Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can't make this stuff if I tried .... Iran v The US Navy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 04:41 PM
Original message
Can't make this stuff if I tried .... Iran v The US Navy
U.S. officials claim Iranian speedboats swarmed three Navy warships in the Strait of Hormuz,
the narrow waterway that is the only entry and exit to the Persian Gulf. They said U.S. Navy
commanders were considering firing warning shots, before the retreat of the five Iranian
speedboats, which the Pentagon said were operated by the elite Revolutionary Guards.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22644928/wid/18298287



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. excellent response to this event posted by Ichingcarpenter yesterday....
Edited on Tue Jan-15-08 04:45 PM by mike_c
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. And not a plane or sub in sight. Who's makin' this stuff up ?
Edited on Tue Jan-15-08 04:45 PM by EVDebs
Those speedboats won't be allowed w/in explosives distance, if I remember the post USS Cole protocols. And you mean to tell me NO air power was evident during this incident ? Strait of Hormuz is where what percentage of the world's oil flows through ? And if Iran wants to ship it's moneymaking oil out what good does blocking that strait do them ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. just about 3 or 4 carriers w/ F-18s


BTW that gun or the ships missiles are radar controlled and computer they would make
anything go "boom" quick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. Just launching the planes, much less shooting anything off, ...
would be a breach of international law regarding the right to transit Iranian waters in the Straight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
23. Don't even need these expensive fighters. The little armed drones could patrol indefinitely
US To Boost Use Of Armed Drones In Iraq And Afghanistan
The Predators are flown by two to four member crews who operate the aircraft from bases in the western United States.
by Staff Writers
Washington (AFP) July 13, 2007

http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/US_To_Boost_Use_Of_Armed_Drones_In_Iraq_And_Afghanistan_999.html

and on land we have,

http://www.defensetech.org/archives/001246.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. The Straight is NOT international waters -- the ships were in Iranian waters.
They have the right of transit -- under an international treaty that the U.S. has never ratified. But that means that they must submit to reasonable questioning by Iran, have to act as if they were non-warships, cannot take agressive actions nor warn of them, are prohibited from launching aircraft, and submarines must transit the Straight unsubmerged. Not that the U.S. obeys the international rules, even though it relies on the treaty that spells them out, without ratifying it.

And all the rules go out the window when the Administration wants to pull a Gulf of Tonkin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #14
24. Or a U2 like Gary Powers, scuttled a peace conference by Allen Dulles
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
screembloodymurder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. And your point?
????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crikkett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. Ha. story link is broken or has been redirected and the story removed
cool 'artist's rendering' of the Elite Revolutionary Guards(R), saved it to my hard drive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Link still works
Navy story in the article .... the rest is nuts too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
screembloodymurder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. What are you trying to say.
I'm not following.... the story seems to have no connection to the picture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. part of the story that struck me as funny
Speedboats v Naval Destroyers

And from that they are trying to "gin up a war."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. No, they were making reasonable requests for ships transiting their waters to ID themselves.
Even the U.S. Navy version of the story noted the request for the Navy ships to identify themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. You're kidding right ? Warships flying the US flag ?
If those speedboats were anywhere near the US ships they most likely WERE on a suicide mission of some sort, whether they knew it or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. read on: from link
In a stern warning to Iran days after a Jan. 6 confrontation with U.S. warships in the Persian Gulf, Bush put Tehran on notice that it needs to be careful. The president said it would not matter to him whether an attack against an American vessel resulted from an order by the government in Iran or a rash decision by an Iranian boat captain.

“It’s not going to matter to me one way or another,” Bush said. If the Iranians hit a U.S. ship, “there are going to be serious consequences,” he said.

U.S. officials claim Iranian speedboats swarmed three Navy warships in the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow waterway that is the only entry and exit to the Persian Gulf. They said U.S. Navy commanders were considering firing warning shots, before the retreat of the five Iranian speedboats, which the Pentagon said were operated by the elite Revolutionary Guards.

Iran has denied that its boats threatened the U.S. vessels, saying the incident was a normal occurrence, and accused Washington of fabricating video and audio it released. Iran’s government has released its own video, which appeared to be shot from a small boat bobbing at least 100 yards from the American warships
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. I think the point may be that the whole idea of the U.S. navy
Edited on Tue Jan-15-08 05:05 PM by walldude
being scared of a few speedboats is ludicrous. We have the biggest, most high tech military on the planet, and according to our media and government we should be afraid of everyone. Funny, if I'm walking through the park and I'm carrying a big stick, and a man comes towards me with an AK-47, for some strange reason I think I should be scared of him not the other way around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. No, not walking in the park -- walking in my own yard with a stick.
And when I ask the guy with the AK-47 to identify himself, he threatens to shoot me if I act too threatening with the stick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #18
27. Using un-manned drone aircraft, nottomention land-based drones
which are being introduced into the Iraq/Afgan "theatres" of occupation, this "war" being all about OIL in the first place, the whole idea of the US Navy being scared of a few speedboats means that those boats should have been tracked once they left port. The same for Iranian subs and mini-subs. With the Russians we knew their every move before they left port. Read Blind Man's Bluff by Sherry Sontag and Chris Drew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. ...and don't forget that george bu$h* is the best goddam president we've ever had.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
8. One interesting wrinkle is there are NO "int'l waters" in the Strait of Hormuz
And US Navy was in violation of Int'l law by operating aircraft there.

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/JA15Ak02.html

Of course we have to find this out in the foreign press. .. argghh.. :argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. We have to attack them now!
Iran has patroll boats off it's coast? That is an act of war.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. A canal from Al Fujayrah to Dubai would make for an interesting project. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #10
22. Nice map! Can you imagine if the situation were reversed?
A fleet of Iranian Warships armed to the teeth in OUR waters, off OUR coastline?

The whole affair is ludicrous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. it was perfectly timed for the bu$h* trip to the mid-east - imo
:tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. Yep. Bush's hand was itchin' for a new sabre to rattle
I'll give Bush one thing, at least he's right about being seen as a "war-monger" .. which I saw in the news today. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lynnertic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #21
26. I think he just got one from Prince Salman


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Bone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
16. Iranian gunboats did the same thing to my ship, years ago...
Back in '89, my ship The USS New Jersey encountered some Iranian gunships going through the straights as well. I believe this occurs more than it's reported by the media. Iran simply wants to know what vessels are going into, or out of, the gulf.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC