Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who Killed Benazir?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 06:15 PM
Original message
Who Killed Benazir?
Source: Wired

Who Killed Benazir? (Updated)
By Noah Shachtman - Dec 28, 2007

Al-Qaeda has already claimed credit for the assassination of Benzair Bhutto, Pakistan's former prime minister. But this crime has plenty of suspects -- any combination of whom might have been working together. Here's a line-up of the potential killers...

* Al-Qaeda & Co. The Washington Post puts the terror group and its allies in Afghanistan and Pakistan at the "top of the list." Bin Laden and Bhutto were old foes. And the Pakistani government has certainly been quick to finger the jihadists. ''We have the evidence that al Qaeda and Taliban were behind the suicide attack on Benazir Bhutto,'' Interior Minister Hamid Nawaz told the AP. ......

Read more: http://blog.wired.com/defense/2007/12/who-killed-bena.html



http://blog.wired.com/defense/2007/12/who-killed-bena.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. "...After all it was you and me."
:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. actually AQ said they DIDN'T do it. Pakistan claimed they have
a recording of AQ claiming they did it. Not exactly the same thing.

and Pakistan said boo about who until Condi's State dept. issued a press release hinting that AQ was involved.

The way that the medical diagnosis as to cause of death changed over time, the lack of an autopsy, the muzzling of certain witnesses, the martial law, the refusal to allow independent exams of her body, and the lack of security, despite multiple requests, even directed to US State, (and ignored by Condi)

well, I suggest that it was not Musharif, but a rogue (?) element of the military. The ones who stole billions in US cash, and were afraid of being accountable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dantyrant Donating Member (278 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I agree... Musharraf's already on such thin ice
and he knows enough about tactics to have not gotten involved.

The military, OTOH, had plenty of reason to distrust Bhutto - she had proposed escalating the War on Terror in Waziristan, a cause almost universally unpopular among Pakistanis. Islamism is NOT a threat to Pakistan to the same degree that we are lead to believe here, and this is especially true in the major urban centers of Pakistan. To the extent that Islamism *does* take hold, we must suspect the complicity of the ISI, if only because we've seen from history how they've helped to nurture such movements before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. It wouldn't surprise me if Bush & co has been financing Al-Qaida for their own purposes. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC