http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1517">1517: Martin
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_luther">Luther penned his
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_95_Theses">eloquent dissent, decrying the quid pro quo of Papal indulgences. Did the Church use much of the money received for good works? Sure, Luther conceded. But was the practice still wrong? He concluded it was.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1607">1607: A mere 90 years later, the wave of Luther's dissent came crashing ashore and established a beachhead at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jamestown_settlement">Jamestown. When I was there recently, I was struck anew - as I am during each visit - by just how fortunate we are to be descended from such plucky folks, who were unafraid to act on their dissent.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1775">1775: Things came to a boil 168 years later when another dissenter,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrick_Henry">Patrick Henry, gave his fellow members of the
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia_House_of_Burgesses">House of Burgesses in
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colonial_Williamsburg">Williamsburg something to ponder: is a lack of liberty preferable to death? Even those who disagreed vociferously with Henry found him to be a companionable drinking buddy after a session in the Burgesses: a quality still found in the finest discussion forums. When Burgess is a family middle name, it's hard not to feel a little overawed when visiting Williamsburg, as I did recently.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1860">1860: The more perfect Union had a design flaw, and 85 years after the dissent of 1775, some "loud-mouthed dissenters" were no longer willing to perpetuate that design flaw or ignore it. The election of
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham_lincoln">Abraham Lincoln kept faith with Patrick Henry's challenge of liberty or death.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007">2007: If it's really true that there's nothing new under the sun, then I doubt that Martin Luther would be surprised to see
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=2388709&mesg_id=2388709">the reaction of the Clinton camp to the suggestion that selling secular indulgences for pardons is wrong, and that the ends don't justify the means.
- Dave