Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Waxman to Mukasey: Ahem

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 12:39 PM
Original message
Waxman to Mukasey: Ahem
http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/004935.php

Waxman to Mukasey: Ahem
By Paul Kiel - December 18, 2007, 12:10PM


Maybe his last letter got lost in the mail?

In a bit of epistolary throat-clearing, House oversight committee Chairman Henry Waxman (D-CA) wrote Attorney General Michael Mukasey today to reiterate his request two weeks ago. The White House has arbitrarily blocked former Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald from turning over records of his interviews during the Valeria Plame leak investigation of White House officials, including the President, Waxman wrote then, but it's your call, Mikey, not theirs, on whether to fork it over. Apparently Waxman got no response.

Waxman adds helpfully in his letter today (which you can read below) that since Scooter Libby has dropped his appeal, "there remains no further pending litigation associated with the Fitzgerald investigation."

He concludes: "I urge you to cooperate with Congress’ investigation into these unanswered questions."

Dear Mr. Attorney General:

On December 3, 2007, I wrote you to request documents from the Department of Justice from Special Counsel Patrick J. Fitzgerald’s investigation into the leak of the covert identity of CIA officer Valerie Plame Wilson. I have not received a response from you to my inquiry.

Since I wrote you on December 3, Lewis I. “Scooter” Libby has dropped the appeal of his criminal conviction arising from the Fitzgerald investigation. With that action, there remains no further pending litigation associated with the Fitzgerald investigation.

I do not regard the existence of an on-going investigation or pending litigation as a sufficient reason to withhold information from Congress. Now that Mr. Fitzgerald’s investigation and Mr. Libby’s appeal have both ended, however, there should be no basis for further delay in responding to the Committee’s request. Thus, I request that you provide the Committee by January 3, 2008, with the documents requested in the Committee’s July 16 letter to Mr. Fitzgerald, including the reports of interviews with President Bush, Vice President Cheney, and other White House officials.

Last week, you wrote several congressional committees about the investigation into the destruction of the CIA interrogation tapes. You resisted providing information to the committees because of your concern that providing information could undermine the Justice Department’s on-going investigation. In the Plame matter, there is no pending Justice Department investigation and no pending Justice Department litigation. Whatever the merits of the position you are taking in the CIA tapes inquiry, those considerations do not apply here.

There remain important questions about the leak of Ms. Wilson’s identity and the White House response that have not been answered by the prosecution and conviction of Mr. Libby and the commutation of his sentence. I urge you to cooperate with Congress’ investigation into these unanswered questions

If you have any questions regarding my request, please contact me personally or ask your staff to contact David Rapallo or Theodore Chuang of the Committee staff at (202) 225-5420.

Sincerely,

Henry A. Waxman
Chairman


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. While I applaud Waxman's persistence
another Strongly Worded Letter isn't sufficient imho. Good luck with that tact. Mukasey's the AG because he promised to stonewall, enable and faciliate BFEE and I will be damn surprised if he proves different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChiciB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. To Which I Agree... Nothing Less Than ACTION Means Anything To
me anymore! The Democratic Congress NEEDS to find some UNITY and SPINE and stick together and becoming a battering bull, EVEN IF they don't have the votes!

Keep sending the stuff back up and let The Idiot keep doing his thing! At the very least it will SHOW that they are at least TRYING! Right now, I'm so disgusted with them I don't know if I want to tell others I'm a Democrat!! I no longer will send ANY money to support any of them.

There are some GOOD ones, but there is NO UNITY!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. People are going to jail in 2009
bank on it. but no sooner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Howardx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. im not so sure about that
i tend to think the next president will decide the country "needs to heal" and wont do a damn thing about any high crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. strongly worded letters from senators brought about the Plame investigation in the first place
they wrote Ashcroft persistently for several months before he finally recused himself and turned it over to Comey, who appointed Fitz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC