Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Solid, Logical Reason It's Time to See More Female CEOs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 07:24 AM
Original message
A Solid, Logical Reason It's Time to See More Female CEOs
Edited on Fri Nov-30-07 07:26 AM by Crisco
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7108347.stm

On receiving a paypacket, how good a man feels depends on how much his colleague earns in comparison, scientists say.

Scans reveal that being paid more than a co-worker stimulates the "reward centre" in the male brain.
...
In the study, 38 pairs of male volunteers were asked to perform the same simple task simultaneously, and promised payment for success.

Both "players" were asked to estimate the number of dots appearing on a screen. Providing the right answer earned a real financial reward between 30 (£22) and 120 (£86) euros. Each of the participants was told how their partners had performed and how much they were paid.
...
A wrong answer, and no payment, resulted in a reduction in blood flow to the "reward region". But the area "lit up" when volunteers earned money, and interestingly showed far more activity if a player received more than his partner.


Now, here's a story from my local news:

http://tennessean.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071130/BUSINESS01/71130002

The Tennessee Valley Authority is giving its CEO a $1 million pay raise to keep pace with executive pay packages in the private sector.
...
Consultants Watson Wyatt & Co. recommended an $800,000 base salary and a total package worth $2.9 million, based on comparable investor-owned utilities that pay their chief executive officers up to $5.9 million a year.


And there's the old adage of how the average CEO earns some 364 times more than the average salaried person in their company.

Need I connect the dots?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PetrusMonsFormicarum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. Not so black and white
and not so logical. Not all males are motivated by cashgrabbing, just as not all males are motivated by boobs.

And the CEO of my company is a fascist asshat whose salary (when SHE was brought onboard) reduced staff profit shares from a nice extra paycheck to a post-Holidays pittance.

Assholes come in all shapes, sizes and genders. So do people who are motivated by truth, beauty and wisdom.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. Carly Fiorina.
Edited on Fri Nov-30-07 07:49 AM by HughBeaumont
Last I checked, gender doesn't prevent a CEO from being a greedy assvacuum. Her idea of great management was to fire everyone, spent more to stay in the same place, and to top it off received 21 million dollars among other exit perks for her underperformance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. I agree with feminisms basic tenets, which is why...
I disagree that the most a woman can aspire to {within the prevailing ideological framework} is assimilating to man's most loathsome traits and characteristics in hopes of playing a more predatory role within the corporate pathology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. Not so logical, not so solid.
You seem to assume that since men are like this, women aren't. And that's not on the basis of empirical evidence, but logic.

Reduced to formula: X --> Y ==> NOT X --> NOT Y is, well, simply false. "Human --> mortal ==> NOT human --> NOT mortal" shows this clearly enough, unless we suddenly claim all sparrows and zebras are immortal. QED.

In other words, showing that men have this property of liking to be rewarded more than their peers has no bearing on whether or not women don't have this property. For that, you need empirical evidence--showing that only men are like this is equivalent to showing that women aren't like this, but in practice that means demonstrating empirically that women aren't like this (so the logic is beside the boards).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lilith Velkor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. No need, I see the sexism of your premise quite clearly
I always thought you were more intelligent than that. Perhaps this is a bit tongue-in-cheek?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Somewhat Tongue In Cheek
Although, I must say I find the response to the thread quite fascinating.

We have a genuine problem with overpaid CEOs. We have companies that need to attract qualified talent. We have a scientific study that shows men get off on knowing they are making more than the next guy. While we don't have a corresponding study for women, does your own experience or anecdotal knowledge follow a parallel?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lilith Velkor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Hell no.
Women can be just as greedy and vicious as men, we just get fewer opportunities to do so because of institutionalized sexism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC