|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 06:33 PM Original message |
Back to the Minnesota Bridge Collapse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shraby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 06:37 PM Response to Original message |
1. I guess that's a tad better excuse than |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 06:49 PM Response to Original message |
2. k&r, thanks for the update. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 07:44 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Thanks for not ignoring this awful disaster n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
superkia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 07:52 PM Response to Original message |
4. People die because of a design error and our great gooberment... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 07:56 PM Response to Original message |
5. And isn't it odd that numerous, regular inspections missed the flaw |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 07:59 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. And you are not alone n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 08:05 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Not that clearcut: Minnesota will review 59 bridges in wake of report |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 08:13 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. How are they reviewing them? Looking at paper specs or actually |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:11 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC