Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ALA Statement on "Scrotum" controversy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 02:29 PM
Original message
ALA Statement on "Scrotum" controversy
For those of you following the widely-reported controversy on the use of the word "scrotum" in this year's Newbery-medal winning book, "The Higher Power of Lucky," here's a statement going out today from the American Library Association:



For Immediate Release
Februray 22, 2007

Statement regarding the true value of "Higher Power of Lucky"

CHICAGO - The following is a joint statement released by Kathleen T. Horning, president, Association for Library Service to Children, and Cyndi Phillip, president, American Association of School Librarians, regarding the "Higher Power of Lucky."

"Recent media coverage failed to discuss the true value of the 'Higher Power of Lucky,' by Susan Patron. The author’s use of one word should not prevent children from having free access to this remarkable piece of children’s literature. Children and their families should be given the opportunity to read this book and develop their opinions.

"The 'Higher Power of Lucky' is a perfectly nuanced blend of adventure and survival, both emotional and physical. It is a gently humorous character study, as well as a blueprint for a self-examined life. The book serves as a reminder that children support one another just as adults do.

"Libraries are about inclusion rather than exclusion. The freedom to read, speak, think and express ourselves is core to our American values. Part of living in a democracy means respecting each other’s differences and the right of all people to choose for themselves what they and their families read.

"Fortunately, most libraries do offer a full spectrum of resources and ideas from which our patrons can choose. Librarians understand that children mature at different rates and have different interests, reading abilities and life experiences. Decisions about what materials are suitable for particular children should be made by the people who know them best - their parents or guardians.

"We believe that every family should have the opportunity to read the 'Higher Power of Lucky' and that every public and school library should consider adding the book to their collections."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GoneOffShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Huzzah! What she said!
A sensible voice after all the nonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IntravenousDemilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Another instance of a literary scrotum...
La Comédie Humaine, by Honoré de BALZAC!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murielm99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. Told ya.
Librarians don't put up with all that censorship nonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. she said "spectrum "
isn't that a body part? Or an instrument a gynocologist uses? We should ban her!

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. Since when is "scrotum" a bad word?
I'm really at a loss. Are all proper names for parts of the body off-limits now? If we can't say "scrotum," I assume "anus" is equally unacceptable. Also, "solar plexus" must now be taboo. Is "skull" now verboten? Zygomatic arch? What parts of the body are we, in fact, allowed to say now?

Sheesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. you said "zygomatic arch"
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Now calm down or I'll be forced to say "external auditory meatus"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. That's it- I'm ALERTing!
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Roy Donating Member (283 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. In your ear, Dick Steele!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Ear? That's a body part too! Now I'm alerting TWICE!
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. You can't say "ear" on this website.
This is a clean website. Don't say stuff like that. LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WindRavenX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. i think that just by even having this debate it shows just how sexually repressed Americans are
I mean, my fucking god, "scrotum" is a foul word? Really? :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. It's kind of stunning in its stupidity, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WindRavenX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Sometimes, this country just makes me shake my head NT
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. just don't say cremaster
or you'll get in big trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. There's something about the word "cremaster"
that makes me want to vomit. I think it's the most disgusting word in English.

I like "scrotum" though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Psst, Kenny...
UVULA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Roy Donating Member (283 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. EEEEEEEEEEEEEKKKKK!!!!! There you go again!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. I haven't read the book, but....
... isn't it general knowledge (at least among people old enough to know what one is) that guys have scrotums? :shrug:

I personally wouldn't object to a word like "nutsack," although I can see how some people might be offended, but "scrotum"? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
23. I am alerting the DU moderators about your offensive language for typing 'nutsack' & 'scrotum' twice
Oh no! Now I've typed them! I am hereby notifying the DU moderators of my own offensive languge!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
9. Did not Sir Henry
at Rowlinson End have a wrinkled manservant named Scrotum?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
10. Man, if the word "scrotum" causes such consteration...
Forget any description of what it does in hot and cold temperatures!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Roy Donating Member (283 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
22. Meanwhile, doesn't Joe Camel kinda remind you of a..... Oh, nevermind...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC