Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton aides had hand in Dubai deal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 12:46 AM
Original message
Clinton aides had hand in Dubai deal
Edited on Sat Dec-29-07 01:56 AM by Lithos
Newsday.com
Clinton aides had hand in Dubai deal
Clinton advisers' outside lobbying work for firm to take over defense plants accents their awkward position
BY GLENN THRUSH

Newsday Washington Bureau

September 14, 2006

WASHINGTON

In the spring, when Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton was denouncing the Dubai Ports World deal, a consulting firm run by her top advisers was quietly lobbying for a Dubai takeover of two U.S. defense plants, Newsday has learned.

The Glover Park Group, whose principals include Clinton insiders Howard Wolfson, Joe Lockhart and Gigi Georges, was paid about $100,000 to help the government-owned Dubai International Capital Corp. in its acquisition of the British engineering firm Doncasters Group Ltd.

The four-month lobbying effort apparently didn't include any contact with Clinton's office. "They didn't have contact with us on either" of the Dubai deals, said Clinton spokesman Philippe Reines.

But it underscores the awkwardness of Clinton's political kitchen cabinet being housed inside a firm that features one of Washington's most aggressive and fast-growing lobbying operations.

Edited to 3-4 paragraphs to conform to DU's policy concerning fair use of copyrighted material.
Lithos
DU Moderator


Copyright © 2007, Newsday Inc.

http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/nation/ny-usclin144890633sep14,0,4573985,print.story?coll=ny-nationalnews-print
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. S.O.B.'s have started haven't they I knew it wouldn't
take long before the swiftboating started. And it is going to get worst. Just think...if Hillary Clinton was that important, to get bush and the republican congress to do something and she wasn't even PRESIDENT, wonder what she can get done as a president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. So Clinton opposed the deal
even though some advisors worked to pass it? Sounds like she's mighty independent!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. And I have a bridge in Brooklyn that I'm sure she'll sell you...but
you'll have to contact her lobbyist buddies...

My god. Lemmings... dare I say the word "sheep".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. doesn't the article say she opposed the deal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. read the entire article, grasp it...
The activities documented reek of corruption and underhanded behind the scenes maneuvers.

I know you want see that though... The glow from Clinton's halo is blinding you.. I understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I did read it
Edited on Sat Dec-29-07 01:57 AM by MonkeyFunk
it said Clinton opposed the dubai ports deal. I'm not sure why the article is linking the ports deal to the Doncaster deal, which was a totally different thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. No
She opposed the Dubai Ports World deal in favor of people connected to Wolfson et al and other Clinton friends. I wondered at the time why there was no uproar after the initial Dubai deal was booed down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 01:57 AM
Response to Original message
8. Now we know why she loves lobbyists
She's part of the problem. No doubt about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 03:17 AM
Response to Original message
9. Revolving door...
Edited on Sat Dec-29-07 03:19 AM by autorank
Remember Rep. Tauzin (Whatever-LA) leaving Congress and heading up big pharma's lobbying arm after greasing the skids for some of their key legislation. These aids are all too typical of the transient loyalty to cause we experience in our party. Once the big bucks are put on display in the corridors of power, the greedy get going. A few key Kerry aids did the same thing after the campaign.

It's instructive to note that we never hear about a Republican staffer leaving some right winger and working for the ACLU or the AFL-CIO. Why? Because The Money Party, big business and mega personal wealth, is the only place to go and they're invariably Republican. So these folks who got their start with the Democrats trot off and betray what they were fighting for and whore for the right wing.

It's not relevant in terms of Clinton's candidacy. She didn't ask them to do this. It's all about greed and hypocrisies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Clinton WH Had Ended System of Checking Foreign Guests (NYT '97):
White House Had Ended System of Checking Foreign Guests

By TIM WEINER
Published: February 3, 1997

Ten years ago the Reagan White House adopted a rule about foreign businessmen, lobbyists and consultants who wanted to get in to see the President without the blessing of their embassies: they shouldn't.

But President Clinton's aides did not follow that rule. In their eagerness to raise campaign money, they invited friends of the President's fund-raisers -- including China's biggest arms merchant, favor-seeking Indonesian businessmen, a reputed Russian mobster and other dubiously credentialed dealmakers -- to meet with Mr. Clinton. Nor did the White House check the suitability of Americans invited by the Democratic National Committee to meet the President, allowing, among others, a twice-convicted felon to sip coffee with Mr. Clinton.

-snip

And that is why nobody on the White House political team saw fit to ask the National Security Council staff a year ago about a man named Wang Jun, who showed up on a guest list for a White House coffee with the President. The question of exactly how Mr. Wang got into the White House has a simple answer: ''Nobody ever asked anybody,'' a National Security Council official said.

So, at the behest of a tireless political fund-raiser from Arkansas, Charlie Yah Lin Trie, Mr. Clinton wound up sipping coffee with Mr. Wang, who runs the Chinese Government's weapons manufacturing and procuring agency, which is involved in secret arms deals around the world. These coffees for fund-raisers and donors began as a way to raise morale among party loyalists after the Democrats' disastrous showing in the 1994 election. By 1995, they became a way to reward big donors and prospect for new ones, according to Democratic fund-raisers.

-snip

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C01E2DC103DF930A35751C0A961958260&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all


A federal grand jury has indicted 14 people and a Georgia company in a scheme to smuggle several million dollars worth of automatic weapons into the United States from China. The indictment came after federal agents smashed an arms smuggling ring that they said involved two government-run Chinese munitions firms. The following press release and affidavit outline the building of the government's case.

U.S. Department of Justice

United States Attorney
Northern District of California

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

MAY 23, 1996

MASSIVE SEIZURE OF NEW AUTOMATIC WEAPONS
ILLEGALLY SMUGGLED BY PRC WEAPONS PRODUCERS

SAN FRANCISCO - Michael J. Yamaguchi, United States Attorney
for the Northern District of California; Rollin B. Klink, Special
Agent in Charge, United States Customs Service, San Francisco; and
Paul Snabel, Special Agent in Charge, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
and Firearms, announced today the largest seizure of fully
operational automatic weapons in the history of U. S. law
enforcement. The weapons were illegally smuggled into the United
States from the People's Republic of China (PRC) during the course
of a federal investigation of an alleged arms trafficking conspiracy
involving Chinese nationals, Chinese resident aliens, and U. S.
citizens, a number of whom represented PRC owned and controlled
munitions manufacturing facilities. The illegal importation of the
weapons into the United States is in violation of the Presidential
Embargo on the importation of weapons and munitions designated on
the United States Munitions List, and U. S. law regarding the
importation, possession, and sale of illegal weapons.

On March 18, 1996, agents of the United States Customs Service
and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms seized 2000 AK-47
type fully automatic 7.62mm machine guns. These are military
assault weapons commonly used by the military around the world.
The weapons, which had both Chinese (Norinco) and Korean
markings, had been smuggled into the United States in a container on
board the COSCO ship, Empress Phoenix. Included with the
weapons were approximately 4000 30-40 round ammunition
magazines. It is estimated that the weapons had a street value of more
than four million dollars.

The seizure of the weapons was the culmination of a sixteen month
investigation of high ranking officials, based in both the United
States and the PRC, of POLYTECH and NORINCO, PRC
controlled munitions manufacturing corporations. Hammond KU,
age 49, a Taiwanese resident alien, residing in Soquel, California,
first came under suspicion when information was developed that he
had several thousand Chinese manufactured weapons, in crate.
labelled POLYTECH and NORINCO, stored in his warehouse in
Soquel, California. KU paid federal agent-, acting in an undercover
capacity, to illegally import into the United States, more than 20,000
AK 47 rifle bipods.

-snip
http://www.courttv.com/archive/legaldocs/misc/smuggle.html


New York Times, May 17, 1998



How Chinese Won Rights to Launch Satellites for U.S.

(BY JEFF GERTH AND DAVID E. SANGER)
On Oct. 9, 1995, Secretary of State Warren Christopher ended a lengthy debate within the Clinton Administration by initialing a classified order that preserved the State Department's sharp limits on China's ability to launch American-made satellites aboard Chinese rockets.

Both American industry and state-owned Chinese companies had been lobbying for years to get the satellites off what is known as the `munitions list,' the inventory of America's most sensitive military and intelligence-gathering technology. But Mr. Christopher sided with the Defense Department, the intelligence agencies and some of his own advisers, who noted that commercial satellites held technological secrets that could jeopardize `significant military and intelligence interests.'

There was one more reason not to ease the controls, they wrote in a classified memorandum. Doing so would `raise suspicions that we are trying to evade China sanctions' imposed when the country was caught shipping weapons technology abroad--which is what happened in 1991 and 1993 for missile sales to Pakistan.

-snip

Other powerful Chinese state enterprises also had multibillion-dollar stakes in getting access to American satellites. Among them was the China International Trade and Investment Corporation, whose chairman, Wang Jun, gained unwanted attention in the United States last year when it was revealed that he attended one of Mr. Clinton's campaign coffee meetings in the White House. The day of Mr. Wang's visit, Mr. Clinton, in what Mr. Rubin said was a coincidence, signed waivers allowing the Chinese to launch four American satellites--though they were unrelated to the business interests of China International Trade.

-snip

http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/china/1998/h980618-prc5.htm

AUTO,

DID YOU CATCH THAT LITTLE TIDBIT IN THE SECOND TO LAST PARAGRAPH: THEY WERE TRYING TO EVADE CHINA SANCTIONS IMPOSED WHEN CHINA WAS CAUGHT SHIPPING WEAPONS ABROAD-WHICH HAPPENED IN '91 AND '93 FOR MISSILE SALES TO*****PAKISTAN*****. Guess this old stuff that happened in the past is still relevant today!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. ...and how hard would it be to end nall of thie?

You simply separate politics from money.... government funded campaigns, no gifts in any way, shape and form from anyone, period.

It's a national emergency that requires a bipartisan solution for a bipartisan problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dreamnightwind Donating Member (863 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 04:52 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Yes!
autorank, you nailed it. So many of these scandals that we worry about could be dealt with at the source, rather than fretting about each of them individually, by 100% public campaign financing. All other issues pale in comparison. It's the reform that enables all other reforms. Thanks for focusing on the root problem and its solution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
10. Sounds like a similar crowd that Giuliani hangs around with lobbying
for special interests and in Giuliani's case it touches the criminal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 05:27 AM
Response to Original message
14. Ka-ching...Hillary, agent of change.
Now we know what kind of change we're talking about. Why people would even want another administration which operates in this manner is beyond me. Four more years of cronyism and a rehash of the 90s spun to fit the new century. Agent of change, indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 05:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC