White House asks NYT to remove sub-headline from CIA tape story

[babylonsister]

http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/white-house-asks-nyt-to-remove-sub-headline-from-cia-tape-story-2007-12-19.html

White House asks NYT to remove sub-headline from CIA tape story
By Klaus Marre | Posted 12/19/07 9:20 AM
December 19, 2007


The White House on Wednesday took the rare step of publicly asking The New York Times to change the sub-headline of a story on the destruction of CIA tapes showing the interrogations of suspected terrorists.

At issue is the story’s sub-headline that stated: “White House Role Was Wider Than It Said.” The White House called this sub-headline inaccurate and demanded that it be corrected.

“Under direction from the White House General Counsel while the Department of Justice and the CIA Inspector General conduct a preliminary inquiry, we have not publicly commented on facts relating to this issue, except to note President Bush’s immediate reaction upon being briefed on the matter,” stated White House Press Secretary Dana Perino. “Furthermore, we have not described – neither to highlight, nor to minimize -- the role or deliberations of White House officials in this matter.”

The White House argues that the newspaper article implies that “there is an effort to mislead in this matter,” adding that such a conclusion is “pernicious and troubling.”

Catherine Mathis, senior vice president of corporate communications for the newspaper, stated that the sub-headline has been changed, adding that a correction would be printed. However, Mathis also pointed out that the White House did not challenge the contents of the article.

[Happyhippychick]

1. Oh that pesky "freedom of the press" amendment is getting in the way again.

Damn those journalists.

[louis-t]

2. Right, doesn't matter if it's true.

The damn liberal media are all out to embarrass "Team Bush".:eyes:

[LibDemAlways]

3. They went ahead and changed it like the good little toadies they

are. Pathetic.

[fed-up]

4. “there is an effort to mislead in this matter,” adding that such a conclusion is ACCURATE..nt