Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hayden testifies Addington, Gonzales, Bellinger [NSC] knew of CIA tapes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 08:03 AM
Original message
Hayden testifies Addington, Gonzales, Bellinger [NSC] knew of CIA tapes
White House Lawyers Told Of Videotapes
CIA Chief Says They Urged Caution in Destroying Tapes

By Michael Abramowitz and Joby Warrick
Washington Post Staff Writers
Thursday, December 20, 2007; Page A03

CIA Director Michael V. Hayden told lawmakers privately last week that three White House lawyers were briefed in 2004 about the existence of videotapes showing the interrogation of two al-Qaeda figures, and they urged the agency to be "cautious" about destroying the tapes, according to sources familiar with his classified testimony.

The three White House officials present at the briefing were David S. Addington, then Vice President Cheney's chief counsel; Alberto R. Gonzales, then White House counsel; and John B. Bellinger III, then the top lawyer at the National Security Council, according to Hayden's closed-door testimony before the Senate intelligence committee.

CIA Director Michael V. Hayden said the lawyers were told in 2004 about tapes showing detainee interrogations (By Melina Mara -- The Washington Post)

When told that some high-ranking CIA officials were demanding that the tapes be destroyed, the White House lawyers "consistently counseled caution," said one U.S. official familiar with Hayden's testimony. Another source said that Harriet E. Miers followed up with a similar recommendation in 2005, making her the fourth White House lawyer "urging caution" on the action.

The ambiguity in the phrasing of Hayden's account left unresolved key questions about the White House's role. While his account suggests an ambivalent White House view toward the tapes, other intelligence officials recalled White House officials being more emphatic at the first meeting that the videos should not be destroyed.


more at:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/19/AR2007121900699.html?hpid=moreheadlines
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Time for a Special Prosecutor.
The WH is pressuring the DoJ to stonewall. The DoJ is dirty in it, with the WH. This needs to become a criminal investigation by an independent prosecutor with real power.

INDICT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. Oh Yeah! I am sure Addington and Gonzales counselled 'Don't Destroy the Tapes!' Wanna buy a bridge?
Addington and Gonzales probably said just the opposite.

Addington may be the biggest threat to our democracy we have today. I can't see him being driven by right and wrong when his history is subvert any law that gets in his way to accomplishing the NeoCon Agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. more subpoenas that will be ignored by these filthy men.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. Then why did the NYT have to correct their sub title after "too much cappucino" Perino complained?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. NYT didn't have specifics, so the WH thought they could kill the story
of their involvement?

As soon as the "torture tape" story broke, I had a feeling it would reach the top. Who will be the first casualty?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC