Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Warning - one method the insurance companies use to deny benefits - please read

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
midlife_mo_Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 10:49 AM
Original message
Warning - one method the insurance companies use to deny benefits - please read
Edited on Fri Jan-11-08 11:28 AM by midlife_mo_Jo
1) I had two biopsies and then a lumpectomy. Three different procedures on different days.

2)My insurance company pre-approved the surgery, the day-surgery hospital, the anesthesiologist, the surgeon. This is undisputed.

What is disputed is whether or not the the lab (pathologist) was pre-approved. The insurance company states that my surgeon did not "pre-approve the pathologist" so they are refusing to pay for those bills. Get this: the lab is on my list of providers, anyway, and my surgeon's staff assures me that they did notify the insurance company which lab was being used.

So, the staff at the doctor's office says they pre-approved, lab says they didn't have anything to do with it, and insurance company says lab wasn't pre-approved. Notice, nowhere in this saga did "I" do anything wrong.

WHAT IN THE HELL DID THE "INSURANCE COMPANY" THINK MY SURGEON WOULD DO WITH THE TISSUE THAT WAS REMOVED? THROW IT IN THE TRASH?

Anyway, I was treated for breast cancer last year. My prognosis is excellent - the very best. I'm done, I'm healed, I'm going on with my life. So please don't bother to make personal comments about my health. Truly, I'm fine. I just wanted to warn everyone of another possible scam by insurance companies.

You know, I'm not completely opposed to the concept of insurance companies. In the past, I've dealt with companies that paid all my bills, no questioned asked. I gave birth to a child with serious problems - total bill around $300,000, and we paid a $200. deductible with NO attempt to get one more dollar from us, but the unregulated state of things and the greed is totally destroying this industry.

Please recommend if you'd like others to read this. Thanks. (Is it ok to ask that?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LiberalHeart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. When my daughter had an approved surgery...
...her insurance company refused to pay the anesthesiologist's bill because he wasn't the one named on the request her doc put through in the paperwork. The one named wasn't working that day and this other guy, not in their plan, was on duty. I guess they should have just kept her awake during the cutting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Journeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 04:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
35. My 1 year old daughter had surgery for a congenital condition . . .
everything went according to plan and with the insurance company's approval, but when the bills were presented we were denied because it was "a pre-existing condition."

WTF?

Many messages, many snarky comments ("I was unaware we could only give birth to healthy children"), and months of persistent badgering, I finally got a lawyer to help me get what I thought we'd paid for all those many years.

That was over 20 years ago. And from what I read these days, it's worse now than it was then.

Single payer universal coverage. Womb to tomb. It's the only sensible approach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. Wow that is disgusting
What part of "insurance" don't the insurance companies get?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. They only want to insure well people. simple as that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MorningGlow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #4
17. My brother was turned down for insurance coverage
He has IBS. They said it was too high risk, too life threatening. IBS??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. I'm uninsurable because I had a crohn's flare up in 1984. I had
to get a job at a place that had group insurance. That meant I had to take time away from my business to work at the post office so I could get insurance. Sucks.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. Please forgive my response, but what candidate do you
think could clean up this industry?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midlife_mo_Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. I've been pretty vocal that I'm for John Edwards.
He may have a small chance of winning, but I think there's still a chance.

I have other reasons for supporting him, but I won't clutter the thread by going off topic. I just wanted to warn people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dragonlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
38. I agree. It will be a tough fight, and we need a fighter
John Edwards is the one who knows this and is "ready from day one" to do it.

Hi, Midnight! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
5. I sympathize with your situation
Re: insurance companies.

Did you see Sicko? Insurance companies do hire people to comb through your bill looking for things to reject on the flimsiest of excuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midlife_mo_Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Oh, yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
6. I had a lab bill that I disputed for two years
(I won't go into the lengthy discussion, but basically, I went to the wrong lab because my doctor gave me the referral slip and the lab told me they were a provider when in fact they weren't)

I challenged it for two years, refusing to pay the lab and arguing with both the lab and the insurance.

I think they all just got sick of it. One day, almost exactly two years later, some big wig in billing at the lab just caved and said fine, we'll write it off.

It was the doctor and the lab's error, not mine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zorahopkins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
7. I'm So Glad You're Better. One Question, Though
I'm so glad you are better. As a cancer survivor myself, I know how terrible it can be.

I am wondering how much your insurance company is trying to stick you for.

Will you have to pay the lab bills?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midlife_mo_Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. I have no intention of paying it, but my husband is worried
about collection agencies and credit reports.

At this point, I really don't give a damn. I just want to pay out my debts, and never borrow again, anyway!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midlife_mo_Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #7
15.  A few thousand.
Edited on Fri Jan-11-08 11:30 AM by midlife_mo_Jo
That's three separate procedures where breast tissue was sent to the lab, as well as tissue from a sentinel node biopsy (negative).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
11. My wife is having a goround with UHC right now.
The doctor put her on insulin for her diabetes. She needs to take a class on it. UHC says this is "major medical" and not diabetes maintenance. The difference is instead of a $30 copay they want her to shell out $450 we don't have. We're drafting a letter to the state insurance commission right now. A few years back when I was on NYlcare, I needed surgery and it was taking them forever to approve it. After 4 months of waiting I fired off a letter that included this

I AM IN CONSTANT PAIN, I AM UNABLE TO PERFORM SIMPLE BASIC TASKS. MY WIFE HAS TO BRUSH MY HAIR AND TIE IT BACK, PUT MY SOCKS ON FOR ME BUT I AM NOT GOING TO ASK HER TO WIPE MY REAR END FOR ME.
AS FAR AS I CAN TELL, THIS CONSTANT NEEDING A REFERRAL APPROVED EVERY TIME MY DOCTOR WANTS TO DO SOMETHING IS DESIGNED THROUGH DELIBERATE DELAY AND OBFUSCATION TO DISCOURAGE A PATIENT FROM GETTING MEDICAL TREATMENT. I AM STRESSED, ANGRY AND FRUSTRATED AND SERIOUSLY CONSIDERING CONSULTING MY ATTORNEY TO SEE IF THIS CAN SOMEHOW BE SPEEDED UP.

I sent this to them marked CC to the Texas State Insurance Commission and to my attorney.
Two days after I mailed this, my surgeon calls and asks "Are you ready for surgery on Thursday"
Amazing how fast it was suddenly done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
12. I've noticed there's a piece of paper that makes *you* responsible for *everything*
Edited on Fri Jan-11-08 11:10 AM by KansDem
I became an unwilling participant in corporate healthcare after a major health crisis during the summer of 2003. I noticed just about every time I signed a pile of papers, there was always one making me responsible for all payments, even those that I had no control over. And sure enough, many times I was told to check on something because the insurance company refused to pay. For example, I was taken by ambulance to the hospital. Cost: about $900. Well, the insurance company refused to pay because some minor detail was inaccurate. Meanwhile, the ambulance company was sending me letters wanting payment. This went back and forth for almost a year before it was resolved (I think someone at the insurance company finally called the ambulance company and worked it out).

The point is: the insurance company doesn't want to **** with the health-care provider and the health-care provider doesn't want to **** with the insurance company. So they make the patient the go-between to either cough-up the cash or resolve differences that will cough-up the cash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
13. Would you all be willing to name the ins. co's involved in these practices?
If you don't wish to, I understand. I really have no right to ask. So far, I haven't had any problems with ours not conforming to their promises. We have BCBS, and other than the annual $200 deductible and that damn 80/20 for all hospital coverage that has left us with bills of $2,500 for 2 years in a row (which we can't really afford), they have at least paid their portion per their commitment.

I'd like to see if there are certain ins. co's who are more prone to try to scam you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midlife_mo_Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. It's not one of the big names most people would recognize
And we do have insurance through my husband's employer, which is fully paid for by the company.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fed-up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
16. I have to ship my neck/head traction unit back as "that model isn't covered" despite pre-approval
What is pre-approval good for if some lackey down the road can then reverse the decision? Why wasn't my physical therapist told only certain models were okay.

I have BCBS through medi-cal...

more like I have BS through medi-cal...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midlife_mo_Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. That's totally insane.
Sorry about your problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. When my son's arm was paralyzed from a Brachial nerve injury
Edited on Fri Jan-11-08 07:26 PM by SoCalDem
we paid out of pocket for a muscle stimulator thingie..cost $200 a month to rent the damned thing, but while the nerve regenerated, we could not risk having the muscles wither away..
The doctor wrote TWO letters and made a phone call, and they still reused to cover it.. It took 18 months, but he got back about 95% use of the arm..

if we had known how long it would take, we could have bought one..but who knows how long an injury will take to heal..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philly_bob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
19. Outrage! My insurer didn't want to pay for anesthesia on colonoscopy! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midlife_mo_Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. That sucks.
I've had one, and I had anesthesia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #19
37. Geez, you can have cardiac rhythm changes during a procedure
like that so you really need some anesthesia for that one reason alone.

Maybe we should ask the insurance committee if they want that big snakey scope stuck up their asses without anesthesia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caria Donating Member (241 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
20. Keep resubmitting it
A friend who used to deny claims for a living told me that her employer had determined that most Americans will just go ahead and pay if the company denies a claim. Of those who fight it, almost all think in baseball "3 strikes you're out" terms. So her instructions were not to pay until a claim was submitted for the 4th time.

I had a lot of trouble with my HMO when I had BC too. Hang in there!

Caria
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midlife_mo_Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Oh, I intend to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caria Donating Member (241 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. And keep careful records
(you probably already are)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
26. To me, this is bizarre to even have to think about this stuff
Are these the battles you have to go through to get a life or health-saving procedure when you HAVE insurance?

You really have to fight these leaches for every dollar?

That is so messed up.

For me, health care is simple. I'm sick. I go to the doctor or the hospital. I'm treated. I walk out.
My wallet never leaves my pocket, except to show my health card.

Why is this such a difficult concept for Americans?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Oh we GET it!
In the NECK we get it!.. Everyone who has had any protracted procedure has run up against the insurance companies favorite dodges..

Thirty years of calling a National Health Plan "socialism" and "communism".. along with enforced ignorance imposed by complicit media coporations has paralyzed the populace.

The movie "SICKO" has punched a few holes in the box and let a little light in, and more people are furious than ever before.

I wish I knew how long it will take to get our "leaders" to bow to the inevitable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. I saw SICKO a few months ago
And even I was tempted to write a Congressman. And I don't even have one!

Your politicians must have hearts of stone to watch that movie and NOT be moved to change things. I suspect that many have studiously avoided watching it.

There's a lot of unrest out there. Whoever can tap into that could be the next president.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosemary2205 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
27. I am a Benefits Administrator.
Your first step is actually your husband's Benefits Administrator. They may have a contact within your insurer's office that handles these kinds of snaffus. If that company is too small to carry any weight with the carrier, or cannot help you then........

Sometimes the Billing office at the doctor's office can be of great help. Treat them as your ally rather than an enemy trying to pry money out of you and they are more likely to bend over backwards to help you resolve the issue. If that doesn't work either then.........


You MUST

1. Keep a record of every day, every time you call and exactly who you talked to for both the insurance and the billing office of the doctor and or lab and or hospital.

2. Put EVERYTHING in writing. Including keeping a written diary of every single thing you do regarding this situation.

3. Find out IMMEDIATELY what the appeal process is for your insurance carrier is. It's likely they will have a form for you to fill out but you may just need to write a letter to a specific person at a specific address. Do this RIGHT NOW. Detail everything. And I do mean DETAILS. You may need the help of the insurance coordinator at the doctor's office who got the pre-approval. You will need the date each procedure was pre-approved, any pre-approval code that was given, and both the ICD9 and CPT codes for the diagnosis and procedures the pre-approval concerned. Detail everything. -- SEND THE FORM OR YOUR LETTER CERTIFIED, RETURN RECEIPT. Delivery confirmation isn't good enough - you need a signature. Don't forget to keep a copy of every form, every letter you fill out or send.

4. Contact your State's insurance commissioner. Every state seems to put this office under something different so it may take a little homework - your state rep or senator (not your US congressman but your STATE rep) can possibly help you get in contact with the office that regulates health insurance in your State. -- Find out what the law is regarding filing an appeal with your insurance carrier. - Most states give the carrier 30-60 days to respond to an appeal but it's important for you to know exactly what the law is.

5. If your carrier denies the appeal, that office you contacted previously in your State government may be able to negotiate with your carrier to get the bills paid. Normally they do not get involved until after you have done what you can to resolve the issue through your carrier.

6. The last stop is a lawsuit. You are probably stuck with arbitration. Surprisingly, from what I've seen, when it's just a matter of paying the bill, the arbitrators tend to go against an insurance carrier if the request is in any way reasonable.

Good luck -- I do this everyday and it's no picnic for a sane healthy person. I did it with Prudential when I was quite ill and that was enough to make a sane person insane. I don't envy you at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Thank you Rosemary
I'm about to embark on some supposedly covered elective surgery... I have copied your list and saved it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midlife_mo_Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. Thank you so much.
I hope you have this saved somewhere so you can help others with it. (Although I suspect you already have!)

Thanks, again!

My very best to you. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
32. An authorization is generated whenever the insuranse company pre-approves something
Your surgeon either has a pre-auth number for the lab work or it doesn't. If he doesn't it is likely that someone in his office dropped the ball on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
33. I once read (in the New York Times, no less) an article in which
an insurance company CEO ADMITTED that his company routinely denies every insurance claim possible the first time, in the hope that the doctor/patient will give up and just eat the expense.

I wish I could remember when that article appeared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
34. I'm a survivor, too
went through health insurance problems also, as my husband had changed jobs (and insurance companies) just prior to when I found a lump.

The new insurer tried to jerk us around, saying it was a pre-existing condition, but my health care provider ignored them, got me into treatment and dealt with them later. They eventually paid. Not all health care providers do that today.

A problem many uninsured women have today is, if they pay out of pocket for a mammogram and have a suspicious result, hospitals will refuse to let them make an appointment for diagnostic screening or a biopsy. They get bounced around until they find someone who will do the diagnostic work for a large cash down payment. The problem - if a hospital diagnoses you, they are obligated to treat you, ergo they will refuse to diagnose you.

My solution is something akin to a health care provider firing squad, but hopefully cooler heads will prevail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ms. Toad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
36. Appeal it.
I am a veteran of fights with insurance companies, and I've won every one except the couple that I didn't follow through on because I was too busy handling other complicating events in my life at the time.

Make the point that you have no knowledge of who the hospital/physician chose (would choose) to use for the lab and there was nothing under your control as to which tests were done or where they were sent for verification. At best, the insurance company will eat the fees. At worst, the surgeon didn't comply with his contract and he will feel the financial hit.

That has worked for me when the hospital used anesthesiologist for emergency surgery and no anesthesiologist groups within 50 miles were on their approved list (insurance company paid it), as well as when the approved radiological technician sent the films to a non-provider radiologist for reading (doctor paid it, per his contract with the insurance company).

If anything is under your control, it is harder to fight - like if you went to a specialist and did not personally call to the insurance company to check and make sure the approval was processed before the visit. When something like what happened to you occurs, and you have no control over it, its a much easier battle.

The funniest one was when I had a biopsy to take a snip out of a mole that fell within the A-B-C guidelines for cancerous changes. Only a snip of the mole was removed, for the express purpose of biopsying the tissue to make sure it wasn't cancerous. They paid for the tissue analysis, but refused to pay for the "surgery" to remove it since it was "cosmetic." Pointing out that the mole was not visible to any but my intimates, that only part of the mole was removed, and that if I were going to remove a mole for cosmetic purposes it would have been the one in the middle of my face didn't sway them. What finally did was my question as to whether they would refuse to pay for a lumpectomy to remove a suspicious lump because it was cosmetic breast reduction surgery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC