Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Airlines Lower Bar To Fill Pilot Ranks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-19-07 01:07 AM
Original message
Airlines Lower Bar To Fill Pilot Ranks
The Wall Street Journal

THE MIDDLE SEAT
By SCOTT MCCARTNEY

Airlines Lower Bar To Fill Pilot Ranks
Worsening Shortages Force Some Small Carriers to Hire
Younger, Less-Experienced Fliers; Raising the Retirement Age
December 18, 2007; Page D1

A world-wide shortage of pilots is putting less-experienced fliers at the controls of passenger jets and even forcing some airlines to cancel flights for a lack of crews. In the U.S., the pilot squeeze is being felt mostly at regional airlines -- carriers that feed passengers to bigger airlines using planes with fewer than 100 seats. Most regional airlines have lowered their experience-level requirements for new hires, and some have struggled to find pilots with enough hours in their logbooks to serve as captains. Pilots still have to pass tests at each airline and meet proficiency standards, but some aviation experts are concerned that that less-experienced pilots may not perform as well in emergencies or may be more prone to mistakes.

(snip)

The pilot shortage is the result of a combination of factors. Fast-growing foreign airlines and cargo carriers have sucked up pilots. Growth in the U.S. at discount airlines and private-jet companies has also led to surging demand for personnel. Newer carriers and fractional-jet companies have been hiring hundreds of pilots furloughed by major carriers, plus pilots who built some experience at lower-paying regional airlines. In the past year or two, major carriers have been recalling furloughed pilots as well, creating rapid turnover at regional airlines. At the same time, the U.S. military -- a major supplier of commercial airline staff -- has been turning out fewer pilots.

(snip)

The pilot shortage was a contributing factor in some flight cancellations this year, American Eagle says. To open its door to more candidates, Eagle lowered its minimum for experience this year to 600 hours total flying time from 800 hours, and will "look" at some candidates in the 500-hour range, Eagle spokeswoman Andrea Huguely said. "We do need more pilots," she said.

(snip)

Major airlines can still require several thousand cockpit hours of experience before taking the controls of Boeing and Airbus jets, and haven't had a shortage of applicants. But Mr. Darby thinks regional airlines will be forced to drop as low as FAA licensing minimums -- 250 hours to get a commercial license necessary to serve as a co-pilot -- and bigger airlines will ultimately feel the pinch. Concerned about the pilot shortage, Congress passed legislation last week raising the mandatory retirement age for U.S. commercial airline pilots to 65 from 60, and President Bush signed the law on Friday. That should at least temporarily slow the number of pilots that big airlines hire away from smaller carriers, but Mr. Darby says the change won't end the shortage. He estimates a net gain of about 1,500 pilots in the first year the retirement age is raised, while some 13,000 pilots were hired this year. Ultimately the U.S. may have to adopt new, quicker training models for pilots, Mr. Darby says, and airlines may have to start paying for early schooling for pilots and raise starting salaries for pilots, currently as low as $24,000 a year.

(snip)

Studies have been inconclusive on whether there's a link between accidents and experience for airline pilots. Several studies have found a U-shaped curve: Accident rates tend to be higher for less-experienced pilots, and for older pilots as well. Older pilots, the thinking goes, may have become complacent.

(snip)


URL for this article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119793945130135545.html (subscription)



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-19-07 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. Typical Wall Street Journal blame the X crap...
"...Ultimately the U.S. may have to adopt new, quicker training models for pilots, Mr. Darby says, and airlines may have to start paying for early schooling for pilots and raise starting salaries for pilots, currently as low as $24,000 a year...?"

Yeah, they wish! It was reported on the Public Radio show "Marketplace" a few years ago that the pilots that are flying you to the big Airports on the Regional Jets and prop planes with 9 to 60+ passengers and crew, who are under at least as much pressure (if not more) as the pilots of the "big Jets" are making (after taking out the cost of the uniforms and the cost of their training, which they pay for) between $12,000 to $24,000 Dollars per year!

And most of those smaller planes and jets don't practically land themselves like the big jets do, those guys, most of whom have to work a second job or extremely long hours (if they can get them) are doing it on too little sleep and ya know what, you're just as dead if a pilot making $60,000 to $200,000 Dollars crashes the Jet you're in as when a guy making $12,000 to $24,000 crashes the plane. Something to think about the next time you fly on one of the feeder jets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC