Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reid to again block controversial Bush holiday recess appointments

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 09:02 AM
Original message
Reid to again block controversial Bush holiday recess appointments

THIS JUST IN: Reid to again block controversial Bush holiday recess appointments
by John Aravosis (DC) · 12/19/2007 06:28:00 PM ET · Link


Democratic Senate leader Harry Reid is on the Senate floor right now announcing that he will be keeping the Senate in a pro forma session throughout the Christmas and New Years holiday in order to block Bush from making recess appointments of controversial nominees that couldn't make their way through the appropriate Senate committees. Reid will, however, (I believe) be letting a large number of non-controversial Republican nominees be confirmed. This is good. It doesn't make up for being on the verge of passing a domestic spying bill and continuing to fund the war, but appointments are very important, and anything that can be done to stop Bush from thwarting the Senate's constitutional role in confirming presidential appointees is a good thing. (Reid's statement after the jump.)

Mr. President, I turn to the issue of nominations

I have been working with the White House over the past several days in an effort to reach an agreement that works for both sides.

We were unable to reach such an agreement before the Thanksgiving holiday.

That led to my calling the Senate into pro forma sessions to avoid the President’s very objectionable recess appointments.

My hope was that I could avoid that prospect for the coming holidays. I tried to work with the President.

But he indicated he would still use the recess to appoint nominees who are completely objectionable on our side of the aisle.

Our only solution to prevent this is to call pro forma sessions again.

Mr. President, I thought, I could be a grinch.

I could tell the President that I would not move any nominations given his demand to make controversial recess appointments.

That would mean over 40 other Republican nominees would not move forward today.

A smaller number of Democratic appointments – 8 – would also not move.

But I’m not going to do that tonight, Mr. President.

I am not going to meet intransigence with intransigence.

We will confirm those appointments this evening.

And, I will keep the Senate in pro forma session to block the President from doing an end run around the Senate and the Constitution with his controversial nominees.

I, for one, hope for better in the New Year.

http://www.americablog.com/2007/12/this-just-in-reid-to-again-block.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
elizfeelinggreat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. all right
This is good news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sshan2525 Donating Member (311 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. That doesn't get him off the hook....
Edited on Thu Dec-20-07 09:06 AM by sshan2525
He's been an utter spineless failure as majority leader. Shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. He'll need to do this all next year too.
And if Junior promises he won't make recess appointments, Reid's a fool if he believes him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
4. This is good news....there is alot of damage bush could do
w/what time he has left, particularly w/recess appt's. A year is a an eternity in the political aspect, and some of these appt's could be a serious disaster, as they would never be confirmed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
5. It wouldn't surprise me if Bush issued a presidential finding that such
Edited on Thu Dec-20-07 09:14 AM by Benhurst
sessions don't count.

The Bush Crime Family has no respect for the Constitution (or what's left after a compliant Congress participated in its shredding) whatsoever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. There is nothing to stop him,
Edited on Thu Dec-20-07 09:16 AM by spotbird
it's a surprise Bush hasn't done that already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Didereaux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. They DO NOT want that one in the USSupCT...
That flies directly into the powers and definitions and is clearly spelled out. Only Thomas and Alito would rule in the WH's favor on that one. To lose such a damning case also would very possibly energy the Justices(Roberts and Kennedy) to a more disfavorable opinion of the present Executive Branch and thus encourage certain SPINELESS opposition forces to press more constitutional issues. No, I do not believe that Cheney & Co want this particular fight at any cost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
6. I wish they could just change the locks on the WH, to keep
this thuggish regime out! during this holiday break.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
8. SO big deal..he gives in to every thing else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
9. Good. They need to continue to do this with every recess until the scum is gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Hopefully Reid has realized that. Why should anyone trust this admin? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
10. Good, that's his job. -n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
13. Well Harry Reid allowed a "Voice Vote" to confirm Julie Myers head of ICE
and she's a racist and nepotistic appointment. How many of the rest of them who were appointed by "voice vote" are as loathsome as she is? Did Harry give Bush everything but is throwing a bone to Dems who wanted Senate kept open to stop the recess appointments? If Reid already gave him everything he wanted...isn't this a hollow gesture? Doesn't Read know that we Dems are now onto his game? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
14. More shadow theater for the flock. Let laws through that last forever
but block appointments that will last a year...




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
15. The only way things will
get better, Harry, is when we impeach those evil sadists in the WH. They will never compromise...never admit wrong doing.

Impeach Now! Tis the season to impeach 4 TREASON....falalalalalalalalalalalalala!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
16. why the hell not? Why is he passing 40 republican nominations? Hold them.
Leverage. USe your power Senator!!!!!!! be a grinch for goodness' sakes. You are dealing with the devil and you don't want to be a grinch?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC