Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How the hell is Hillary supposed to unite the country

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 10:45 AM
Original message
How the hell is Hillary supposed to unite the country
when she is dividing us? Her veiled disenfranchement efforts in Las Vegas are just so appalling to me - it makes me sick to my stomach.

Let's see, say she wins with 51% of the country (assumed that half of us would vote for her while holding our noses). Then she leads the country with only 26.5% of real support. Hell, that would just be like what we have today ! A "leader" that's only fully supported by a quarter to a third of the population.

Our big chance to make a difference in this country and the world. We deserve better than this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Her veiled disenfranchement efforts in Las Vegas"
Nonsense. Why should certain voters have a better chance than others to vote? No voter should ever get special treatment, all should have an equal right to vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Again, it wasn't a problem until she didn't get the Culinary Nod.
sour grapes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. The Teacher's Union filed the law suit, yes?
Why shouldn't they be allowed to vote in the 11 AM to 1 PM caucus?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
22. Their union leader said ithey CAN vote - it's not the teachers -
it's the janitors in the schools, supposedly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
25. With all due respect, have you been to LV? The traffic on the Strip
is outrageously slow. In addition, the casino workers have very staggered hours and don't make the wages that even teachers do.

They need this and no one had a problem with this until the endorsements were given.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. The at-large caucuses in LV casinos were agreed upon
with some of the Teachers' Union members' (at least two that I am aware of who are involved in this lawsuit were present) approval back in March. It wasn't a problem for them back then -- it was passed with unanimous consent. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. I agree -its unequal ability to vote- but the real problem is using a "caucus" rather than a primary
Edited on Tue Jan-15-08 11:38 AM by papau
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
23. But if this lawsuit wins, the culinary people will NOT have an
equal opportunity to caucus. They will be working. The casino caucus sites were set up before the Obama endorsement to allow these people to caucus. Their union got it done. This coming weekend will be busy - three day weekend. The teachers won't be working so will have ample opportunity to caucus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Traffic on the LV Strip is a bloody NIGHTMARE 24/7, too. The agreement is fair.
I've come around to this after being convinced otherwise.

I think your indictment of Clinton is pretty harsh, and this Edwards supporter will vote for her in November if I must, but the lawsuit is a sham and a half. However, I don't think HRC is DIRECTLY involved in it.

I would like to see her make a statement on it though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. The problem as I see it is that she isn't working with a neutral
half of this country hates her as much (if not more) than the other half hates Cheney.

No win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rydz777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
5. None of the candidates is capable of uniting the country. To
think so is an illusion, neither Hillary, nor Obama, nor Edwards, and certainly none of the Republicans will unite this badly fractured country.

The best we can hope for is a united Democratic Party in control of the Presidency and the Congress pushing a reform agenda in the face of continuing flak from both the Republicans and the MSM.

And the fact that we will still be at war and be in economic stagflation will only acerbate the divisions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. I agree. BUT, we can broaden - and add indies and liberal
repukes to build a coalition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
7. every primary season is divisive. dean and clark wards were much harsher than this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
9. HRC can unite as well as anyone else.
Poll yesterday shows Country divided by race.

Talk all you want about unity and just the opposite
has occured.

HRC can create as much unity as anyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlertLurker Donating Member (877 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
10. Stop making sense!
Obviously another sexist, anti-Hillary post. Why do you hate democracy?

Shut the hell up, hold your nose and vote like everyone else.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
11. Sen. Clinton is a living political expediency machine. She reacts
rather than leads. Those qualities will not help her to consolidate Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeFleur1 Donating Member (973 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. No One is Going to Unite This Country
Unless they give in to the Republicans on every issue, lead in the passage of a bill that makes Baptist the Religion of the Republic, hands over all tax money to corporations and churches, forgets about the poor and unfortunate in every way, including health care, forgets about the Constiution...and on and on and on.
What we need is a strong president who is willing to govern by following the Constitution, willing to be the people's president, and to be accountable to the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. I don't disagree. The best candidate may be the one who could
unite to a reasonable degree. That is, at least a majority approve of the administration rather than this 28% stuff we are now suffering with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. deleted
Edited on Tue Jan-15-08 12:40 PM by Laura PackYourBags
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rageneau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Like most criticisms of Hillary, yours is an opinion, not a fact.
And opinions are like assholes; Everybody has one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Yes, opinion based on fact. 1/2 the country will never vote for
her. At least half of the dems don't like her. So there you go - 25% is not unity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
13. I have no intention of uniting with the toe tapping, diaper wearing, child molesting Repigs
Just so we have that straight.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. LOL - Yep, you got that right. There is no concensus building
with many subjects - like war. I mean you either want to stay there in Iraq
or you want to bolt. No compromise position there.

Took me a minute to figure out that by unity - Obama doesn't really mean
ALL the people. Just the Dems and anyone else, with sense, to jump on
the bandwagon. But on topics - there could be unity. Most people want
out of Iraq, most want health care, most want to clean up the environment....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
If you think you can build a consensus with Repigs you have been fooled. Their idea of consensus building is telling us its their way or the highway.

:rofl:

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
15. Big Picture Time Again...
Next November you will have a couple of choices to make as to where this country goes for the next 4 years. The choices will be stark...and the stakes will be high. Do you favor a withdrawl of troops from Iraq vs. 10,000 years? Do you favor more Scalitos on the SCOTUS when two or three seats come up in the next couple years? Do you want more tax breaks for the rich...including making the boooshie cuts permanent while running up more defecits? Those are just a few of the choices.

There's a long way to go until election day...and how can anyone forecast the mood of the country and how they will or won't vote. In 1968, many considered Nixon too polarizing to win. His negatives were just as strong as Hillary's going into that election, but a divided Democratic party (similar to the ruptures we're seeing in the GOOP) along with a strong third party (Ron Paul anyone???) sure made him very electable.

If Senator Clinton in the nominee next November, your choice will be to either look forward and vote for what you think is in the best interests in the country...or continue fighting the primaries and stay home or vote for a third party. I'm surely not voting for my best friend or ideal candidate, I'm looking for the one who won't screw up this country any worse than it is...and start moving us back on the path of sanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
557188 Donating Member (494 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
17. Why do we want to unite?
Fuck the right wing.

I want a president that will challenge and fight them. Not one that wants to accept and hug them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xenotime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #17
29. Can we have one that would do away with them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
24. There is no uniting this Nation.....the Pubs are Pubs....just as one cannot change personality
the Pubs cannot change their affiliation....reluctant at best. Stubborn, Loyal, persistent, willing to ignore reason/common sense, they waddle on in this World scammin what ever stands in their way of Political ambitions...

Most of the crap describing her is Pub BS ...their goal is to weaken the Dem Party and Hillary is a target of the Pub Bullies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
27. Good question --- and it's one my small sample of Dem friends,
coast to coast have no clue how to answer.

Hopefully, it will be a moot point.

I'd like to see Hillary as a leader in the Senate; I can't fathom her as any better a "uniter" then Shrub. Though I prefer her positions (by a long shot) over his, she is just as divisive for very different reasons.

Either way --- we don't move forward (much anyway).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mutineer Donating Member (659 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
30. She can't
but there are those who just refuse to face facts where she is concerned
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
31. And obama can't even tolerate us gay people - STILL...
yes - we deserve better than him, too...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
32. the goal is not to "unite" the country - it's to get enough votes to WIN and FORCE the CHANGE...
Just enough to STOP the repuke assholes and give OUR side a chance to RESTORE the progress we were making until the REPUKES took over...

I want MORE partisanship - only repukes talk about bipartisanship crap...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LucyParsons Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
33. I don't anyone in the 'real world' who is for her
And I have a politically diverse peer group.

The rightwing have an irrational, visceral hatred for her. The leftwing (such as myself) see her as a warmongering, pro-corporate, opportunistic DLCer. I hope I am not forced to vote for her in November. The only reason I will hold my nose and vote for her is federal court appointments.

http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0021,harkavy,15052,5.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC