Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The First Amendment Gone Wild: Big Pharma’s ‘Right’ to Find Out What Doctors Are Prescribing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 02:02 PM
Original message
The First Amendment Gone Wild: Big Pharma’s ‘Right’ to Find Out What Doctors Are Prescribing
The First Amendment Gone Wild: Big Pharma’s ‘Right’ to Find Out What Doctors Are Prescribing
by Robert Weissman


The founders of the United States took the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and the concepts of free speech and freedom of conscience very seriously.

“Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech,” said Benjamin Franklin.

“Information is the currency of democracy,” intoned Thomas Jefferson — one of countless Jefferson odes to the central importance of ideas and free transmission of information in fostering a working democracy.

But could they possibly have imagined the twisted purposes to which the First Amendment is put today?

Two crucial developments in U.S. constitutional jurisprudence — the grant of Bill of Rights protections to corporations, and the extension of First Amendment protections to commercial speech — have enabled corporations to invoke the First Amendment to defend their right to hawk goods, so long as they are legal, by almost any means short of outright lying or clear deception.

Now corporations are suggesting the First Amendment should effectively immunize them from government-imposed rules related to the simple commercial exchange of information.


This new expansion of the First Amendment to block broad public regulatory powers emerges from efforts in New England to control one of the most insidious pharmaceutical marketing practices.


more...

http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/01/11/6311/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
benld74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. How can the effin lawyers working for them sleep at night?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Human Beings Are Natural Resources
To be exploited in the brave new world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's the doctors!
At some point in time, doctors are going to have to get off it and lay down the law. Why are they seeing drug reps 5 times a day? Because there is something in it for them.
They have a lot more power than they are using to stop these practices and it is time they do.

Doctor offices have no problem turning away the uninsured or making patients wait for hours but they always welcome the drug reps.
They should stop these practices and deny the reps access. If the purpose is to learn about new drugs, then have a monthly info meeting for all doctors in a city or county.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Good point; if docs made a stink, maybe people would listen. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. Take away a cooperation's person-hood and we would not be subject to
bullshit. (That's English, BTY, not French)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
7. More of the type of shit JRE would like to put a stop to..
...pharmaceutical and insurance companies interfering in the doctor-patient relationship - and thus interfering with our treatment, health, and in many cases, our very survival and quality of life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
8. Corporations should have NO 1st ammendment rights
I mean...WTF?

It's crazy that an inherently sociopathic entity should be deemed a 'person'.:mad: :mad: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
9. Corporations do not have Constitutional rights.
Only people have rights under the 1st Amendment. A corporation is not a person, and it has no 1st Amendment rights. Or, so I would argue.

The lawyers just argue what they're paid to argue. It's the Judges you have to worry about. If we get too many corporate judges in the wrong places, we end up with an oligarchy (if we're not there already).

It's so strange that intelligent people, even Judges, forget what corporations are. Corporations are legal fictions created by the state for the purpose of serving the common good of the state. As a creation of the state, the state ought to be able to regulate them at will and restrict them or abolish them if they no longer serve the public interest. Corporations certainly, as agents of the state, ought not to have rights granted to people. Those rights are in place to protect the people from the state--not to protect the state (corporations) from itself (the government).

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
10. K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC