Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

1960: Who Would You Have Supported

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 05:03 PM
Original message
1960: Who Would You Have Supported
With a tight primary race shaping up in Iowa, I was looking back on another hard fought primary...1960. Suppose we could transport back to that time...I'd be curious who DU'ers would have supported.

The major candidates:

J F Kennedy - The "young upstart"...wealth, name, good looks but served less than a term in the Senate...considered by many to be too conservative on most social issues, a war hawk and his religion was considered an issue.

Lyndon Johnson - not quite the LBJ we saw later...he was still a supporter of the Dixiecrat "Southern and States rights" wing of the party. No, not racist, but at that point he was in the "don't ask, don't tell" with others who would soon leave the Democratic party for Nixon's "Southern Strategy". He was the Senate majority leader, lots of experience, a real power broker, non-nonsense on defense and a moderate on many social issues.

Hubert Humphrey - The Happy Warrior...representative of the labor and "liberal" wing of the party. Hubert personified the New Deal spirit of the post war years and was an early supporter of the civil rights struggle and other issues that many current Progressives and Liberals can relate to. His problem was he was considered weak on defense and this was right in the midst of the hot era of the Cold War.

There were other candidates as well, but those were the top three. This primary was just a little before my time...I barely recall seeing JFK's inauguration right before my 5th birthday (and yes, I vividly recall 11/22/63). I'm sure there are other DU'ers who have better recollections that could share them...and to see how today's Democrats would line up if faced with these choices.

Discuss...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. I was born in 1967 so no first hand knowledge here
but I think I would have been a Humphrey man if I had been around then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emmadoggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Me too - on both counts.
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. The Democrats in my family supported Humphrey. I liked Kennedy.
I was in high school. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. Were You From A Labor Family?
My parents started as strong Humphrey supporters...they were very pro-union and he was their man. Kennedy was very much like Obama...inexperienced and young...(even though JFK was a year older than my father). They saw Humphrey as part of the FDR legacy...moreso than Stevenson or anyone else. But they became strong Kennedy supporters later on.

I see an interesting parallel between JFK and Obama in that both were knocked for their inexperience (Kennedy made his name as the rising star in the '56 convention like Obama did at the '04 one) and that both had to overcome a hurdle...Kennedy's Catholocism and Obama's race...where others had failed, they stood the best and most credible opportunity to shatter those barriers.

Just observations to waste away a Saturday afternoon.

Cheers...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. You got it. Pro-union, protestant, blue-collar, New Deal Democrats.
Edited on Sat Dec-08-07 07:18 PM by TahitiNut
... at least that's what the "political" part of my family was. Then there've been a scattering of Republicans, Perotistas, and Dixiecrats. (My father was a Wallace Dixiecrat.)

I come by my staunch (anti-partisan) independent LIBERAL stances the old-fashioned way: I EARNED them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taterguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hubert Humphrey because he's named after the place where the Twins play
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. I was 11 years old when
that primary took place. Since I lived in another part of the country at the time, i was quite unaware of the primary.

We were Roman Catholics ourselves, all four of my grandparents came from Ireland, and needless to say my parents became enthusiastic supporters of John Kennedy.

As an adult, I am not religious, do not belong to a church or any organized religion. I suspect, that were the person I am now an adult in 1960, I'd have been a Humphrey supporter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. My heart was with JFK
even though my mother was, at the time, a staunch Republican. She was for Margaret Chase Smith. Back then, there were critters called "liberal Republicans" who believed in a liberal social agenda and a conservative fiscal policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. kennedy
my sister was a huge kennedy fan. he was her generation as bobby was mine. the world would be far different if these to men were not murdered
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. Before my time; and obviously I wouldn't have been voting anyway
but I think I would have preferred Humphrey, then Kennedy, then Johnson.

Over here, I suppose I'd have been voting for Labourite Gaitskell against Tory Macmillan, not dreaming that one day our Labour leaders would be well to the right of Macmillan, let alone Gaitskell (who was considered on the right of his party at that time).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. Humphrey was my choice. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
10. I would have been for Humphrey
He had a superb record on civil rights. He was closest to me ideologically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. I voted for JFK in 1960
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustAnotherGen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
12. Humphrey
Hands down, Humphrey.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
13. i was a kid but my parents voted for Kennedy....probably would have to
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
14. Definitely Humphrey
I am was not around back then, but I have never understood the huge appeal of JFK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
15. I was eight years old and had a poster of JFK above my bed in Texas.
John Kennedy was just electric back then. We were robbed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brazos121200 Donating Member (626 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
16. I was 15 when the 1960 primariy season took place.
Adlai Stevenson who had already lost twice to Dwight Eisenhower was also a candidate that year as wa sSen Stuart Syminton of Missouri. I was too young to really care about politics then but I remember JFK's great stage presence and charisma, although I didn't know what it was called then. Stevenson was a terrible campaigner and would probably have lost again if he had ran. Johnson was pretty much a southern gentleman Democrat although he had some liberal tendencies. Humphrey seemed boring to me and thought he looked more like a republican than a democrat. I probably would have supported Kennedy if I had been able to vote. I'm glad I wouldn't have supported Humphrey since he was such a yes man for Johnson during the Vietnam war until nearly the very end of the 1968 campaign when he saw he would lose unless he quit supporting the war. They were all flawed candidtates in one way or another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
17. Not only who *would* I have, but who I *did* support: LBJ
Edited on Sat Dec-08-07 06:13 PM by UTUSN
I wasn't of voting age. My older sister came home from college on holidays with a total schoolgirl crush on JFK. She was known as the not-smart-one of us three kids.

I, who had read a 7 volume biography of Woodrow WILSON, considered her choice frivolous and insubstantial.

After JFK won the election, he won me over with the lofty rhetoric and the supposedly classy patina.

Now in the sourness of age, what sticks out more than anything for me is the TRIVIALITY of how our political system works and how by-a-hairsbreath we have survived more times than I care to know about, given the WHIMS of people in power. And about the supremacy of petty personality conflicts at our highest levels that push us this way or that. Whims.

Of the three KENNEDYs, I think that Ted will end up with the most substantial accomplishments.


It sickens me that today's Tweety and RUSSERT pretend to be JFK-ites, which amounts to Catholic school nostalgia, while they daily bash true Dem ideas. Yeah, today RUSSERT did a full lap dance with Caroline KENNEDY about another one of her books of candied nostalgia. This gives him credentials as a Lib spokesman, which he uses the rest of the year to slaughter working stiff Dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Perspective Gets Lost
A reason I brought up this race is the perceptions of history vs. the realities of the time. These three men were complex people who, as I'm seeing, evoked both positive and negative reactions. A lot, IMHO, is the filter of time and
"legacy". Some here are sure to read what you've posted and not relate...and symbolizes similiar divisions we're seeing today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. HaHAH!1 "Some here ...not relate" to my post!1 Welcome to my DU life!1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Progress And Change Donating Member (617 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
19. Humphrey
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tech3149 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
21. I was only a kid then, but Kennedy was inspirational
I grew up learning about the great things FDR did to save the country and the neighboring town was named after his wife. I saw Jack Kennedy as being the FDR of our time. Like FDR, he wasn't perfect, but he did more good than harm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
23. If I'd been old enough, either Stuart Symington or Hubert Humphrey...two genuine giants...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
postulater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
24. I got Humphrey's autograph
when he stopped at our town square during the primaries.

And JFK slept at my uncle's house. My uncle was local democratic connection and was from Boston so they had a lot to talk about.

But I was only nine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC