Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Officer Fired After Suing Victim's Family

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 11:38 AM
Original message
Officer Fired After Suing Victim's Family
Officer Fired After Suing Victim's Family

CASSELBERRY, Fla. -- A police sergeant has been fired for suing a family after she slipped and fell while trying to rescue a 1-year-old boy from drowning, according to authorities.

Casselberry Police Chief John Pavlis fired Sergeant Andrea Eichhorn on Tuesday.

Eichhorn has dropped her negligence lawsuit. It claimed there was water on the floor at Joey Cosmillo's home when police arrived. Eichhorn claimed she broke her knee and missed two months of work after she slid on the wet floor.

The boy suffered brain damage and can no longer walk, talk or swallow. He lives in a nursing home and eats and breathes through tubes.

http://www.local6.com/news/14779398/detail.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cgrindley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. America... it's no surprise that a personal injury lawyer is running for prez (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denverbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Yeah, fuck Abraham Lincoln and everyone like him!
Lawyers should be banned from being lawmakers generally, especially when there are actors, career politicians, and spoiled rich kids who would make much better elected officials.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cgrindley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Abraham Lincoln was a Republican railway lawyer...
and unless you're utterly ignorant about history, his motives for freeing the slaves, the process by which he came to the conclusion to free them, and the way that he prosecuted the Civil War--although ultimately for the best--were not terribly progressive. Of course the Dems at the time were fairly reprehensible, but that's beside the point. Lincoln isn't one of ours. He just happened to do the right thing at the right time. The same can be said of other Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denverbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. The Republican Party was the liberal party in 1860.
You can quibble all you want about Lincoln's motivations and what he might have or would have done, but you can't argue with the published Republican Party Platform of 1860 in which 6 of the 16 planks related directly to slavery, while the final 6 are clearly progressive in nature.

The Republican Party was liberal right up until Teddy Roosevelt finally bolted the party and ran as a Bull Moose because, in his opinion, it wasn't liberal enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Let me guess -- you'd prefer either a corporate lawyer or a Hollywood star?
Edited on Wed Dec-05-07 12:31 PM by brentspeak
BTW, you forgot to mention that Edwards -- the target of your attack -- is a former U.S. Senator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cgrindley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. wow
so is Fred Thompson... being a former US senator really doesn't mean shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. I'm afraid I don't understand your point...
I'm afraid I don't understand your point. What are the precise and relevant similarities between a cop deciding against pursuing civil litigation, and a lawyer running for President?

Should lawyers be barred from running for President? Is there some moral prohibition that you believe should be in place to prevent them from running?

Maybe the candidate you're most opposed to was a lawyer at some point and this is merely some clever way to illustrate that...?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cgrindley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. I'm criticizing the cult of personal injury lawyers--who are scum
let's get this clear. If you're a personal injury lawyer, you're a bottom feeder. There's nothing lower.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kanrok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. LOL...how bitter of you
Sounds like someone was bitten by a trial lawyer as a child. How sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. do you honestly know ANYTHING...?
about the kinds of cases that john edwards took on as a personal injury lawyer?

you might want to research that a little bit before all your gum-flapping makes you look like too much of a bitter moran.

and it might even be too late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. That poor family!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. Why did the family block the homeowner insurance.........
from settling? Amazing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cgrindley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Uh... because the officer didn't deserve a cent? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Probably because this HAD TO BE an on-the-job workman's comp
injury. The homeowner was not the least bit liable and the homeowner's insurance should not have had to pay a dime.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kanrok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Um, no.
There is a W/C case, but that is not the only remedy unless it occurred on city property. A person, like this police officer can maintain (and has every legal right to do so) a W/C case simultaneously with a common law case of negligence against the homwowners, if, and only if, there is negligence attributable to the homeowner that was "a" cause of the police officer's injury. (BTW, that does not mean that the police officer would recieve a "double recovery" since any third-party payment would reduce the amount of money W/C would ultimately pay). There are no facts in this blurb of a story that tell us one way or another if there was negligence attributable to the homeowners. All the article says is that the police officer slipped on some water. That tells us absolutely nothing about any potential negligence or lack of same. Knee-jerk reactions to this story are just that. Opinions are nice, but having opinions based on fact are preferable. Here we have very little in terms of facts, so I can't see how anybody with a fair sense of what is right or wrong can jump to any conclusions about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. How about THIS knee-jerk opinion, then:
This cop is a major first-class asshole who deserved to be fired. Frankly, IMHO, she deserves even worse. I won't go into what I REALLY think she deserves for suing the child's family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kanrok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Oh, That's better...
Rational discussion is not in your arsenal, I'm guessing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. I'm not interested in a rational discussion of this person who
kicked a family when it was down for something that IS NOT NEGLIGENCE.

Have you ever heard of AN ACCIDENT???? On the job????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
11. Why didn't she just taser them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. She was lying in a puddle of water.
Otherwise, a no-brainer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC