Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Key to Opening the Gates of Hell? Another questionable slideshow. Bush Admin makes another weak case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Mugsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 10:19 AM
Original message
Key to Opening the Gates of Hell? Another questionable slideshow. Bush Admin makes another weak case
Key to Opening the Gates of Hell? Another questionable slideshow. Bush Admin makes another weak case to justify expanding war.

“The idea that somehow we’re manufacturing the idea that the Iranians are providing IEDs is preposterous” - President Bush, last Wednesday, Feb 14, 2007

You’ve probably noticed that the Bush Administration has been talking a lot about Iran lately and appear to be making the case for an invasion that we can neither afford, have the troops for, nor necessary.

(...)

Not unlike Colin Powell’s “devastating” slideshow making the case against Iraq at the U.N. in early 2003, the Bush Administration… proving they have learned NOTHING in the last four years, has produced a similar slideshow suggesting evidence of Iranian involvement in Iraq. The presentation does anything but. It makes a strong case that “EFP’s” (Explosively Formed Projectiles) are being used in Iraq… which no one has ever disputed and have been in use since 2004… and tells you that the weapons came from Iran… yet only one seizure actually took place at the Iraq/Iran border: a cache of TNT, not mortars or missiles. The ENTIRE basis for their claims of “Iranian government complicity” seems to be that capture of five Iranian officials in Iraq last month (see last weeks column) whose release was lobbied for by the President of Iraq. Let’s look at a few of the photos from that slideshow (this was the first photo to capture my attention):



This weapon was both made in “September, 2006″ and found “September 9, 2006″, barely more than a week later.

(...)

Also notice that the font and information on the weapon on the left looks nothing like the “confirmed Iranian munition” on the right (81 MM HE is 81mm “high explosive”). Some have pointed out that it seems highly unlikely that Iran… a longtime ally of Russia (and the Soviet Union before that)… would produce American-style 81mm mortars instead of the Soviet format 82mm shell size


(Continue with more photos on "Mugsy's Rap Sheet":
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mugsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. Please bump
Please bump this post so others get a chance to read it. Thx.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. It certainly is preposterous
that they’re manufacturing the idea that the Iranians are providing IEDs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. K &R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mnemosyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
4. Liars, one and all. knr n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mugsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Read the rest
Hopefully, others are going onto read the full story.

The case the WH is making for WAR is soooo incredibly weak, it's frightening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ItsTheMediaStupid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Even M$M is questioning the reports
That is the good news.

The bad news is their willingness to publish this stuff with unnamed sources that has a 90% chance of being bogus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mnemosyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. And they don't give a damn that it is weak either.
A very frightening time in the world, completely agree.

The harder the BS is pushed, the clearer it is shown as BS - to those of us with IQ's.

Mad world Mugsy, simply mad. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Czolgosz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. Mugsy rocks!
I'll be sending this link around. Thanks.

--IMM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC