Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

More freeper spelling and logic disasters

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
begin_within Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 10:56 PM
Original message
More freeper spelling and logic disasters
"The reason Republicans won't particiapte is simple. Now is a serious time that requires serious debate and is time to see what a politition realy thinks. The IdiotTube debate was a joke, full of leading questions, false premises and gimmicks. Just as democrats are cowards and afraid to answer a question on Fox news, the IdiotTube questioners were mostly cowards, hiding their identity and hiding behing stupid gimmiks. How can anyone take these people seriously. These are the same people who get their daily news from the comedy central channel, and it shows. I have no respect for anyone that would pander to the uninformed and stupid by participating on such a (I hesitate to call it a debate) debate. Some questions that need to be asked of dems are: Can Obama name any accomplishment besides being black. Can Shrillary please explain her stance on womens rights while Bubba was assaulting, raping and demeaning women. Why should we trust Edwards after all the junk science and lies he promoted in a court room under oath. But of course the liberal media will never challenge a liberal polition on anything. The writer of this aritcle should either quit drinking the George Soros cool-aid and have an original thought or go to jonestown and do the right thing....and take the rest of the cool aid drinkers with you."

"Hey Jared, every war back in the 20th century started while a democrat was president. And lets not forget that FDR (a lib) is the only president to suspend habeus corpus, spy on american citizens, jail people for what they said and imprision a whole sector of the population based solely on their race. But of course hippocrats (rhymes with democrats..get it?) applaud him for going to war with Germany who never attacked us. BRING THE TROOPS HOME FROM GERMANY, END THE ILLEGAL OCCUPATION OF EUROPE, WE'VE BEEN THERE LONG ENOUGH. FREE OUR TROOPS FROM JAPAN, SIXTY YEARS IS ENOUGH!!!!!!"

From: http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/07/republican-cand.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ha! I always appreciate it when someone posts this stuff on DU, so I can read it
without having to endure goiong to the places where it's found.

I especially liked the part about "politition."

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
begin_within Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I'd like to see the hippocrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KitchenWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. Shouldn't the GOP be renamed to be the Hippocrat Party?
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Not hippocrats?
Cause that one did it for me.

I'd also like to point out that George Soros was spelled correctly, with the proper capitalization, yet, somehow, "cool aid" was too difficult to get right.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
begin_within Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. The hippocrats had their own debate:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. LOL
They challenge the soon-to-be-Residents at noon, right after they take the Hippocratic Oath:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
begin_within Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Then after the oath, they all celebrated with
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackBeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Poppy Bush was a Democrat? News to me.
And his son didn't suspend "habeus corpus"?

What reality do these freaks live in?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
begin_within Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Whatever is fed to them by the R noise machine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kineneb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
8. got spell check? nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal In Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. Nien. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
begin_within Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. Yes but he never learned how to use it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
9. One of the many documents that should be stapled to every freeper's head...
http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/timeline/germany-declares.htm

German Declaration of War against the U.S., 12/11/1941.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. No shit
They sure love to trot that canard out against Roosevelt at every opportunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal In Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Beat me to it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal In Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
15. Lincoln, a repub, suspended Habeas Corpus.
Here's the story:
As the Civil War started, in the very beginning of Lincoln's presidential term, a group of "Peace Democrats" proposed a peaceful resolution to the developing Civil War by offering a truce with the South, and forming a constitutional convention to amend the U.S. Constitution to protect States' rights. The proposal was ignored by the Unionists of the North and not taken seriously by the South. However, the Peace Democrats, also called copperheads by their enemies, publicly criticized Lincoln's belief that violating the U.S. Constitution was required to save it as a whole. With Congress not in session until July, Lincoln assumed all powers not delegated in the Constitution, including the power to suspend habeas corpus. In 1861, Lincoln had already suspended civil law in territories where resistance to the North's military power would be dangerous. In 1862, when copperhead democrats began criticizing Lincoln's violation of the Constitution, Lincoln suspended habeas corpus throughout the nation and had many copperhead democrats arrested under military authority because he felt that the State Courts in the north west would not convict war protesters such as the copperheads. He proclaimed that all persons who discouraged enlistments or engaged in disloyal practices would come under Martial Law.

Among the 13,000 people arrested under martial law was a Maryland Secessionist, John Merryman. Immediately, Hon. Roger B. Taney, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States issued a writ of habeas corpus commanding the military to bring Merryman before him. The military refused to follow the writ. Justice Taney, in Ex parte MERRYMAN, then ruled the suspension of habeas corpus unconstitutional because the writ could not be suspended without an Act of Congress. President Lincoln and the military ignored Justice Taney's ruling.

Finally, in 1866, after the war, the Supreme Court officially restored habeas corpus in Ex-parte Milligan, ruling that military trials in areas where the civil courts were capable of functioning were illegal.

Copyright, 1999
American Patriot Network

It does get tedious having to point out history to rpukes.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. And John Adams was the first President to jail people because of what they said.
He was also our first conservative President, and ruled in his office like a king.

I understand that a film (with Tom Hanks involved) is in the works dased on the David McCullough historical whitewash book. Nevermind the Alien and Sedition acts or the jailing of media figures for their "insults", Adams kept us out of war with France blah blah (Adams good, Jefferson bad is the McCullough refrain). A better tale would be how Madison repelled a foreign invasion which included the burning of the White House without suspending ANY civil rights, but that's just the silly rantings of a progressive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
18. If I show this to my mother, she'll say, "This is why 9/11 happened".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC