Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush is not the only problem- We need a NEW CONGRESS!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Peace Candidate Donating Member (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 02:31 PM
Original message
Bush is not the only problem- We need a NEW CONGRESS!!
Even if Kucinich could miraculously win the presidency- He's going to need a new Congress to work with!

This is old but still worth reading...
http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?ItemID=9648
Who will be the peace candidate in 2008? In a desperate era, that is the question on many lips. The answer flows from another question: Are anti-war Americans ready to support a peace candidate? In 2004, most did not. Prominent progressives pledged support to a candidate who did not represent them. Now, that choice seems to have left a bad taste.



This week, Molly Ivins declared she'd had enough, warning that she, "will not support Hillary Clinton for president." Arianna Huffington asked, rhetorically and in all caps, "What The Hell Are They Thinking?" And in November, The Nation pledged that it would, "not support any candidate for national office who does not make a speedy end to the war in Iraq a major issue of his or her campaign."



These statements are understandable. The Democratic leadership has been nothing if not consistent. They abandoned their voters a month after the 2000 elections; they held out for just six hours in 2004. They voted for the "PATRIOT Act." They voted for the invasion of Iraq. They voted for John Roberts. They voted additional funds for the occupation of Iraq, and against an immediate withdrawal. They knew of Bush's wiretapping, and did nothing. They have undercut efforts to filibuster Alito. And they have stalled the drive for impeachment.



Millions of American progressives knew better, know better. A few dozen members of Congress knew better, know better. And what's worse, recent developments within the Democratic Party all but guarantee that it will not back anti-war candidates in 2006 or 2008.

---------

What are the brave and intelligent people of DU going to do about this?

How about running for Congress!!

Watch this video of Katherine Harris and Ted Stevens and KNOW that YOU ARE Qualified to Run For Congress!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98_b5JW2CII#GU5U2spHI_4

then check this site to find the dates and information for becoming a candidate
www.peacecandidates.com

What a great way to shock the relatives at Christmas- Tell them you are running for Congress!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. You just don't get it. If Congress tried to act the way you want, the media would destroy them.
Edited on Mon Dec-24-07 02:36 PM by Perry Logan
Trying to replace the Democrats with better models will not solve the problem, so it would be largely a waste of time--even if you could do it.

Keep in mind the right-controlled media can still lead most Americans around by the nose. If the Dems went too progressive, they'd be annihilated.

It has little to do with courage. Even Audy Murphy wouldn't have stepped in front of a speeding train.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durtee librul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Oh, so THAT excuses their crappy records -
they are doing it because it's what the press expects? Spare me. Unless I missed the sarcasm in your post.

In any event, Merry Christmas to all DU'ers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. But their record is NOT crappy. Once again, the media has deceived you. Just take a look...
Edited on Mon Dec-24-07 02:38 PM by Perry Logan
"President Bush's success rating in the Democratic-controlled House has fallen this year to a half-century low, and he prevailed on only 14 percent of the 76 roll call votes on which he took a clear position.

"So far this year, Democrats have backed the majority position of their caucus 91 percent of the time on average on such votes. That marks the highest Democratic unity score in 51 years."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=1728952&mesg_id=1728952
http://public.cq.com/docs/cqt/news110-000002576765.html

Don't let the media rhetoric fool you. The Democrats have acquitted themselves quite well--especially given their bare majority in both houses, and a relentlessly obstructionist Republican minority.

this 110th Congress has had more roll call votes this year than any other Congress in history, almost doubling the number under the previous Congress overseen by Boehner and House Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-IL):
The House last week held its 943rd roll call vote of the year, breaking the previous record of 942 votes, a mark set in 1978. The vote was on a procedural motion related to a mortgage foreclosure bill. When the House adjourned on Oct. 4 for the long weekend, the chamber had reached 948 roll call votes, putting Democrats on pace to easily eclipse 1,000 votes on the House floor in 2007.
Last year, the Republican controlled House held 543 votes, and for historical comparison, the last time there was a shift in power in Congress, Republicans held 885 roll call votes in 1995. The Senate, which has held 363 votes this year, isn't on pace to break any records, but has already surpassed the 2006 Senate mark of 279 votes.
Much of the lack of progress can be traced back to obstructionism by conservatives.
Approximately "1 in 6 roll-call votes in the Senate this year have been cloture votes," noted a JulyMcClatchy report. "If this pace of blocking legislation continues, this 110th Congress will be on track to roughly triple the previous record number of cloture votes."
It's interesting that Boehner is criticizing the 110th Congress as doing nothing. After all, the House, under his leadership, met for just 101 days during the second session of the 109th Congress, setting the record "for the fewest days in session in one year since the end ofWorld War II."

There are countless investigations going on. Healthcare is on the table. The internet is safe for now. Our wounded vets are no longer lying around in their own urine. The Senate Ethics Committee is back in action. Many 9/11 Commission recommendations are being passed. A bill to increase financial aid for colleges has passed--the single largest increase in college aid since the GI bill. The President's signing statements are being investigated. Legislation to restore habeus corpus has been approved. The Senate Armed Services Committee has passed legislation "that would grant new rights to terror suspects held at Guantanamo Bay. The unions have a voice in the government now—as do gays, women, and minorities. The environment has a fighting chance. The House passed the Taxpayer Protection Act, to protect taxpayers against "identity theft, deceptive Web sites and loan sharks." It also makes it "easier for taxpayers to retrieve property lost as a result of a wrongful Internal Revenue Service levy and directs the IRS to notify lower-income people that they qualify for the Earned Income Tax Credit." The House approved a bill spending $1.7 billion over five years for cleaner water. There's a new House committee devoted solely to addressing the issue of global warming. And so on.

Less than six months into the 110th Congress, Senate Democrats have made significant strides in passing important, common-sense legislation that reflect the priorities of the American people. After nearly a decade of Republican control, Democrats have worked to restore fiscal responsibility in Washington and pass key legislation on Iraq policy, homeland security, troop readiness, veterans' health care, economic competitiveness, ethics reform, the minimum wage, health care, education, energy independence, stem cell research, and Gulf Coast revitalization. Democrats are committed to proving that elections do matter, and we will continue to pursue the international and domestic priorities that matter most to the American people. Together, we will take the country in a new direction.

Under Democratic leadership, the Senate has passed the following measures:

* A fiscally responsible budget: a budget that restores fiscal discipline and will lead to a surplus, while cutting middle-class taxes and funding foreign anddomestic priorities, including education, children's health care, veterans, and our troops;

* 9/11 Commission recommendations: a bill to make America more secure by giving our first responders the tools they need to keep us safe; making it more difficult for potential terrorists to travel into our country; advancing efforts to secure our rail, air, and mass transit systems; and improving intelligence and information sharing between state, local, and federal law enforcement agencies;

* Homeland security funding: legislation that provides $1.05 billion in funding necessary to address dangerous border and transit vulnerabilities left open by the Bush Administration since 9/11;

* Support for our troops: legislation funding the President's requests for Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom, including $1.2 billion in additional funding for a total of $3 billion to provide our troops in Iraq with mine-resistant, ambush-protected vehicles;

* Health care for wounded soldiers and veterans: legislation that provides $3 billion in supplemental funds for military health care and $1.8 billion in supplemental funds to the Department of Veterans' Affairs to accommodate the increasing number of new veterans returning home from Iraq and Afghanistan;

* Benchmarks for Iraq: legislation that conditions U.S. economic support for the Iraqi government on its progress toward achieving key political benchmarks;

* National Guard readiness: legislation to provide an additional $1 billion to President Bush's request for National Guard equipment needs to remedy equipment shortfalls that are compromising the quality of force training and limiting the Guard's ability to quickly respond to natural and potential man-made disasters at home;

* Continuing Resolution: legislation providing funding for the nine remaining appropriations bills that were not completed by Republicans in the 109th Congress. In passing this legislation, Democrats stayed within budget limits, eliminated earmarks, and increased funding for national priorities, including veterans' medical care, Pell grants, elementary and secondary education, the National Institutes of Health, state and local law enforcement, and global AIDS prevention and treatment;
* Energy Bill: landmark legislation to increase our energy independence, strengthen the economy, reduce global warming emissions, and protect American consumers.

* American competitiveness: bipartisan legislation to increase the nation's investment in basic and innovative research; strengthen educational opportunities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics from elementary through graduate school; and develop the infrastructure needed to enhance innovation and competitiveness in the United States;

* Ethics and lobbying reform: a bill to slow the "revolving door" for former Senators and staff, strengthen limits on gifts and travel, expand lobbying disclosure requirements, establish a study commission on ethics and lobbying, prohibit pensions for Members of Congress convicted of certain crimes, and implement reform procedures relating to earmarks and conference reports;

* Minimum wage: legislation to increase the federal minimum wage to $7.25/hour;

* Middle-class tax cuts: the 2008 Budget Resolution provides for permanent extensions of the Marriage Penalty tax relief, the $1,000 refundable Child Tax Credit; the 10 percent income tax bracket; the adoption tax credit; the dependent care tax credit; U.S. soldiers' combat pay for the earned income tax credit; and reform of the estate tax to protect small businesses and family farms;

* AMT patch: the 2008 Budget Resolution ensures that the number of taxpayers subject to the alternative minimum tax will not increase in 2007, giving Congress and the Administration time to come up with a permanent solution;

* Head Start: a bill to expand eligibility for the Head Start program;
* Stem cell research: legislation to expand the number of human embryonic stem cells eligible for federally-funded research;

* Children's health coverage: the 2008 Budget Resolution and the 2007 Emergency Supplemental provide needed funds for the Children's Health Insurance Program;

* FDA reauthorization: a bill to greatly improve the Food and Drug Administration's oversight of drug safety;

* Rebuilding the Gulf Coast: legislation providing a total of $6.4 billion for victims of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, including $1.3 billion to complete levee and drainage repairs, $50 million to reduce violent crime in Gulf Coast states, and $110 million to repair the seafood and fisheries industries, which is vital to the region's economic recovery;

* Army Corps reform: legislation to ensure that the Army Corps of Engineers does its job more effectively and soundly;

* Disaster assistance for small businesses: legislation providing recovery assistance for small businesses impacted by the 2005 hurricanes in an effort to revitalize the Gulf Coast economy;

* U.S. Attorney appointments: legislation ending the indefinite appointment of interim U.S. Attorneys and restoring the role of the Senate in the selection of U.S. Attorneys;

* Tax relief for small businesses: legislation providing a range of deficit-neutral tax incentives designed to help small businesses grow;

* Education and training: the 2008 Budget Resolution provides for the largest increase since 2002 in funding for elementary and secondary programs; and

* Energy and environment programs: legislation increasing funding for basic science research at the Department of Energy and for energy efficiency and renewable energy programs.
http://www.apostille.us/news/democratic_accomplishments_in_the_110th_congress_leading_america_in_a_new_direction.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Candidate Donating Member (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. You are really defending the Congressional record
They said they were too busy to defend the Constitution via Impeachment, but every day they pass some stupid ass legislation honoring the boy scouts, creating national honor your cat month...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Candidate Donating Member (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. The corporate media has lost all credibility.
Only the backwash even believes them anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Work4Peace Donating Member (20 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. I agree
They lose their power when we ignore them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. The Congress can destroy the corporate media any time it gets up the guts to.
The state propaganda organs exist in their present form by consent of the Congress, which controls the airways and which ALLOWED the sort of media consolidation that they now claim to be afraid of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. Fear Based Decision Making Will Solve Nothing
The media will always be there, but shouldn't be used as an excuse to do nothing. If anything, it looks cowardly and worse in the end. It what is being used as a cop-out in this thread. We get it, and we aren't afraid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lateo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. You can't run around being afraid...
and not acting according to your conscience. That is no way to go through life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. We need a new electoral system.
As long as the corporate elite choose the candidates we are mere bystanders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. Lets throw em all out, and replace them with different politicians! yeah! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Candidate Donating Member (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. replace them with real people who don't even want the job
That is the point- we do not want career politicians. We need every day Americans, real people, people who don't even want the job to run because they feel an obligation to save our nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Won't work
its the job and its demands, not the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Candidate Donating Member (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. They make 160,000 per year, work less than 100 days per year
Staffers do most of the work, most Congressmen don't even bother to make floor speeches or anything...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. So what district are you running in?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. OK, that's fine for you...
...but what about the rest of us, who live in reality?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Work4Peace Donating Member (20 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. why is it unrealistic?
Americans are ready for a new Congress, what is the approval rating these days?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
13. A new Congress might be doable in the House anyway if
we are determined to clean out entrenched Republican seats and Republican Lite Democrats from Congress. We will have to start now grooming candidates. I feel that candidates who wants to get a congressional seat in hard wired red district should run as independents caucausing with the Democrats like Bernie Sanders of Vermont does once elected. I live in such a district and a Democrat doesn't have a chance with the predominantly rancher voters but an independent will win votes away from the idiot freeper we have now as our Congressman if s/he knows what to say to them that will resonate without compromising her/his integrity. They will not listen to a Democrat.

Districts with democratic DINOS need to vote for the other Democrat in the primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cobalt-60 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-25-07 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #13
21. It's worth a try
I don't know - or care - why these congressmen are collaborating.
They need to lose their jobs for failure to represent.
But if we can't turn them out, we'll have to support them in the General Election.
This one is absolutely critical. This is the referendum on Torture and Murder.
Every single "R" that pollutes the House is a thumbs up for torture and murder.
If we beat them down in full view of the world we can re gain a little respect.
The Republicans have earned a legendary beating. We need to give it to them.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
17. kicked and recommended
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lisainmilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-25-07 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
20. Corporate Media, Corporate Senators, Corporate????
Corporations own us period
Until the $$$$ is out of Washington. I know I sound like a parrot, I am getting sick of me, but I do believe wholeheartedly this is the problem.

http://opensecrets.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-25-07 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #20
25. Pretty clear from Opensecrets
that they don't own my reps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-25-07 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
22. I thought I smelled something and apparently the mods did too.
Hope you enjoyed your short yet transparent stay? :hi:

"Peace"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-25-07 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
23. DUers running for Congress?
Damn! Why didn't I think of that? (You're new, I'll fill you in. I do a "DUers need to run for Congress" thread about once a month. It sinks like a stone but maybe you'll have better luck.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-25-07 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
24. I don't want to replace my reps
And therein lies the problem. Yes, Congress has shitty rating, but most Americans like their own reps- they just think all the rest sucks. In my case, I think I do have something to like. Why would I want to replace Pat Leahy, Bernie Sanders and Peter Welch? I can't think of any Vermonters who would be better. Furthermore, someone just up and running, with no pertinent experience will get nowhere. Happens all the time here that someone just decides to run. They never get even close to the support needed to become part of the conversation. In politics, you don't just start out running for Congress. Start on the city or state level and create a viable pool of progressives to vote for in coming years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC