|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Jackpine Radical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 12:08 PM Original message |
Poll question: Why won't Nancy put impeachment back on the table? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marylanddem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 12:11 PM Response to Original message |
1. because she's a collaborator? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNDemNY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 12:11 PM Response to Original message |
2. Other: She is trying to avoid jail in her complicity on torture. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zabet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 12:12 PM Response to Original message |
3. Because she... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
derby378 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 12:15 PM Response to Original message |
4. Hope she wasn't planning on running for President... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 12:25 PM Response to Original message |
5. THERE AREN'T THE VOTES FOR IT. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 12:33 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Exactly. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hlthe2b (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 01:36 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. I think it may be that calculated.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 01:50 PM Response to Reply #5 |
13. There aren't votes for it because there haven't been hearings. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 03:09 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. After all the stuff that's already come out, do you really think the Republicans are going to bend? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 06:01 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. That's fine- they can stand by the Bush team then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 01:51 PM Response to Reply #5 |
14. So illegality means nothing if those who would condone it are great in number. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 03:06 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. As long as at least 34 of them are senators, yes. It's the way the system works. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HCE SuiGeneris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 03:09 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Bullshit. We are a nation without laws if your "logic" is valid. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 03:14 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Like it or not, if you have 34 senators on your side, impeachment goes nowhere. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 12:33 PM Response to Original message |
6. 67. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyTiedye (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 12:44 PM Response to Original message |
8. The Purpose of All Those Executive Orders is Plain Enough |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 01:39 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. I see. FEAR of the MIGHT DO is greater than OUTRAGE about the HAS DONE? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kucinich4America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 01:42 PM Response to Original message |
11. I'm not so sure it's a matter of "corporate" sponsors... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 01:45 PM Response to Original message |
12. It might fail. The same reason there wasn't a revolution in 1776. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warren pease (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 06:04 PM Response to Original message |
20. Other: Because they're all members of the same cozy club and impeachment would be impolite. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 01st 2024, 09:07 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC