Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why on EARTH would anyone want to make a movie of "Atlas Shrugged"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 05:17 PM
Original message
Why on EARTH would anyone want to make a movie of "Atlas Shrugged"?
Blah!

I'm especially surprised that Angelina Jolie is going to play Dagny Taggart. She never struck me as the "objectivist" type..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'd call that a major sellout on her part. And besides, isn't Dagny a blonde?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. She didn't do it for the money, she did it because she WANTED to do it
Apparently she's a fan :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
19. And here I thought she had a social conscience.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #19
60. Yes, please disregard all the work she has done for good
just because she's playing a character. They say that being able to argue both sides is a sign of intelligence, but for you it just means someone is a sellout.


Gotta love the D.U. !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunkerbuster1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
61. Ewww! Grosss!
Whatever fantasy appeal that starlet may have held for me just went in the crapper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musette_sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. to "catapult the propaganda"?
after all, it's the Norquist/Ron Paul gospel of "I Got Mine, Screw You Jack".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phillysuse Donating Member (683 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's the right wing media - I would be interested in
who is financing this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
40. I would think that even people with weak finances can
accumulate enough money for a movie if they pool their funds and save for 50 years. Atlas Shrugged in copyright 1957.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. There's probably a large market of insomniacs out there waiting to buy it. - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well The Fountainhead sucked as a book and a movie
so I'm pretty confident that this will be a major film disaster as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. I remember watching that in a friend's architecture class.
Raymond Massey, Gary Cooper and Patricia Neal.
Aggghhhh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. a lot of that had to do with gary cooper being such an atrocious...actor?
if you'd call what he did "acting" :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ToeBot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #14
31. Every time I see one of his movies I say something similar, my parents act like I spit on them..
I just don't get it, a cardboard cut-out could give a more moving performance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #14
62. I really like Gary Cooper's acting
He sucked in The Fountainhead, but everyone sucked in that movie.

Generally, though, he done some really good things as an actor. He has a real underplayed wry humor in many of his roles. For an example, see The Westerner. He and Walter Brennan are great in that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raejeanowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. Oh, Goodie
An agonizingly boring polemic book revisited as an agonizingly boring polemic movie. With an "intellectual" like Jolie starring; what does this tell you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Touchdown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
8. It'll have to be a comedy. I hope Paul Verhoeven directs it.
Look what he did with Starship Troopers? Took a military worshipping paen to authoritarian rule and stripped it naked for the fascist polemic it was. :rofl:

Then there's his anti-corporate Robocop and Total Recall.

No, I'm not a Heinlein fan.;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Vadim Perelman?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
I work for workers Donating Member (551 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
21. Starship Troopers really wasn't an authoritarian book.
The movie followed it so loosely it's hard to recognize the source material sometimes.

Heinlein's scifi was all over the political spectrum, don't judge him based of one bad interpretation of one story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Touchdown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #21
33. I read that book. It was a military worshipping polemic.
It was unmistakable. In a 190 page teenager's adventure book, it takes two chapters (the old teacher's letter's to Johnny), to describe how democracy failed, and that those who don't serve are weak and undeserving, it's a polemic.

As far as the movie is concerned. I've read ST recently enough to know that quite a bit of dialog was lifted straight from the book, especially Ratcheck's classroom talk, so it's not as badly interpreted as Heinlein's fans would like to pretend. It's just that when the romanticism of military rule in the book was directly translated into film, it showed the ideology for the fascist polemic it was. Naked, and raw fascism.

No, there weren't any mobile suits, or arachnid spacecraft, but the central thrust of the book was all in the film.

Verhoeven is a smart-ass, and most of his films are politically satirical, and very critical of human nature, but as a Dutch man who lived through German occupation as a boy, I think he's well qualified to recognize fascism when he sees it. Much more than the American Robert Heinlein, who was barred from service because of physical limitations, and spent some time in his life feeling deprived of that heroism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
I work for workers Donating Member (551 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. Your post is full of inaccuracies.
The movie inserted a fascist climate that was not present in the book. It was very militaristic, but it didn't describe enough of the non-military life to describe it as fascist. There was no direct military government. If anything, the book makes clear that humanity was united under a democracy, albeit one in which suffrage had to be earned through some form of national service.

Heinlein served in the Navy for five years. Despite the ridiculous accusations people toss at him because of that terrible movie, his fiction was across the board when it comes to politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paladin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #37
44. I Loved The Movie

Like I've posted before: You gotta love any flick that dresses up Doogie Howser in an SS uniform......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Touchdown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #37
45. I read it twice. Got fascism both times.
Edited on Sat Dec-08-07 08:56 PM by Touchdown
So, I'm sorry I recognized it if I wasn't supposed to. EDIT: The second time was at the challenge of a Heinlein apologist like you.

Democratic? Those who don't serve in national service, can't be elected in government, or have any say in how their governed. That is the antithesis of democracy.

I read Stranger too. He spent a bit of time ruminating over libertarianism as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Geoff R. Casavant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. Well, have you seen "Dude, Where's My Car?"
They'll make a movie about anything these days. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Don't laugh, I was entertained by "Dude, Where's My Car"
This coming from a self-admitted film snob who likes only one or two movies every five years.

The movie sucked hard, but it was still entertaining. :) I guess I just like stoner flicks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Geoff R. Casavant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Just last night, we rented "Harold and Kumar"
And that was surprisingly enjoyable for a stoner flick.

But "Dude" just sucked out loud, man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spoony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 04:54 AM
Response to Reply #16
53. Doogie Howser made that film.
Edited on Sun Dec-09-07 04:54 AM by spoony
His scenes catapulted it into another strata of stoner movie, lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zorahopkins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
13. Shrug
I don't know.

Shrug.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Lol! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
15. Well, she's not much of an actress to begin with. Now we know she's not the
sharpest tack in the box, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ezlivin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. The sharpest two tacks in the box, actually
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trailrider1951 Donating Member (933 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #15
28. Well, I beg to differ
her portrayal of Lisa in "Girl Interrupted" was absolutely chilling. Rent it.

But, her talent as an actress is independent of her intellectual talent. I do not have enough information to give an adequate assessment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #28
49. Saw it. Stunk. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
20. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #20
56. Thank you
That is wonderful
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
22. What does that mean - that Atlas carried the weight of the world on his shoulders
and then shrugged it off by not caring?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #22
36. Pretty much. Here's the David Zephyr synopsis of Rand's silly book.
In a capsule that would save you from reading the book: All of the wonderful great capitalists who carry the entire world on their burdened shoulders just finally get tired of being criticized and taxed and penalized for all they do and so they decide to "shrug" and drop the co-dependent crybabies that depend on them. --DZ on Atlas Shrugged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #36
57. Thanks. Paraphrased - unable to control their gluttony, the parasites killed their host.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
I work for workers Donating Member (551 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
23. It will be fun to see the Galt speech cut down to size.
It was something like 70 pages long. You could make a feature length film out of that speech alone, but the director will still have to fit another 900 pages of fun into three hours.

This will be a disaster of epic proportions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #23
39. I hope they don't cut a word of it!
People who go see the movie should get the full effect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alphafemale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
24. Bloated, endless, pointless self-important dialogue by boring characters.
WOW! Sounds like box office GOLD!!!!!

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. sounds in the spirit of that awful Scientologist move by John Travolta
what was it, Battlefield against the Evil Psychologists, or something like that? Crazed cults that turn out bad Hollywood movies seems to be an interesting trend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dorian Gray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
26. Good Lord!
I have no idea why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
27. this thread was near this one when I saw it:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFriendlyAnarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
29. I liked Atlas Shrugged.
:shrug: even if you don't like the thoughts it puts forth, I still enjoyed the plot and the characters. John Galt is my screen name many places.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #29
41. I liked it too. Still have a copy. Plan to reread it. Enjoyed the plot, the mystery of 'who is JG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #29
43. I thought it an entertaining read, also
It's easy to see why AJ would take the part -- it's a strong woman lead role.

I wonder how many people responding to this thread have actually read the book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Touchdown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #43
46. I don't need to shave my ass and sit in a bowl of gin to know it's painful
The book is part of American literary history, and as such one can cull it's meaning from many other sources that have discussed it's themes. I don't need to endure 1000+ pages of over-used adverbs to "understand".

Rand never read Kant, but she criticized him anyhow. What's good for the goose...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. Well I guess you answered my query
I presume you've never read Kant, either, because you heard he can be a painful read, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Touchdown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #47
58. I read enough about her and her quotes, to know about her.
As I said (that you conveniently ignored in typical Randian fashion), she is part of the American lexicon and thus doesn't need to be endured to know about her. So much has been written about her, and her followers that putting up with her root canal writing isn't necessary. It's impossible to go through life and not hear the phrases "One ring to rule them all." "It was the best of times, it was the worst of times." "Big Brother is watching you." "Please Sir. May I have some more?". and ..."Who is John Galt?"

But, I don't speak for others. You have to query the rest of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #43
51. Probably more than you'd think.
Edited on Sun Dec-09-07 02:23 AM by SemiCharmedQuark
I was required to read it and the Fountainhead. I think both are popular assignments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
30. It'd have to be better than the movies of "urban novels"
The Special Edition DVD of "Bright Lights, Big City" includes a hose and you use it to vacuum out your car, it sucks so bad.

This one has got to be better. Not a hell of a lot better, but some.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 03:10 AM
Response to Original message
32. catapult the propaganda... Monty Python style n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
34. Atlas Shat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
35. They want to encourage travel by rail.
It's environmentally friendly.

Of course, it's possible that they'll rewrite it to replace the railroad executive with a trucking company executive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
38. ATLAS SHRUGGED II:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philosophie_en_rose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
42. For the return of Mystery Science Theater 3000?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
48. She's an actress; that's what they do.
Edited on Sun Dec-09-07 12:34 AM by Blue_In_AK
She won't BE Dagny Taggart, just playing the role. Brad Pitt was a serial killer in Kalifornia -- that doesn't make him one. Geez, give her a break.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #48
50. Ok let me rephrase: I'm surprised she's a fan of Ayn Rand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #50
55. Sorry for snarkiness last night...
Politics had me in a bad mood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 04:08 AM
Response to Original message
52. What do you mean? The growth of cruelty and callousness in Imperial Amerika is the largest
growth industry we have.

No other industry, and all of it's related industries, prison, interrogation, surveillance, propaganda, has the growth potential that these do.

Bar none.

"Atlas Shrugged" naturally is part of the continuing plan of Bushie Totalitarians to control every aspect of Imperial Amerikan life and thought.

"Some people matter, and some don't..."

I think the Imperial Subjects of Amerika are ready to take the next leaps to grow the creulty and callousness-realted industries. We are more than ready to be whatever our rulers want us to be.

Nothing less and nothing more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tommy_Carcetti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
54. Well, hell, if they could make "Battlefield Earth"
What's going to stop them from making some Rand screed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
59. Roger Eberts
review of L. Ron Hubbards battlefield Earth is a funny read. I imagine hollywood will do as good a job on Atlas Shrugged. For the record hanging out in Hollywood I've seen more than one producer reading the book. I think there's a certain sector of society that likes to hear that type of self serving message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
63. $$$
Movies based on books which a lot of people have read tend to do well at the box office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC