Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

secure e-voting

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DetlefK Donating Member (449 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 11:07 AM
Original message
secure e-voting
The European Institute for System Security (EISS) at the university of Karlsruhe (GER) has developed a new method to guarantee fair and re-countable electronic elections.
The first real-world-test to this method will take place next week in the elections of the students' parliament of the university.

This method is called BingoVoting, as it relies on a random-number-generator to certify your vote's printed voucher. The random-number-generator is easier to protect, than the whole election computer.

links:
http://www.bingovoting.de/material.html

also mentioned in a book:
Jens-Matthias Bohli, Jörn Müller-Quade, Stefan Röhrich: "Bingo Voting: Secure and coercion-free voting using a trusted random number generator", Vote-ID 2007, Bochum, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Volume 4896, Pages 111-124, Springer-Verlag, 2007
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. The simplest, cheapest, most secure voting security: 100% handcount of
paper ballots--whether of electronic voting paper ballot backup, or a straight paper ballot system.

More technology means more cost--and more cost, and more complication, has, so far, been accompanied by astronomically increased risk of quick, invisible, massive vote stealing.

And you have to ask: Why were extremely insecure, insider riggable e-voting systems installed in the first place? And after you choke over the answers to that highly relevant question, we need to ask: Is MORE private technology really the answer? More billions and billions of taxpayer dollars into the pockets of the very election theft industry that has fucked us over, time and again?

IF we were in a pristine situation, with no bloody history--say, with the half a million-plus dead people in Iraq still alive--maybe I'd go for "BingoVoting." But we're not. We're in a royally fucked over situation, with lots and lots and lots of dead people, and tortured people, and a looted treasury, and a shredded Constitution, and an extremely corrupt opposition party, and we need to pull back to the simple, old-fashioned principle of COUNTING EVERY VOTE.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC