Good lord! Can we all agree to just GET OVER the issues that relate to candidate's looks?

[IndyOp]

We have much, much more important issues that we need to spend our time discussing!

So Hillary has a few wrinkles? So what?


So Barack has big ears and a pointy chin? So what?


So John Edwards is drop-dead gorgeous and adores his beautiful wife, Elizabeth?


Right? :shrug:

:evilgrin:

[babylonsister]

1. Very funny.

:rofl:

[durrrty libby]

2. "and adores his beautiful wife, Elizabeth?"

Except for the illegitimate baby he is about to have. Some say:shrug:

[Name removed]

10. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[WorseBeforeBetter]

3. If you like Ken dolls.

But, yeah, he'd still get my vote. :-)

[sailor65]

4. If we're going for looks overall,

we need the OTHER Elizabeth in the White House!

[mmonk]

8. .

[Canuckistanian]

5. Limbaugh has talked about nothing else for three days

I say, keep talking about this issue.

If Limbaugh is tied up discussing his very own pet issue (co-sponsored with Drudge), it means the right is busy making itself irrelevant while the country deals with real issues.

Let the Congress battle on about FISA, contractor rapes and contempt subpoenas and we'll keep pushing our POV.

Let the RW discuss Hillary. Face it, it's all they have at this point.

[durrrty libby]

12. Seriously, how do people listen to him? I have tried a couple of times

He is just so obnoxious. Blech!

[mmonk]

6. Right.

[HeraldSquare212]

7. But can we still refer to Giuliani as Ghouliani? nt

[TexasProgresive]

9. I'd vote for any of these as long

as they are members of the Democratic party and would welcome their illegitimate children to be first bastards or whatever.

[Forkboy]

11. It's pretty dumb.