Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Feddie Prosecutors urge 60 years for Puke Cunningham's pal Wilkes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 11:20 AM
Original message
Feddie Prosecutors urge 60 years for Puke Cunningham's pal Wilkes
Hearing put off for defense contractor

Federal probation officials are recommending that Brent Wilkes, the Poway defense contractor who was convicted of bribing former Rep. Randy “Duke” Cunningham, should be sentenced to 60 years in prison, according to court records.

Wilkes was scheduled to be sentenced on Monday, but that has been put off until Feb. 19 at the request of his lawyer, Mark Geragos. In court papers, Geragos said he needed more time to analyze and challenge the report from the federal probation office, which he received Jan. 15 – later than required under court rules.

...

A jury convicted Wilkes of 13 counts of bribery, conspiracy and wire fraud Nov. 5. Over the course of nearly a decade, prosecutors said he plied Cunningham with cash bribes of at least $625,000, lavish meals, trips and gifts.

In exchange, Cunningham used his influence to steer millions in federal contracts to Wilkes' company, ADCS Inc. of Poway.

...

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/politics/20080122-9999-1m22wilkes.html

Soooooooo...the Pukestir gets a bit over 8 years, but the guy who was NOT an elected official and therefore NOT given the public trust, the Feddies want 60 years for him?

What gives with that? (Not that 60 years in not warranted, but even with a plea bargain, a little over 8 years seems a bit light compared with what the Feddies want for the other person involved in the crimes.)

:shrug:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe they're using that 60 year threat to get more information?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. From what I read....
Edited on Tue Jan-22-08 12:14 PM by Hepburn
...the Feddies are basing that on the amount of profit that Wilkes's company made during the time. His lawyer wants to argue that some of that profit was legit and not all due to the bribes to Cunningham.

What is bothering me, however, is that Cunningham who was entrusted with the public good gets only a little over 8 years, but the guy who paid him off and is not a public servant, the Feddies want 60 years. Seems to me that Cunningham got of waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too light even with consideration of the fact that he pled out on the charges.

Edit for typo

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Didn't they set up a phony company to get Defense monies?
I seem to recall they set up a phony company and did not produce anything but took millions of Defense dollars. Every soldier that dies or died because of lack of equipment or body armor did so because the Defense spending was cheated by these two thieves and if they both spent the rest of their lives behind bars it might not be enough. IMO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. That sounds right, but I am not that up on the details of the case.
Since the Puke resigned and pled out on the charges, I really did not follow all of the details.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC