Well Diebold won again
gaiilonfong
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue Jan-08-08 10:43 PM
Original message
jlake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue Jan-08-08 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
AX10
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue Jan-08-08 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. OMG! Is that all you have.
WinkyDink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue Jan-08-08 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. Think Huckabee will ask for a re-count?
book_worm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue Jan-08-08 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. if you can provide some evidence then I'll take you seriously
Truth2Tell
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue Jan-08-08 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
Stinky The Clown
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue Jan-08-08 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
Ioo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue Jan-08-08 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. Live Chickens like tuna salad
See I can make pointless statements too
Pavulon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue Jan-08-08 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
Invalidate the process rather than examine the trends and see why people may have voted differently than they polled. Come on, this really is a slack way to respond.
OzarkDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue Jan-08-08 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. Remind me of what Obama did about election fraud
I doubt that's what happened this time, but perhaps he should rethink his position of remaining silent on the issue.
avaistheone1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue Jan-08-08 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. I agree this voting machine fraud issue is going to come to bite all these Dems in butt.
How many of them of done anything about it? We're to blame too. How many of us have a handle on this issue? Most Dems'level of interest and knowledge is pathetic. No wonder the voting machines can continue to work for their corporate and Republican masters. This is a no brainer.
ImpeechBush
(99 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue Jan-08-08 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
10. This is a joke, right?
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Jan-09-08 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #10
Freddie Stubbs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue Jan-08-08 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yes, and there is nothing you can do to stop Hillary from stealing the White House
Raiden
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue Jan-08-08 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
12. Just stupid. Hillary won fair and square!
I couldn't be more upset right now, but why would Diebold let McCain win and Romney (the Republican establishment's choice) lose? Just be gracious and accept that Hillary did the impossible...don't minimize her amazing victory!
Lex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue Jan-08-08 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
Marrah_G
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue Jan-08-08 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
15. No... Democracy won tonight
Record numbers of voters came out to have their say. These folks don't normally vote in primaries and therefore where not counted in the polls. There is no conspiracy, just good old fashioned democracy.
dailykoff
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue Jan-08-08 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
16. So those record crowds turned out to be for Hillly?
And then melted away? This does seem a little odd.
Maven
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Jan-09-08 02:35 AM
Response to Original message
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Jan-09-08 02:39 AM
Response to Original message
18. "Unbelievable" is so last century. n/t
sjdnb
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Jan-09-08 02:45 AM
Response to Original message
Especially, given the Gloat-O-Bama after Iowa. But, we all knew it was a matter of time before substance caught up with celebrity.
Donnachaidh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Jan-09-08 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
20. feasting on sour grapes?
After all, that 15 point lead Obama supporters were claiming just.wasn't.there. So of course it's GOT to be something else?
Perry Logan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Jan-09-08 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
21. So why didn't any of the Obama people see this coming?
hayu_lol
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Jan-09-08 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. So why didn't Dennis do something about Diebold?
After all, Diebold does it's dirty business in Ohio. Gee, you would think some of these naysayers would be more comfortable at freerepublic. You can say almost anything there.
Snarkturian Clone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Jan-09-08 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
24. If you believe all the elections are going to be rigged,
why bicker over candidates? The repuke nominee would win no matter what right? Seems like a big waste of time and energy to argue over all these candidates if Diebold is going to decide it...
Freddie Stubbs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Jan-09-08 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
25. Diebold backed McCain?
LostinVA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Jan-09-08 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
26. You can make alot of whine out of those sour grapes
Imagevision
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Jan-09-08 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
27. Bottomline: Diebold continues to control elections, "we'll just have to trust them"...or
go bat-shit when Hillary is upumteen % over the repug candidate and on election day, we'll be informed that the polls got it all wrong. Is that what it'll take?
Beelzebud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Jan-09-08 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
28. People like you are turning a real issue into a joke.
Good luck reforming the system when you sound like an uninformed conspiracy theorist.
Zywiec
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Jan-09-08 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
29. So Diebold now works for the Democrats?
Echo In Light
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Jan-09-08 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. Depends on how one perceives the term, and the aim
Zywiec
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Jan-09-08 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #30
33. So who will they work for in November? n/t
Echo In Light
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Jan-09-08 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. Whomever the behind the scenes corporatists decide we've "elected"
"We got a thousand points of light for the homeless man We got a kinder, gentler machine-gun-hand" ~ Neil Young
JackRiddler
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Jan-09-08 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
31. The mere fact that their machines were used was their victory...
including the model that was the very same one exposed as infinitely vulnerable to no-evidence fixing in the HBO documentary. That seven years into the exposure of the potentials for electronic vote fraud these machines are still in use anywhere (still being purchased in some places) is a clear enough victory.
Clinton Crusader
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Jan-09-08 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
32. I wasn't aware Deibold had switched party affiliations. n/t
Echo In Light
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Jan-09-08 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #32
34. There is only one party - the corporate party, w/2 right wings
Elspeth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Jan-09-08 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
35. The exit polls agreed with the results. There is no voter fraud issue
If you're pissed off, be angry at the media that built up the pre-election polls into a big bloody deal.
Echo In Light
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Jan-09-08 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. Incidentally, I'm not personally angry over NH, and haven't researched polls...
Because in this instance I don't see it as being that crucial. Irrespective of candidates, electronic voting obviously needs to be done away with.
Elspeth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Jan-09-08 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. I'm with you on electronic voting. That is why we need to pick our cases carefully
and not cry wolf over every election result we may not like. The 2000 election was destroyed by the Supreme Court. The 2004 seems to have been a result of voter fraud on many levels, including the Dielbold machines.
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)
Sun May 05th 2024, 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.