Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Here's My Plan for a Democratic Victory in 2008

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
louis c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:17 PM
Original message
Here's My Plan for a Democratic Victory in 2008
Edited on Wed Feb-06-08 08:35 PM by louis c
First, let me give you my take on the Democratic race so far. Both Hillary and Barack have energized the voters. Nearly every primary has record Democratic turnout, even in Red States.

Hillary has really touched the hearts of women, especially those in my age group (over 50). Hispanics love her and she really has fought the hard battles over the years.

Barack is the first African-American to really have a chance to be President. That is the most loyal demographic in the Democratic coalition, and the most taken for granted. We can't win if they feel disenfranchised. I am a white male and a product of the 60's, and Barack touches me like JFK, RFK and MLK. He has energized the young just as they did in the sixties.

The Democratic base has never been as energized by two candidates for as long as anyone can remember.

We can't lose this opportunity. We must capitalize on it. We must unite our base, not divide it.

But how?

Here's my plan. The ticket must be Hillary Clinton for President and Barack Obama for VP. The important part of this is that Hillary must promise to give Barack a strong voice in her administration and she must serve only one term. Obama will run in 2012, (he'd only be 50 years old) and he can choose any running mate he wishes. This would guaranty a victory this year and a strong Democratic mandate. Hillary, because she is older, would serve first and serve only one term. Barrack would have the option of serving two.

I believe the deal is good for both politicians, the Democratic party and the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
More Than A Feeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. The promise to serve just one term means she'd be an almost instant
lame duck. Nothing personal, but that's a bad idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Because Obama....
is the heir apparent, there really is no lame duck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skinner ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think we probably would win under this plan. But I can see two problems...
1. Barack Obama isn't going to agree to be VP. At least not now, when he has a good chance of being the nominee.

2. Hillary Clinton isn't going to agree to only serve one term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Now is the perfect time
Edited on Wed Feb-06-08 08:31 PM by louis c
Since both are in doubt of the outcome.

Once one is convinced that they have the nomination sewed up, the deal is more difficult.

If we go into the convention dead locked, don't be surprised if Dean makes this happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. Dean has said (I heard him yesterday) that he wants them on the ticket together. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. Not going to happen.
Either one needs a strong white male to balance out the ticket.

Likely someone with military experience.

Wes Clark or Jim Webb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I'm worried about our base
Women, African-Americans and othe minorities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calico1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. I think that when this is all over,
the "loser" will be strongly encouraged by others in the party to work for the success of the winner. I think this is especially important if Hillary gets the nomination. Obama needs to support her and help unite the party so as not to ruin his own chances later on. Hillary too, but I think if he gets the nomination she will not seek it again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. maybe, if Barack does not get the nom and is not offered veep
or doesn't want to be veep, Obama supporters may not want to support the Hillary ticket, and then we will get John McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calico1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. Well, I was just speculating.
I have no idea at this point what will happen. I was just commenting on the OP's scenario.

Politically speaking, if he were to want to run in the future, it probably wouldn't be a good idea for him to not support Hillary if she did get the nomination. More so than for Hillary, though I feel she would also show support. This is because I think it unlikely for her to run again if he got the nod, whereas I think he would try again. Whatever happens I think that because both of them have such specific groups supporting them, there will be a lot of pressure from others in the party for them to play nice at least until after the GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calico1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. One term is = instant lame duck.
I don't think Obama would accept VP but if he did and she had 8 years he would still be a very young 54 when he ran for President. So age isn't a problem for him. Hillary would certainly not accept being a lame duck and giving her VP (who would later have the opportunity to have two terms) a lot of influence in her administration while she was very limited with her one term. Why would anyone be willing to do that?

Not a good idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. There is doubt
That's how deals are done. If she is running out of money and is facing two weeks of losses, she has a chance to make this deal.

Obama, on the other hand, needs a completely united party to have any chance. both have toned down their crisis of each other th avoid the nomination turning into an "empty box".

This deal is better than nothing, and if we don't unite, we'll get nothing.

Mike Dukakis and John Kerry won the nomination. Big deal. The only thing that really counts is November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. viable plan but Barack has to be guaranteed a strong veep
job, how is Hillary going to guarantee that? really? and I don't think Hillary would agree to one term (not right now anyway). My question now is, who will be Barack's veep? or Hillary's veep? I would like to see some names floated very soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. vp names floated soon?
ummm...we actually need a PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE first. and it's only february for god's sake.
it's waaaaaaay too early to be talking about running mates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
floridablue Donating Member (996 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
10. Hillary wouldn't even consider giving up the power.
Looks to me as usual the Democrats have backed themselves into another difficult situation. Perhaps Teddy will step forward as a compromise candidate at the convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. need a ticket before the convention, need to be united by then
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. That's pretty disgusting and sad because the PURPOSE of the convention
is supposed to be...<drum roll> to PICK the candidate!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. perhaps, but it may put us in a stronger position
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
14. Well, if I were Hillary I would tell you to take your plan and shove it. If I were Obama, I would
tell you to take your plan and shove it.
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. Except that.......
in the end (pardon the pun)we, the working class Democrats, are the ones that take it up the *&#. You see, the only way the Repubs win is if we are divided. The more unified we are, the better chance we have.

By the way, this isn't about them, it's supposed to be about us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
18. barack has more legislative experience than hillary.
he was a state senator before he was a u.s. senator.

hillary is a very divisive candidate- if she's at the top of the ticket- we lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC