Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mukasey cuts off White House access to information on probes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 08:49 PM
Original message
Mukasey cuts off White House access to information on probes
Mukasey cuts off White House access to information on probes
By Marisa Taylor - McClatchy - Dec 19, 2007 - http://www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/23446.html


WASHINGTON — Attorney General Michael Mukasey Wednesday reversed a controversial Bush administration policy that had allowed numerous White House officials to know about ongoing federal investigations.

In a memo to Justice Department employees, Mukasey said communications about criminal and civil investigations "must be limited."

During his confirmation hearings in October, Mukasey had promised that he'd change the policy after senators said it enabled White House officials to exert improper influence on the Justice Department.

Justice Department officials now will inform the White House about investigations "only where it is important for the performance of the president's duties" and crucial "from a law enforcement perspective," Mukasey said.

The original policy authorized more than 40 Justice Department officials and 400 White House officials to know about ongoing investigations, according to Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse ..........

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks, Sheldon!
:loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. He's my favorite "Sheldon".
Recommended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. For me
it was close



But he definitely wins. :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. If only our country could elect someone despite him or her having the name
"Whitehouse".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. It's a shame.
Because the campaign slogans practically write themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. I hope this is for real; I bet the wh must be fuming! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemGa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. Interesting....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. What you said n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. woot, there it is.
nt


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. Whitehouse. What a great Senator! What did we do without him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
8. heehee
I bet that will piss off the old man and his little boy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
9. 400 WH officials knew about ongoing invesigations?
Crap, I didn't know there WERE so many.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hvn_nbr_2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yeah, they told everyone who was being investigated. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. teehee!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
11. that's a step in the right direction...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Didereaux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
13. PROOF! show me proof, not more words and memos PROOF! by actions n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Throw the dog a bone while the tail wags the dog, me thinketh first, but
it can also mean the White House is too often a target of ongoing investigations, and no other choice remains appropriate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
17. HA! and we could believe this....coming from Mukasey. The stovepipe
will just be hidden from view...but it's still there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-25-07 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Yes, now it is done without creating evidence!! Big difference that. An improvement for Bushco.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC