Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US Intelligence on Iran Does Not Stand Up, Say Vienna Sources

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 12:08 PM
Original message
US Intelligence on Iran Does Not Stand Up, Say Vienna Sources
Edited on Fri Feb-23-07 12:17 PM by babylonsister
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines07/0223-05.htm

Published on Friday, February 23, 2007 by the Guardian / UK

US Intelligence on Iran Does Not Stand up, Say Vienna Sources

· Tip-offs did not lead to signs of banned activity
· IAEA report raises pressure for new sanctions
by Julian Borger


Much of the intelligence on Iran's nuclear facilities provided to UN inspectors by American spy agencies has turned out to be unfounded, according to diplomatic sources in Vienna.

The claims, reminiscent of the intelligence fiasco surrounding the Iraq war, coincided with a sharp increase in international tension as the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reported that Iran was defying a UN security council ultimatum to freeze its nuclear programme.

That report, delivered to the security council by the IAEA director general, Mohamed ElBaradei, sets the stage for a fierce international debate on the imposition of stricter sanctions on Iran, and raises the possibility that the US might resort to military action against Iranian nuclear sites.

At the heart of the debate are accusations, spearheaded by the US, that Iran is secretly trying to develop nuclear weapons. However, most of the tip-offs about supposed secret weapons sites provided by the CIA and other US intelligence agencies have led to dead ends when investigated by IAEA inspectors, according to informed sources in Vienna.

"Most of it has turned out to be incorrect," said a diplomat at the IAEA with detailed knowledge of the agency's investigations. "They gave us a paper with a list of sites. did some follow-up, they went to some military sites, but there was no sign of activities."

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hmmm... Mohamed ElBaradei... why is that name familiar to me...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBaldyMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. he's chief of the IAEA inspectorate n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. ahahahaha... yes, I know that... it's written right up there, see?
No, I was recalling his history of conflict with the Republic administration... and his work with Hans Blix during the build up to the Iraq war.

Thanks though. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theoldman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. I find it hard to believe that our intelligence agencies are so
incompetent. In my opinion the problem is with the Bush regime. They take the data and distort it to achieve their political agenda. It will take many years for other countries to trust us again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBaldyMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. they didn't know the Shah was going to be overthrown and the CIA
was running the country, since the US embassy was occupied then closed down it has been even worse.

the US has been blind since then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm shocked
shocked I tells ya, shocked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. Recommend #1 - SURPRISE SURPRISE (not)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. Thanks to Bush, America's word has zero credability in world affairs...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC