Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT editorial: In Contempt (Pelosi should schedule a vote quickly on Miers and Bolten)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 12:08 PM
Original message
NYT editorial: In Contempt (Pelosi should schedule a vote quickly on Miers and Bolten)
Edited on Fri Nov-16-07 12:11 PM by ProSense
Editorial

In Contempt

Published: November 16, 2007

White House Chief of Staff Joshua Bolten and Harriet Miers, the former White House counsel, showed their utter disregard for Congress, the Constitution and the American people when they defied Congressional subpoenas in the United States attorneys scandal. The House Judiciary Committee rightly voted to hold them in contempt, and now the matter goes to the full House.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi should schedule a vote quickly, the House should hold them in contempt and Attorney General Michael Mukasey should ensure that they are punished for their defiance of the nation’s law.

<...>

They had no right to refuse. Congress has the legal power to call witnesses to testify, and presidential advisers are not exempt. Conservative lawyers like Bruce Fein agree that the administration’s claims of executive privilege are baseless. If the White House believes specific matters are privileged, it needs to make those limited claims.

Such defiance is not only illegal, it has seriously obstructed Congress’s ability to get to the bottom of the United States attorneys scandal. It now appears that the scandal reaches beyond the nine federal prosecutors who were fired for refusing to allow their offices to be politicized. It seems quite possible that others, including Georgia Thompson, a civil servant in Wisconsin, and Don Siegelman, a former governor of Alabama, were put in prison — and Mr. Siegelman remains there — to help Republicans win elections.

more



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. White House aides face contempt charges

White House aides face contempt charges

Elana Schor in Washington
Friday November 16, 2007
Guardian Unlimited

The Democratic speaker of the House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi, said today she plans to call a vote on holding Bush administration aides in contempt of Congress.

However, she declined to commit to a timetable for escalating the constitutional clash with the White House, which centres on the dismissal of eight United States attorneys by then attorney general, Alberto Gonzales.

Pelosi said freshman Democrats have taken the lead on counting votes for a contempt finding against Josh Bolten, Bush's chief of staff, and Harriet Miers, former Bush counsel.

<...>

John Conyers, the Michigan Democrat who chairs the House judiciary committee, has pushed for action against the two Bush aides this year since filing his official contempt report on November 5.

more



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. KICK & RECOMMEND & HOLD IN CONTEMPT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC