Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mercury in Mascara? Minn. Law Bans It

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-14-07 07:28 PM
Original message
Mercury in Mascara? Minn. Law Bans It
Mercury in Mascara? Minn. Law Bans It

By MARTIGA LOHN – 18 hours ago

ST. PAUL, Minn. (AP) — The quest for thicker lashes and defined eyes should get safer in Minnesota on Jan. 1, when a state law banning mercury from mascara, eye liners and skin-lightening creams takes effect.

Minnesota apparently is the first state in the nation to ban intentionally added mercury in cosmetics, giving it a tougher standard than the federal government.

Retailers who knowingly sell mercury-containing cosmetics in Minnesota could face fines of as much as $700. Penalties could reach $10,000 for manufacturers who fail to disclose mercury on product labels, according to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.

"Mercury does cause neurological damage to people even in tiny quantities," said Sen. John Marty, the Democrat from Roseville who sponsored the ban. "Every source of mercury adds to it. We wanted to make sure it wasn't here."

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5iwirqO43wxQESi5NchuDqLzHcC1QD8TH1RLO0
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-14-07 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Fortunately, I don't have to use mascara, as I have very dark hair and my eyelashes aren't skinny
.... but what about people that barely have eyelashes, or those that have short, skinny ones, or so blonde you can't see them? Does that mean they no longer have to struggle to look like magazine models?

Maybe if we women stopped wearing makeup altogether it would start a trend:


No more implants
No more facelifts
No more fake eyelashes
No more makeup
No more high heels
No more Victoria's Secret
No more hours at the hairstylist getting waxed, colored and styled
No more spending oodles of money at the dept. stores
No more tanning salons
No more starvation
No more exercise marathons
Then we'd take all that money we saved and travel or work less :-)

Oh boy am I dreaming or what?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TygrBright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-14-07 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Why wait for a trend? I already don't do any of that stuff. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC