Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Battle over wiretapping bill looms in Senate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 01:28 PM
Original message
Battle over wiretapping bill looms in Senate
Battle over wiretapping bill looms in Senate
By Manu Raju | Posted: 11/16/07/ 1:16 p.m.
November 16, 2007


Long-shot Democratic presidential candidate Chris Dodd renewed his threat Friday to derail the Senate’s plan to consider new restrictions to President Bush’s foreign-intelligence surveillance program if retroactive legal protections are proposed for telephone companies that allegedly wiretapped U.S. citizens without a warrant.

The Connecticut senator told reporters Friday that he is “vehemently opposed to retroactive immunity” and that he would use any “vehicle available , including a filibuster.”

That could complicate the Senate’s plans to consider a bill approved by the Intelligence Committee last month that would grant retroactive immunity to the telephone companies that allegedly participated in the program after the 2001 terrorist attacks.

Dodd’s threats come as the Senate Judiciary Committee approved a bill Thursday to rewrite the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. The bill, approved on a 10-9 party-line vote, has significant differences from the Intelligence Committee bill.

Most notably, the Judiciary bill is silent on the issue of retroactive immunity. The bill’s provisions would also sunset after four years, rather than the six-year requirement backed by the Intelligence Committee.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said the Intelligence Committee bill will be brought to the floor in December, and the Judiciary Committee bill will be offered as a substitute amendment. Reid would not say which bill he supports, saying he still had to study the Judiciary measure, and he downplayed the differences between the two measures.

more...

http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/battle-over-wiretapping-bill-looms-in-senate-2007-11-16.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Let it expire...bush would really be in a heap of trouble because
the 1978 bill would go back into effect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC