Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Press Briefing by Tony Snow Q & A re: Walter Reed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 03:21 PM
Original message
Press Briefing by Tony Snow Q & A re: Walter Reed
Edited on Tue Feb-20-07 03:27 PM by Solly Mack
Snow can't seem to make up his mind when Bush knew about the conditions at Walter Reed - but note the answer with the asterisk and the footnote added after the press briefing.


Press Briefing by Tony Snow





Q The administration's mantra for a long time has been "support the troops." What is the reaction, then, when you read this series of stories in The Washington Post about troops coming home from Iraq, Afghanistan and being treated so poorly, apparently, based on this long investigation? What's the President's reaction?

MR. SNOW: There are a couple of things. First, it's not a mantra. I would really choose words carefully. It's a commitment to support the troops. And the President, as you know, has visited the wounded many times at Walter Reed and we are concerned about it. And the people who --

Q Were you aware?

MR. SNOW: We are aware now, yes. And I would refer you to the Department of Defense, which I know is taking a very close look at it, too.


Look, the men and women who have gone and fought for our country over there, they deserve the best care.

Q So why has that not been guaranteed, then?

MR. SNOW: I'm not sure that -- you know, when you find a problem, you deal with it.

Q So you're saying the President learned about this from The Washington Post?

MR. SNOW: I don't know exactly where he learned it, but I can tell you that we believe that they deserve better. And, again, Ed, this is something where I'd suggest you give DoD a call, because I know they've taken a good, hard look at it.


Q Tony, can I follow on that? As Bob Dole might ask, where's the outrage?

MR. SNOW: There's plenty of outrage.

Q Is there?

MR. SNOW: Yes.

Q So the President responded how when he learned about this? What, specifically -- did he order something to be done?

MR. SNOW: What I'm suggesting -- there's a reason I'm suggesting -- DoD is the proper place in which we'll be taking care of these issues. And I would refer you to them for comment. But this is something that's going to have to be an action item.

Q But is there any evidence that it was even looked at before the paper printed its two stories?

MR. SNOW: Yes.


Q Then tell us about that evidence.

MR. SNOW: That's why -- again, I would refer you, Bill, to the Department of the Army, which runs the Walter Reed Army Medical Center. This is the place where if you want to get --

Q That's just an easy way for you not to have to talk about it.

MR. SNOW: Well, it's also a way of pointing to the proper authorities, which is what you would want.

Q The White House doesn't want to be on record with a more emphatic expression of amazement and upset about this?

MR. SNOW: No. David asked where the outrage -- of course there's outrage that men and women who have been fighting have not received the outpatient care -- if you read the stories, there are many who are happy with it, some who are unhappy, and it's important that we show our commitment to the people who have served. I don't know what more you want me to do.

Q In December NPR ran a series looking at the quality of mental health care for Iraq veterans who have returned, showing that it's shocking how little care is provided to them. And several congresspeople -- Obama, Boxer and Bond -- sent a letter to the Pentagon, which you're referring us to, asking for an investigation, which they have not agreed to conduct. So you're referring us to the DoD, but they're not acting quickly on this. So does the President want them to act quickly?

MR. SNOW: Well, again, you've asked me about two separate stories.


Q It seems there's a problem that's endemic to the system.

MR. SNOW: Well, rather than leaping to a conclusion, as I said, I would suggest you call them, and then we can talk about it later.

Q Off camera this morning you said that you would have something at noon; you said, I'll talk about it then. And now you're not really --

MR. SNOW: Well, that's because -- again, I think that you may see some activity on it. And at this point I would refer you to the Department of Defense.

Q Is the system working?

MR. SNOW: Well, I'll tell you what -- is the system working? Yes. Is it working perfectly? No.

Q It's good enough?

MR. SNOW: No, I said, it's not good enough. I just told you it's not working perfectly. But there are also thousands of people who have been through the system who have been cared for. But it is important that we maintain a commitment to following up or providing the treatment that these men and women deserve.

Q Do you think the President is going to say something about this later?

MR. SNOW: No.


Q You responded to me a moment ago that the administration was aware of this before the articles appeared in the paper.

MR. SNOW: That is my understanding. But, again, this is something that's an action item over at the Department of Defense and, in particular, the Department of the Army. I am not fully briefed on the activities or who knew what, when. And I suggest --


Q Was the President aware of it? Was the White House aware of it?

MR. SNOW: I am not certain --


Q May I follow on --

Q What is the President's --

MR. SNOW: -- when we first became aware of it.*(note the asterisk) Now the President certainly has been aware of the conditions in the wards where he has visited, and visited regularly, and we also have people from Walter Reed regularly over to the White House as guests, sometimes in fairly large numbers. So as I said, the President is committed -- committed to these people, committed to men and women who have served. We need to make sure that whatever problems there are get fixed. I couldn't be any stronger or plainer about it.

Q Has he given any new orders?

MR. SNOW: No. At this point, Helen, I think the most important thing -- the way this would work is the Department of Army has its own investigation about what's going on at Walter Reed. They will be taking action. The President certainly wants to make sure that, as I said before, whatever problems there are get fixed.


Q On Walter Reed, a lot of the veterans, the medical community, the doctors, the neighbors who have worked at Walter Reed are very upset about this move, pending move to Bethesda. In light of everything that's happening, does the administration still support uprooting --

MR. SNOW: The Department of Defense has made the decision to consolidate the treatment facilities at the Bethesda Naval Medical Center.

Q Is there any chance of a second look? Some of the facilities at Walter Reed are brand new.

MR. SNOW: Well, again, I'm just going to refer you to that. This is -- all of a sudden people are trying to open up different avenues of inquiry. The fact is that those changes have, in fact, been decided upon by the Department of Defense. I am not aware of any decisions to change.

Q To clarify, were these -- any actions that the Pentagon has taken, these action items, were they done on its own, or did they do this in response to some order from here?

MR. SNOW: Again, I'm not aware that anybody has -- look, when you have a problem like this, the imperative is to fix it. I'm not sure that you have to issue orders; there are people there who know if they've got a problem they need to fix it. So I don't think that -- I will try to find out for you, but I'm not aware that the President has cut any special orders. But I will try to get for you additional information.

Q I think what we're --

MR. SNOW: I know what you're trying to do, you're trying to get a tick-tock on what did he learn and how did he respond and who did he call.

Q Yes, we're trying to determine if someone here built a fire under someone over there to do something.

MR. SNOW: You know, that's assuming that people there are callous about the fate of the people who are serving.

Q It isn't --

MR. SNOW: No, I think it is. When you say "light a fire," it's as if, you know, you find out that there's a problem and you don't move quickly to try to correct it. My sense is that there's plenty of fire for trying to get it right. But this is why I'm telling you if you want a more direct answer about this, you do need to talk to the people at the Department of the Army --

Q But, Tony, when you read --

MR. SNOW: -- who are at the ground level involvement here.

Q -- an account that says a commanding general, quotes a commanding general as saying, well, gee, we ordered repairs done, but they weren't done -- you'd think they would have known this hadn't been accomplished.

MR. SNOW: Well, again, that's why -- you've just made my point, which is you need to get back to them, and I will also get back for you with a tick-tock about what's going on at this end.

Q It's not just -- you're describing kind of a cold, detached bureaucratic process. We all know how this works. Something like this, this kind of story gets people's attention. You are now --

MR. SNOW: Well --

Q Wait a minute. You're now in the PR business, you know if something like this happens it's at odds with the commitments you make; the Commander-in-Chief might well stand up at a meeting and say, darn it, let's get to the bottom of this now and let's get answers. And this happened over the weekend, and you're saying you think the White House knew, but you're not sure; you're not sure when the President knew or if he said something to somebody. It just seems like you should have those answers.

MR. SNOW: Okay, but you also -- fine, I'll try to get them for you. But when you talk about cold detachment, I don't think saying that if it needs --

Q You're calling it an "action item"?

MR. SNOW: Well, yes, because what I'm telling you is that it is something that falls under the providence of the Department of the Army. Therefore, if you want the detailed answers about who knew what, when and how it's been handled, you do need to ask them, because they're going to have the information, David.

I can tell you that the President feels passionately about them, and you should have no doubt about it -- you've been at enough events where when he looks these people in the eye there is a commitment, a strong, profound emotional commitment to the people who serve this country. And it is one where the President is committed to doing right by the men and women who serve. There should be no doubt about that.

Q But, Tony --

MR. SNOW: Wait, wait. In that case, what I'm telling you is let's sort through the facts. I know that what you want is for me to tell you more than I know right now. So you keep at it --

Q But it would not be unreasonable for you or the President, through you, to express some kind of outrage over what has happened up there.

MR. SNOW: Well, it's also a matter of trying to figure out precisely what has happened. You have news stories, it is important to investigate. As you know, the most important thing is to fix a problem, correct? And there is absolute determination to fix the problem. The President is somebody, again, whose passion for these forces should never, ever be a topic of doubt on the part of the forces or the American people.

Q Right, but Tony, when you say he looks in the eyes of the families -- but what if the bureaucrats on the ground are not actually following through on the commitment you say he has? Doesn't he have a duty to follow through and say, what --

MR. SNOW: That's why I'm asking you to direct your questions to the people who are in direct line of responsibility for this, who are going to have more information on this than I do right now.

Q What is your reaction of Major General Weightman, who is the Commander at Walter Reed, also says in the bottom of the article on Sunday in The Washington Post, said that he's concerned and that they're bracing for, "potentially a lot more casualties," people coming to Walter Reed because of the surge. Does that cause the White House to think at all about that policy, because you have the Commander of Walter Reed --

MR. SNOW: There are a whole series of things, and, again, this is why you need to talk to people who are in the chain, because --

Q But this he said on the record.

MR. SNOW: I understand, Ed. But there are a series of things. First, for Walter Reed, what you end up having is treatment of people who are wounded -- and also this is Bethesda, as you know, different sorts of injuries are treated at the two facilities. And many of those people are there for months. And this story deals with outpatient care after that treatment, right? So it's important, I think, to understand that you've got to be prepared for all things that are going to come your way, including getting the piece right when it comes to outpatient care, and continuing also to do well by inpatients.

But, again, I know you want me to -- I'm simply not going to go beyond what I know. And in this particular case, the people who do know the facts and do know what's going on, and do know how the investigations are proceeding are the guys over at DoD.

Q I think that's part of the question. It doesn't seem like -- beyond what you know, it doesn't seem like you're asking that many questions to find out. I mean, you have a limited knowledge about the situation.

MR. SNOW: It's because they're working the issue, and I'm telling you, those are the people to talk to, the DoD.

Q -- I mean, you keep putting me off on other people --

MR. SNOW: I know.

Q This is a commitment the President has made, you said, to the families, right?

MR. SNOW: Yes.

Q So why isn't the President, why isn't his staff saying, let's get to the bottom of it now?

MR. SNOW: We are trying to get to the bottom of it, and the people who are responsible for getting to the bottom of it work on the other side of the river.


Q But, again, you put it back on the Pentagon, you're not keeping --

MR. SNOW: Yes. The members of the Pentagon, of course, Cabinet agencies and people in the administration, do answer to the President. And I've said, what's wrong needs to be fixed. Now the people that are going to do the fixing are over there. So you might want to talk to them.




END 12:42 P.M. EST

* The President first learned of the troubling allegations regarding Walter Reed from the stories this weekend in the Washington Post. He is deeply concerned and wants any problems identified and fixed.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Hell, they are ONLY soldiers." - Tony Snow
Edited on Tue Feb-20-07 03:34 PM by SpiralHawk
"I mean, get over it. It's not like they
were major republicon chickenhawk crony donors, or
anyone we could relate to.

"By the way, could you corporate media clowns in the front row
move back a couple of feet, your aura is smudging my Gucci loafers."

- Tony Snow
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. That would have been the honest answer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. KO mentioned the footnote tonight on his show
Edited on Tue Feb-20-07 08:45 PM by Solly Mack
Snow continuously waffled on when Bush knew. First stating Bush was aware "now", implying after the WP article and then going on to say they had evidence of the conditions at Walter Reed "before" the article and going on to say Bush was certainly aware of the conditions in the wards he visited...only to add the footnote AFTER the press briefing was over.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 02:04 AM
Response to Original message
4. In other words, according to Snow, bush doesn't give a sh#t!
And, according to Snow this is the DOD and Army's problem.

Been wondering lately what Bush does bother his beautiful mind with?

Best I can tell is for bush to gather adoring, pre-paid admirers to cheer and scream at his mere presence is considered critical. He needs this kind of scene to keep those sheep in line. Those sheep love a Great Leader! SARCASM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Pretty much. Bush won't be commenting...the so-called CinC
the man who claims he cares and supports the troops...won't be commenting..or issueing orders to get the problems corrected
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 03:57 AM
Response to Original message
5. just some dissatified customers?
MR. SNOW: No. David asked where the outrage -- of course there's outrage that men and women who have been fighting have not received the outpatient care -- if you read the stories, there are many who are happy with it, some who are unhappy, and it's important that we show our commitment to the people who have served. I don't know what more you want me to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Exactly! Amazing isn't it? It's not the rats, the walls covered in mold
or the overall neglect...it's just unhappy customers.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. because they are intimidated about speaking out
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=252344&mesg_id=252344


GI Denied Health Care After Speaking Out
By Mark Benjamin
United Press International

Tuesday 02 March 2004

Congress, veterans groups, and the press should immediately launch a full investigation into this Operation Iraqi Freedom veteran's allegation he suffered retaliation from the military for speaking with reporters about substandard military healthcare. A series of three UPI articles about this major scandal are posted here. They describe the "squalor" more than 1,000 wounded, ill, or injured service members were forced to endure while on "medical hold." -- Veterans for Common Sense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
symbolman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 04:18 AM
Response to Original message
6. Excuse me
But do they NOT CLAIM that BUSH is the Commander in Chief?

IS the CIC NOT IN CONTROL OF THE DOD? OR the Pentagon?

Total Horseshit. And here's what bothers me, with the questioners. WHAT a PERFECT time to land a KNOCKOUT PUNCH with a single Question.

"Mr SNOWJOB, isn't is TRUE that Bush has REDUCED the Monies Neccessary to CARE FOR VETERANS in this Submitted Budget and in Preceeding Years?"

BANG!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. They should have mentioned the funding cuts and the VA hospital closings
Bush being the CinC is the equivalent of giving a child a toy badge and a cowboy hat and telling them to go play sheriff...you get a little tyrant telling everyone what to do without any idea of real responsibility
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. here are a few examples of Republicans supporting the troops
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Great list!!! Thank you!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
13. Here is the line he uttered that puts the lie to all the rest
"And the President, as you know, has visited the wounded many times at Walter Reed and we are concerned about it."
If the pResident had visited many times, he surely would have raised a ruckus because it was not that hard to identify the problems. Since apparently he did not bother to raise any concerns until it was publicized in a major news outlet, he did not really care... There really is no way around it on this issue. Bush* is an out and out LIAR....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Precisely!
Bush was in and out for the photo-op

and you just know the recipients were carefully chosen for the photo-op

Bush didn't "see" because Bush wasn't "looking"

He doesn't care

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. they get the Katrina talk and lack of caring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
14. K & R
Excellent find Solly Mack!!!

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Thanks, wicket!
Love the footnote...as if that explains away all the other changing lies during the briefing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #18
28. I can almost hear Gilda Radner now:
"Nevermind."

:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
16. Gen. Weightman (4 star) was on CNN this morning.
He hadn't personally been to Building 18 or the other unit (can't remember name) that's in as bad shape.
He'd had "reports" from subordinates that evidently hadn't indicated how bad conditions were there.

What ever happened to no-notice walk-through inspections by the CO?
A good commander never just accepts 'reports' at face value.
He makes damned sure by personal inspections.
I think he'll get some serious flack over what's happened on his watch, and so he should.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Exactly! Whenever a new CO takes over an assignment, you do a walk through
because you literally sign over the people under your charge...the people are part of the inventory and on the inventory list. So you check everything to CYA, least you get stuck with blame for whatever the last CO did - if for no other reason. You check your equipment, you check your personnel.

He deserves whatever flack he gets.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
20. Is "cliche" Tony Snow's middle name?
tick-tock :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. I believe it is
lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
21. What the Hell kind of Leadershipdoes Bush have??? Is it LOSERSHIP?
Lame and weak answers Tony....Lame
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. The obvious lies and changing of answers...and then adding the footnote
afterwards...truly lame.

They act as if no one notices their actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #24
32. Our Political Adversaries ...are they THAT DUMB?? That Stupid???
Sure looks like it.....

They....(GOP included) need REHAB from IGNORANCE real bad...Amazing....(shakes head in disbelief)

All BS/Spin...no Substance.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
In Truth We Trust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
22. Why would Bush** want to bother his "beautiful mind". Lousy pos fraWd!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. and didn't you just love the answer about Bush making a statement
regarding WR?

NO...

Bush enjoys calling himself the decider and the CinC but suddenly, the CinC has got nothing to say about the neglect of the troops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
26. The plan has been to replace Walter Reed w/another facility
but what vets over in Europe wonder about is, how can you close WR in the middle of two wars, maybe three?

Bush is in a corner in so many ways on this issue. Ultimately, I don't think he comprehends how many injured soldiers have resulted from his own incompetence. It's like he's the second coming of Don Quixote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. I know - cut funding/benefits & close hospitals all in the middle of 2 wars
And we're supposed to trust this man?



Even if they weren't up to speed in 2002 or 2003...it's 2007. There is no excuse. Though I'm sure they'll come up with one that satisfies them...even if it doesn't anyone else

usually, once on the chopping block, the funding also starts to get smaller...I can't help but think the same happened at Reed...why bother refurbishing what you are getting rid of anyway? Except for the obvious,that is...it's still being used and is still needed.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #27
33. I've been told by a higher up that there have been cuts in FY 2007 budget
to all non-defense related programs, actually, "reallocations," and that money is, of course, staying within the DoD, but being shifted to defense. Bush is going to pour all his resources into Iran, imo.

Did you see Cheney aboard the Kitty Hawk, shaking everyone's hands? The real DinC meets with the sailors just before battle.

http://www.stripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=43770

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
29. like Katrina, they will address the 'problem' with PR rhetoric
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OxQQme Donating Member (694 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. I'll tick tock that and get back to you...............
kicking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
31. this flipflop
is a prime example of the fact that facts - truth - mean NOTHING to these people.

something happens, and they say "let's see, what words should we put together to enhance our image and further our agenda? Then they write them all down on note cards and go forth to recite them. how those words realte to actual facts is never even considered

This is a case where they barged ahead with "of course he knew" to try to make themselves look all-knowing, and forgot the fact it would make them look incredibly incompetant and insensitive

so they said "oops" and changed it to "he didn't know" - and guess what? it makes them look incredibly incompetant and insensitive anyway.

it does not occur to them to say "we f**ed up; heads will roll, this will never happen again to our brave heros" because, back to principle #1, that might not enhance their image, since they have decided the image should be infallibility.

chimpy's oft-repeated smirking line w/respect to Iran and weapons should be thrown in his smirking face. "which is worse? that he knew and did nothing, or that he didn't know?"

to quote an old song, "nothing from nothing leaves nothing" - and that is this crowd's credibility.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC