Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

As Obama Emerges, GOP Gets Murkier - Charlie Cook

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 04:20 PM
Original message
As Obama Emerges, GOP Gets Murkier - Charlie Cook
As Obama emerges, GOP gets murkier
Democratic race could end early, with Republicans in a much longer fight

ANALYSIS
By Charlie Cook
updated 1 hour, 34 minutes ago

<snip>

WASHINGTON - What a difference a couple of weeks make! It wasn't long ago that Sen. John McCain's candidacy looked dead, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney looked on pace to win in Iowa and New Hampshire, and former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee appeared to be a novelty candidate. On the other side of the aisle, Illinois Sen. Barack Obama was raising a lot of money but just didn't look like he could close the formidable advantage that New York Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton had built in both Iowa and New Hampshire.

Now here we are on primary day in New Hampshire, and it looks as if Huckabee's win in Iowa effectively put the brakes on Romney's momentum in what might be the best comeback since Lazarus rose from the dead. McCain appears to have an excellent chance of edging out the former Massachusetts governor today. On the other side, Obama has become a phenomenon, and now a Clinton win would constitute an upset.

The reality of Obama's strength dawned on me on caucus night in Iowa, walking into the auditorium of the Callahan Middle School in a working-class neighborhood in western Des Moines and finding half the room filling up with Obama supporters. In expressing their initial preference, 174 out of 365 attendees stood with Obama, with another 63 seats occupied by Clinton backers, 55 more for former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards, 29 for New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, 13 for Ohio Rep. Dennis Kucinich, 12 for Delaware Sen. Joseph Biden, six for Connecticut Sen. Christopher Dodd and 16 uncommitted. But what was more interesting was that the Obama section did not look like a fraternity or sorority party. While there were certainly more young people seated in the Obama camp than in the others, his supporters encompassed a remarkable range of ages. Obama benefited from having more young people, but his victory cannot simply be attributed to a lot more kids turning out than normal. Simply put, there were a lot of Obama backers there who were not young and were not black. They were white and middle-aged or older. In a few cases, there appeared to be young people accompanied by aging grandparents, all caucusing for Obama. The Illinois senator has made the transition from being a candidate to being a movement.

The Democratic nomination fight may not be over, but the landscape has completely changed. Assuming an Obama victory tonight, it is unrealistic to expect Clinton and Edwards to both fold their tents. But whichever one continues on would have to run a slash-and-burn "Stop Obama" campaign. Such a maneuver would very likely create a backlash and encounter an enormous amount of pressure to cease and desist.

Whether Democrats should nominate Barack Obama or not is for someone else to decide. It remains to be seen whether he can successfully address concerns about his inexperience. But this nomination may well be settled before the answer to that question is known. Democrats now seem to want to nominate Obama and look very likely to do so unless he quickly appears to be a risk. It will be very difficult for either Clinton or Edwards to successfully raise those doubts at this point without rendering themselves unelectable as well.

<snip>

Link: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22558535/

Ya know... Edwards might just be playing this thing perfectly. Let Hillary go slash & burn in an attempt to hold on to this thing, and thereby eliminating herself at the same time. Then it will become a matter of how much change\experience Democrats want regarding Edwards and Obama.

And I have no problem with the both of them on the national ticket.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. "transition from being a candidate to being a movement"
The "hope" movement?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Sorry, I just got back from a movement.
What did I miss?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU9598 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. Cool
Edited on Tue Jan-08-08 04:30 PM by DU9598
Charlie as at my caucus in Des Moines on caucus night. It was pretty entertaining seeing his surprise at the huge turnout that night. We went from about 160 participants in 2004, to 365.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
importDavid Donating Member (109 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. I totally agree!
Once one of them has the nomination I do not have any qualms about either a "Edwards / Obama" or "Obama / Edwards" ticket.

They would simply be an unstoppable force.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC