Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WTF! NYT AWOL on the McClellan bombshell two consecutive days. Will Friday make three?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-22-07 09:31 PM
Original message
WTF! NYT AWOL on the McClellan bombshell two consecutive days. Will Friday make three?
Not a single word in the print edition. Two straight days. I checked both papers twice.

On Olbermann's broadcast on Wednesday, John Dean said Scottie's story, if true, was much worse than anything Richard Nixon did.

Yet the New York Times, the paper of record, gives its readers not a clue.

Does Bill Keller have the guts to ignore the story for a third consecutive day?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mutineer Donating Member (659 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-22-07 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Scottie-Boy has now more or less issued a retraction
saying the president didn't lie to him. I guess no one cares that it still means the VP and everyone else was lying to him. Plus lying to your press secretaries is something that seems to happen in every administration. They are purposefully left out of the loop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-23-07 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. Retracting his own quote?
Hilarious. It's as if he never left....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-23-07 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. You must take into account republicon mindset
republicons are not like normal Americans.

Lies and "mis-speaking" are their THING. The only thing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-22-07 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Actually if they continue in the mode they are in,
they better start thinking about what happened to the newspaper of note during Hitler's time and what the owner got for his troubles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-22-07 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. This would be a good question to ask the Public Editor.
I miss real newspapers. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Didereaux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-22-07 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. its a non-story unless and until a flat statement is made...the publisher has closed that door.
An page A28 story for NYT at the very best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-22-07 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. Isn't This Still A Rumor That's Being Backpeddled On?
They've gotten caught before in a trap set by the Bushies to get the Times to publish stuff that makes them look foolish. They won't print until it's in print and they have the context correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-22-07 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. could this be the reason ?--->
"2005-02-24 REPORTER\'S PRIVILEGE UPHELD IN ISLAMIC CHARITY INVESTIGATION. A federal judge in New York has ruled that telephone records of two New York Times reporters may not be disclosed to federal prosecutors in Chicago. U.S. Attorney Patrick J. Fitzgerald, who is also the special prosecutor in the unrelated Valerie Plame investigation,

----->subpoenaed the phone records of reporters Judith Miller, who is also under subpoena in the Plame investigation, and Philip Shenon in a grand jury investigation into whether government agents leaked a planned raid on an Islamic charity suspected of funding terrorists. Prosecutors contend, and the Times denies, that the charity was alerted to the raid when the reporters who received the leak called the charity for comment.<---------

U.S. District Judge Robert W. Sweet ruled that Miller and Shenon's telephone records were protected by a qualified reporter's privilege under the First Amendment and federal common law, and that prosecutors had failed to overcome the privilege."



http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/news.aspx?id=14876
firstamendmentcenter.org: news
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-22-07 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. Even I post stories months before the useless Times does
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rageneau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-22-07 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. No NYT = No Iraq War, no Whitewater investigation, no 'Gore invented the Internet', etc.
The New York Whore Times occasionally does a good job, not because it tries to, but because it has so many good writers, a few of them are honest and can get things past the editors.

Considering its position and obligation, the New York Times has done more damage to our democracy than it has done good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-23-07 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
9. 3rd straight day without mentioning Scott McClellan -- not one single word
disappointing.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-23-07 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
11. I see one story buried in the 'US' section online:
Edited on Fri Nov-23-07 04:28 PM by IDemo
(registration may be required)

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Press-Secretary-Books.html

Looks to be more concerned with the "dilemma" former staffers face with tell-all books than it does with the actual story itself..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-23-07 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. but nothing in the print edition
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnotherMother4Peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-23-07 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
14. But...but... but, Natalie Holloway - that's important: More Natalie Holloway
Our president & vice president outing CIA agents: jeopardizing the lives of those who serve our nation in such a heroic and dangerous way. Endangering their lives, and the lives of those they've dealt with. Sending the message to present & potential covert agents: your identity is NOT protected. That sounds like headline news to me. But all we get is crap news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-23-07 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
15. Mike Malloy is talking about this now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC