Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lieberman's Sucking Up To Mepublicans Costs Him His Delegate Status. Question:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:12 PM
Original message
Lieberman's Sucking Up To Mepublicans Costs Him His Delegate Status. Question:
okay, long question:

Joe's devolved into a consistent advocate of the Bush Administration and their asinine, unpatriotic, dangerous "policies".

If I understand this correctly, Joe had the status to do some horse-trading at our upcoming Convention. Now this status has been revoked as a result of Joe's unprofessional (let's call it what it is) conduct.

Q: Do you think Dick Cheney's pi$$ed off about this? How much?















lol




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Joe is now a man without a party...or a conscience.
Edited on Thu Feb-07-08 03:19 PM by Atman
That isn't necessarily a bad thing...except for that it is for Joe. Because his lack of conviction for anything beyond defending Israel is appalling. He is an AMERICAN Senator, and his first order of business should be the best interest of AMERICA. He seems to have forgotten that. He's a total sell-out, and I won't be happy until they move his Senate office to the janitorial closet in the basement. Or kick his ass out (but like a nuclear cockroach, we can't seem to get rid of him).

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why was he a delegate at all?
What the heck is wrong with our 'party' that this bastard had any status to begin with?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
long_green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I don't think anything is wrong here
I think the DNC went to Lieberman and I bet he realized, with all of his campaigning for McCain, he had no business being a part of the Dems nominating process. It wouldn't surprise me one bit if they were polite and he was gracious.
I may change my answer depending on how Brit Hume and Bill Kristol play this at 5pm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Like his graciousness when he lost the dem primary? wow you are generous.
Edited on Thu Feb-07-08 03:57 PM by elehhhhna
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Hello? He bolted the party to violate the primary results.
That by itself, ignoring the McCain endorsement, should have eliminated him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
long_green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. good point
I was being nice to the departed "guest." And yes, good riddance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Look for him to switch to the Republican caucus soon.
Then the Senate reverts to Repub control. It won't matter for Joe, he'll have a cabinet post regardless of who wins the WH - he isn't planning on being in the Senate after this year...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. It seems like he's begging to get kicked out of the Dem Caucus..
he's a smarmy bastard. I say let him go. And I'll personally take to the streets in protest if any Dem puts him in the cabinet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. The problem with the Senate (and to some degree, the House)
is that too many Democrats vote with the Republicans, but almost no Republicans vote with the Democrats. Seems to me that if you could get rid of the few Democrats that won't vote with the Republicans, you'd have Mr. Obama's unity, right there. That's one of the reasons Joe is in the catbird's seat - with either McCain or Obama he's sitting pretty...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC