on the bill presented in Senate.
02/08/2008: Considered by Senate.
02/08/2008: S.AMDT.3907 Considered by Senate.
02/08/2008: S.AMDT.3911 Considered by Senate.
02/08/2008: S.AMDT.3979 Considered by Senate.
02/08/2008: S.AMDT.3938 Considered by Senate.
02/08/2008: S.AMDT.3927 Considered by Senate.
02/08/2008: S.AMDT.3920 Considered by Senate.
02/08/2008: S.AMDT.3919 Considered by Senate.
02/08/2008: S.AMDT.3912 Considered by Senate.
02/08/2008: S.AMDT.3910 Considered by Senate.
02/11/2008: Considered by Senate.
02/11/2008: S.AMDT.3938 Considered by Senate.
02/11/2008: S.AMDT.3979 Considered by Senate.
02/11/2008: S.AMDT.3927 Considered by Senate.
02/11/2008: S.AMDT.3920 Considered by Senate.
02/11/2008: S.AMDT.3919 Considered by Senate.
02/11/2008: S.AMDT.3907 Considered by Senate.
02/11/2008: S.AMDT.3912 Considered by Senate.
02/11/2008: S.AMDT.3911 Considered by Senate.
02/11/2008: S.AMDT.3910 Considered by Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #81
85. Another useful link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
82. Adding the Dodd link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #82
84. Thanks too many threads :) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
83. Thanks and kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
86. Comment at TPM: Dodd: It's up to The House = "single largest invasion of privacy in .. history ..."
Dodd: It's up to The House
By Paul Kiel - February 12, 2008, 2:54PM - http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/02/dodd_its_up_to_the_house.php

Speaking to a conference call of reporters this afternoon, Sen. Chris Dodd (D-CT) said that, reflecting on the string of defeats in the Senate today, he thought the House was the best hope for stripping retroactive immunity from the final surveillance bill.

"We've lost every single battle we had on this bill .... We're not getting anywhere at all" he said. "The question now is can the House do better." After the bill passes in the Senate, as is expected late today or tomorrow, the bill would head to a conference. There, conferees from both houses will try to hash out the significant differences between the House and Senate versions, the issue of retroactive immunity chief among them.

However, Dodd said, if the final bill emerging from that powwow does contain retroactive immunity, he said he'd "absolutely" filibuster that bill; he'd use "whatever vehicles we can" to stop it.

The Senate had "just sanctioned" the "single largest invasion of privacy in the history of the country," he said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #86
87. Meanwhile M$M is giving us non-stop coverage of
the horse race. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
88. HELP....There will NOT be a Conference Committee?????
I remembered reading this at the time, but confess that I do not know all the rules. Can anyone shed additional light on the procedure going forward? Maybe something has changed since this was written?


http://cboldt.blogspot.com/2008/02/fisa-and-economic-stimulus.html

Monday, February 04, 2008

"After passage, the contents of S.2248 are substituted for the House's bill, H.R.3773, the RESTORE Act, and the Senate bill will be sent to the House in the vehicle of H.R.3773. The Senate has formally signaled that it will not request a conference with the House, to resolve differences. At this point of the process on the FISA bill, a conference request is premature because the House has yet to weigh in on the Senate's proposed legislation. While the two bills are different, the formality of disagreement is presently absent. See Riddicks - Conferences and Conference Reports, in particular pp 467-8, which describe the interaction between both chambers.

Looking ahead, neither chamber has an obligation to agree to a request for a conference, even if the other chamber makes such a request. Further auguring against a conference committee ever coming into being, insistence on its amendment and requesting a conference is a debatable motion in the Senate. Being debatable invokes the possibility of delay due to objection to voting, cloture, etc.

On the possibility that my "there will be no conference" prediction is in error, one might review the details of precedence of motions relating to matters passing between the two chambers. This parliamentary procedure is described in Riddicks Rules: Amendments Between Houses.

While the debate on FISA is sure to generate some heat, I think the outcome is foregone. For purposes of this page, I'm thinking to insert vote results in the list above rather than create a running commentary. The substantive debate will be repetitive of points previously asserted."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #88
89. I believe this will go to Conference. Anyone? Then votes in both chambers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #89
92. Thanks for the reply and hope you are correct n/t
Edited on Tue Feb-12-08 04:10 PM by slipslidingaway
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
90. TPM coverage today is good. LINK
http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/

I'm checking out for a bit. If videos start appearing, do compile the links in this thread please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #90
91. Patrick Leahy speaking now n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #91
93. This is great
Alice in wonderland stuff!!! Go Pat Leahy!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trashcanistanista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
94. The vote was expected at 4:00pm
It's passed that now.Are they going to run out the clock before holiday recess without a vote or will this go on all evening? Anybody know. Leahy is very good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #94
98. I think I heard vote now at 5:30 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
95. Glen Greenwald & FDL petition to House members...
http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/02/12/amnesty_day/index.html

"...UPDATE II: FDL has a petition, jointly sponsored by me, directed at House members, demanding that they reject this lawless, authoritarian Senate bill and defend their own, previously passed bill (the RESTORE Act). I encourage everyone to sign it. You can do so here..."


Petition link...
http://action.firedoglake.com/page/petition/RestoreFISA


"Tell House Members to Stand Firm Behind the RESTORE Act!

The FISA bill passed by the Senate is a disgrace. By legalizing warrantless spying on Americans and granting retroactive amnesty to lawbreaking telecoms, the Senate seeks to ensure that the Bush administration's illegal spying programs are never investigated or subjected to the rule of law. The Senate bill is a profound betrayal of the votes of millions of Americans who voted in 2006 to put Democrats in control of Congress in order to increase, not eliminate, checks and oversight on this administration, and to restore the rule of law to our country.
The House's RESTORE Act is an infinitely superior bill. It provides real safeguards on the President's spying powers while providing him with the surveillance powers he needs to protect the country. It enables the issue of the legality of the President's spying programs to be decided where it belongs -- in a court of law. And it preserves the crucial balance that has existed for decades between enabiling necessary surveillance on Americans and ensuring that our political leaders do not abuse that power.

In the wake of the discovery of the Watergate crimes and decades of surveillance abuses, the Congress of the mid-1970s acted on a bipartisan basis to put into place safeguards to ensure that even our highest political officials must adhere to the law and can only exercise eavesdropping powers with real safeguards. The RESTORE Act continues that tradition, while the Senate bill eviscerates it. We urge Democratic House members to stand firm behind the bill they passed and not capitulate once again to the bullying, manipulative demands of the Bush administration for ever-greater unchecked power, as embodied by the warrantless eavesdropping and telecom immunity provisions of the Senate bill."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #95
96. The Senate will get away with this crap until Americans
fill the streets outside the hallowed halls and demand that they stand up for the rights of citizens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #96
101. Most people do not realize the significance of the rights that
are being given away, it's just become a battle of the parties :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #101
105. If half the people showing up at rallies
filled the capital, they'd get back their rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trashcanistanista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #96
104. People will fight back. Techies will tell us how to
override the surveilance and there will be a massive blockages of what they are trying to do. They won't even be aware of it until it is too late. Although I've lost optimism for our senators, I have faith in the ingenuity of the American people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trashcanistanista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #95
97. Done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #97
99. Thank you, at least they know some are paying attention...
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #99
100. What's that music CSpan2 is playing
Even they are energized this afternoon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #100
102. LOL. It probably has the word death or slaughter in the title :) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #102
103. Yah think
Sounds familiar -might be Tchaikovsky but I can't think of a title. I'm really not sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trashcanistanista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #103
106. Today is Lincoln's Birthday.
How dare they pass this shit on Lincoln's birthday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #106
107. Rockefeller up now
lying his ass off and trying to get the vote going.
Karma awaits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #106
108. They don't care n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
109. Quorum Call over. Leahy is up. C-SPAN 2 link here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trashcanistanista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #109
110. No, I'm seeing
McConnell right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #110
111. Correct. Server went down, I returned and clicke repost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #111
112. Quorum call now. This takes a while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #112
113. Quorum dispensed with by unanimous consent. Kit Bond up. 4.5 minutes of time left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
114. Sen. Bond just called the lawsuits against the telecoms "frivolous" My rights are NOT frivolous!
Edited on Tue Feb-12-08 05:21 PM by L. Coyote
Why is spying on EVERYONE called the "President's terrorist surveillance program"?
I am not a terrorist, Mr. Bond, and ALL Americans cannot be presumed to be terrorists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #114
115. I can't stand that man.
He would have been at home in the former soviet union.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #115
116. Reid is voting against the bill
speaking now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
117. Pretty words from
Reid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trashcanistanista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #117
118. Afer he lumped all kinds of praise
onto Rockerfeller, *'s waterboy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #117
119. He said he's voting against it n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trashcanistanista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #119
120. Reid will vote against it.
Edited on Tue Feb-12-08 05:29 PM by trashcanistanista
He's always said that. Not Rockerfeller,unless I missed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trashcanistanista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #120
122. Voting now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
121. There WILL BE a Conference Comm. if it passes the Senate. Reid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
123. Here it comes,
this is gonna hurt.....................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #123
124. I can't believe Webb voted aye. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #124
125. Feinstein no!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trashcanistanista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #125
126. Webb I heard no, but
Whitehouse aye! Feinstein NO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nictuku Donating Member (907 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #125
127. Wow - I'm surprised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trashcanistanista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #127
128. It will pass. So far 2 Dems AYE
Whitehouse and Rockerfeller.I expect Leiberman to be aye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #128
129. This is like a shell game
The vote that mattered was the immunity one and now that it has been stripped they can then vote against it knowing they will lose. They then get to say they voted against the bill. It makes me sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #123
130. Has a single Rethug voted no? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trashcanistanista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #130
131. Not that I can tell. Hagel Aye, he would be the only one
maybe, Spector also Aye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
132. After all the rhetoric
from Senator smoke screen Specter about amnesty he votes yes, a-hole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trashcanistanista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #132
133. Same with Whitehouse, I'm a little shocked at him
maybe it was a mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #132
136. He never fails to talk big and then give Bush what he want
Fuck all of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
134. Shit it passed
68 to 29.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trashcanistanista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #134
135. For the record I did not hear Clinton or Obama's names
called for this vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
137. Feingold: My Hope Is with The House
Feingold: My Hope Is with The House
By Paul Kiel - February 12, 2008, 6:11PM - http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/02/feingold_my_hope_is_with_the_h.php

Some sharp words from Sen. Russ Feingold (D-WI):

“The Senate passage of this FISA bill, while not surprising, is extremely disappointing. The Senate missed a golden opportunity to pass a bill that would give our intelligence officials the tools they need to go after suspected terrorists while also safeguarding the privacy of law-abiding Americans. Instead the Senate, with the help of too many Democrats, is yet again giving the administration sweeping new powers – and letting it off the hook for its illegal wiretapping program. I hope that our House colleagues will hold a stronger line, and refuse to accept the deeply flawed Senate bill. The calls from Americans tired of having their rights and their Constitution trampled on by this administration are only growing louder. Congress should stand up for the American people, and the Constitution, by opposing such a badly flawed bill.”

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Serial Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #137
141. My Senator - I am proud of him, but the others caved again!!
It's all about money to politicians!

DAMN!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
138. TPM: Senate Passes Surveillance Bill = LIST of Dems voting for the bill 68-29
Edited on Tue Feb-12-08 07:10 PM by L. Coyote
Senate Passes Surveillance Bill
By Paul Kiel - February 12, 2008, 5:56PM - http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/02/senate_passes_surveillance_bil.php

On a final 68-29 vote, the Senate just easily passed the surveillance bill with retroactive immunity for the telecoms intact. Once again, a large number of Dems crossed over.

Since most of the amendments that sought to add civil liberty protections to the bill were voted down, the bill that's emerging from the Senate is only a slight improvement of the administration's Protect America Act. As CQ reported this morning:

According to most experts and advocacy groups, the bill would only slightly rein in the new powers granted to the administration in the temporary law (PL 110-55).


The new bill would authorize the president to conduct warrantless surveillance of foreign targets even when they are communicating with someone in the United States.

Among the Dems voting for the bill were Sens. Jim Webb (D-VA), Kent Conrad (D-ND), Max Baucus (D-MT), Herb Kohl (D-WI), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), Evan Bayh (D-IN), Tim Johnson (D-SD), Bill Nelson (D-FL), Barbara Mikulski (D-MD), Claire McCaskill (D-MO), Blanche Lincoln (D-AR), Bob Casey (D-PA), Ken Salazar (D-CO), Daniel Inouye (D-HI), Ben Nelson (D-NE), Mark Pryor (D-AR), Tom Carper (D-DE), and Mary Landrieu (D-LA). Note: both Whitehouse and Baucus voted for the Dodd/Feingold amendment.

............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
140. VIDEO: Senator Dodd quotes Glenn Greenwald on FISA
Edited on Wed Feb-13-08 10:28 AM by L. Coyote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC