Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

INTERIOR WITHHOLDING KEY DOCUMENTS ON ARCTIC DRILLING

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
nosmokes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 04:57 PM
Original message
INTERIOR WITHHOLDING KEY DOCUMENTS ON ARCTIC DRILLING
Wow!Who woulda thunk there'd be some sorta shenanigans going on about drilling in the Artic and this administration?I'm gobsmacked! I mean this is such a shocker, a complete surprise!not.The United States of Oil.
--###--

original-peer
For Immediate Release: January 17, 2008
Contact: Carol Goldberg (202) 265-7337

INTERIOR WITHHOLDING KEY DOCUMENTS ON ARCTIC DRILLING

Shell Plans for LNG and Tanker Traffic in Chukchi Sea Barred from Lease Review

Washington, DC — The Interior Department limited its environmental review of oil industry plans for drilling in Arctic waters to veil plans for building a liquefied natural gas (LNG) facility and establishing year-round tanker traffic, according to documents released today by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER). The exclusion of these plans from agency environmental reviews allowed proponents to downplay potential effects on a host of marine species, including the polar bear, endangered bowhead whale, gray whale, Pacific walrus, seals, threatened eider, and other marine birds and fish.

The Interior Department’s Minerals Management Service (MMS) has announced that it will hold Chukchi Sea Oil and Gas Lease Sale 193 on February 6, 2008. Last week, the Interior Department’s Fish and Wildlife Service revealed that it would not meet a legal deadline for it to decide whether the polar bear, for which the Chukchi Sea is important habitat, should be listed under the Endangered Species Act.

What was not announced is that MMS also decided to handle industry oil and gas development plans on a piecemeal basis. Agency documents show that MMS Regional Director John Goll ignored protests by his own staff in keeping follow-on developments that Shell Oil disclosed to the agency out of any environmental reviews. These plans include an LNG facility and deployment of icebreakers and supply vessels to facilitate regular tanker traffic through dangerous Arctic waters.

“Interior wants to pretend that the nose under the tent has no camel attached to it,” stated PEER Executive Director Jeff Ruch, noting that today the House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming opened hearings on the Chukchi Sea lease. “On the important question as to whether to open up our Arctic waters to oil development, the Interior Department should lay all the cards on the table rather than hiding an ace up its sleeve.”

At the same time, MMS has denied requests by conservation groups filed under Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) for documents that PEER has now posted. In fact, MMS is withholding the vast majority of documents that provide the basis for MMS’s environmental impact analysis. MMS has declared that roughly 5500 pages out of about 5781 pages of responsive material are exempt from production. It has redacted hundreds of pages, consisting principally of emails from MMS employees, by deleting the entire text of each email and virtually the entire text of each attachment.

Questions are being raised as to the wisdom of proceeding with the Chukchi lease sale before Endangered Species Act protections can be put in place. Revelations that MMS deliberately minimized the scope of industry plans only reinforces the impression that the Interior Department is bending rules in order to open the Chukchi, Beaufort and Bering Seas to petroleum development regardless of consequences.

“Congress should put the brakes on this stampede for lame duck leasing of federal oil and gas rights,” Ruch added, pointing to recent scandals at MMS involving multi-billion dollar oil royalty giveaways. “The Bush administration’s entire Arctic drilling agenda merits a hard look by Congress before going one step further.”

###













complete release including links to related sources here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. K, and R#5. PEER does a lot of good work. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nam78_two Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R-great post-thanks for posting this.nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lostnfound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. Just saw the president of Shell speak in person the other day
at a company event -- Hofmeister. It was bizarre. He puts on quite a show -- exuding, or feigning, righteous anger and outrage that the US stops oil companies from drilling on what he claims is "85% of the continental shelf" and how horrible and stupid this is for our country..we haven't had a national energy policy in years..we're the only net oil importer who actively prohibits exploration of resources.

But global warming is real and government-mandated flourescent light bulbs are A-okay. I suspect those are his "loss leader" topics. Didn't get to ask him how he feels about higher automobile efficiency standards. Or whether it's REALLY true that he didn't participate in Cheney's plans for Iraq, and if so, how did Shell end up faring in the Iraq oil rights grab?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC