|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Mr_Jefferson_24 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 01:01 AM Original message |
Kucinich calling for recount... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 01:05 AM Response to Original message |
1. Hopefully we'll put the fraud stuff to bed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mr_Jefferson_24 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 01:11 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. The only way to put the question of fraud... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 02:17 AM Response to Reply #1 |
17. We can't put the "fraud stuff to bed" all we can do is let 'em know we're watching. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lvx35 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 01:08 AM Response to Original message |
2. Its good. It it really only $2000? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
2rth2pwr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 01:20 AM Response to Original message |
4. The hand recounting of paper ballots can also be rigged. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mr_Jefferson_24 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 01:21 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. And therefore what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
2rth2pwr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 01:30 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. How can the results be trusted? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seriousstan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 01:35 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. NEVER!!! Unless I personally verify them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
2rth2pwr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 02:03 AM Response to Reply #7 |
13. Exactly. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 01:36 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. get on the election board--go volunteer to work a precinct and stay |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
2rth2pwr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 02:04 AM Response to Reply #8 |
14. You trust me in the same room with the ballots? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 02:15 AM Response to Reply #14 |
16. hey--you & your friends will be monitored by other monitors as well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mr_Jefferson_24 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 01:40 AM Response to Reply #6 |
10. They can be trusted when the process is open, transparent, and verifiable... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 01:44 AM Response to Reply #4 |
11. True, but it's a lot harder than a rigging a computerized count. It requires someone to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
2rth2pwr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 02:14 AM Response to Reply #11 |
15. Not really that difficult. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 10:59 AM Response to Reply #15 |
22. Thank you for demonstrating my point. It's hard to dispose of the evidence. the same |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 02:19 AM Response to Reply #4 |
18. Rigged to match the previously rigged electronic count? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
2rth2pwr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 02:50 AM Response to Reply #18 |
19. If the electronic count wasn't rigged, there would be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 03:00 AM Response to Reply #19 |
20. ... and no practical way to rig the paper ballots *to match*. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
2rth2pwr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 03:11 AM Response to Reply #20 |
21. see post #15. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 01:40 AM Response to Original message |
9. THANK GOD! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 01:47 AM Response to Original message |
12. k&r |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:26 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC