Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Supreme Court Justice William J. Clinton?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bigmack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 01:18 AM
Original message
Supreme Court Justice William J. Clinton?
Justice Clinton?
By DOUGLAS W. KMIEC Wall Street Journal December 15, 2007; Page A13

snips

Hillary Clinton's commanding lead in the polls has diminished, and with Oprah Winfrey stumping for Barack Obama, she's called increasingly on the "star power" of husband Bill. But the ubiquitous presence of the former president on the campaign prompts a question: What will Hillary do with Bill if she is elected?

Of course, one might say Hillary has been wondering what to do with Bill for quite some time. But Mr. Clinton's prominent role in his wife's campaign -- whether going head to head with Oprah for airtime or defending Hillary from "swift-boat-like attacks" from rival Democrats -- has renewed the question: What exactly will he be doing on Jan. 21, 2009?

Several job ideas have already been floated. He might be appointed by Gov. Eliot Spitzer of New York to serve the remainder of Mrs. Clinton's U.S. Senate term. While there is precedent for former presidents -- even a former impeached president (Andrew Johnson) returning to the national legislative body -- few close to former President Clinton think being one of 100 would satisfy his boundless persona.

... if neither a Senate nor executive position will do, what does work? While it's probably not something the Hillary campaign would want us to contemplate, we should remember that there are three branches of government, and that it is widely anticipated that there will be one or more vacancies on the Supreme Court during the next presidential term.

Before dismissing the possibility of Justice William Jefferson Clinton, it is worth recalling a bit of history -- most notably, the history of another former president who landed on the Supreme Court, William Howard Taft.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119768946848431209.html?mod=most_emailed_day
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 01:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm sure President Edwards will consider it
And on another note, Clinton would make a terrible Senator; unless the plan is for him to hold the seat until Chelsea turns 30 and she can run for the seat herself. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proudmoddemo Donating Member (288 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 01:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. Nepotism and The Fact That He Was Disbarred By the Supreme Court Would be Problems
He'd never get confirmed, and rightly so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
3. what in the hell was dougie popping
when he had this hallucination? this is really to weird to comment on without laughing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 01:26 AM
Response to Original message
4. Aren't there other qualified people NOT named Clinton or Bush?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 02:57 AM
Response to Original message
5. Ambassador to the Court of St James.
That would keep him busy AND out of Hillary's hair, should she be elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:13 AM
Response to Original message
6. nope, too restricting for him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:23 AM
Response to Original message
7. His age and health alone should disqualify him for the SCOTUS
Edited on Sun Dec-16-07 03:24 AM by Hippo_Tron
If a Democratic President appoints a justice over the age of 55 then they're stupid. Roberts and Alito are going to be there for quite some time. We need to balance that out. I'd very seriously consider John Edwards for the position, however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC